Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To clinically validate the precision of diagnostic Sepsis-3 criteria, and to guide and generalize its clinical application. METHODS:A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted. The patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of 6 tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang Province from January to June 2015 were enrolled, and the patients satisfying the diagnostic criteria of Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 were screened. Population characteristics between the patients satisfying two editions were compared, and the diagnosis accuracy rate in different degree hospitals were investigated. According to the doctor's diagnosis, the patients who met the criteria of Sepsis-2 were divided into diagnosis group and non-diagnosis group, and the factors influencing the diagnosis of sepsis were analyzed by logistic regression. The patients meeting Sepsis-2 but no meeting Sepsis-3 were served as exclusion group, and those meeting Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 were served as enroll group, and the characteristics of patients between the two groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive value of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score, sepsis-related quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) on death, and whether the consistency of qSOFA and SOFA would affect the sensitivity of definition. The patients meeting Sepsis-2 were divided into non-survived group and survived group, and the factors associated with death were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS:Finally, 1 423 patients were enrolled, 3 patients with age < 18 years and 19 patients with missing data were excluded. There were 363 patients and 329 patients met Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3, respectively. No significant differences were found in population characteristics between the groups of Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 (all P > 0.05) except for acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score [19.10 (8.00) vs. 20.28 (8.00), P < 0.05]. It was shown on the clinical data analysis of the hospitals that the patients meeting Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 in hospital 3 had the highest 28-day mortality (60.4% and 60.0%) with the lowest rate of diagnosis (0). While in the hospital 1, the patients had the lowest 28-day mortality (22.9% and 27.2%), and the rate of diagnosis was 19.5%. Interestingly, the patients in hospital 4 had the highest diagnosis rate of sepsis (44.8%), but 28-day mortality was both 58.6%. It was shown by logistic regression analysis that the patients with old age [odds ratio (OR) = 0.970, P = 0.021], high blood lactate (OR = 0.443, P = 0.004), high blood pressure (OR = 0.957, P = 0.009) and low oxygenation index (OR = 1.004, P = 0.024) were easy to neglect diagnosis. Compared with Sepsis-3 exclude group, the patients in Sepsis-3 enroll group were older [years: 68.52 (26.00) vs. 53.75 (18.00), P < 0.01] with higher APACHEII score [20.38 (8.00) vs. 7.72 (6.00), P < 0.01], higher blood lactate [mmol/L: 3.45 (3.00) vs. 1.95 (1.20), P > 0.05], longer length of ICU stay [days: 22.42 (22.00) vs. 15.13 (16.00), P < 0.01], and higher 28-day mortality [45.29% (149/329) vs. 14.71% (5/34), P < 0.01], indicating that the diagnostic efficiency of Sepsis-2 was low, the diagnostic specificity of Sepsis-3 was high, and the prognosis of Sepsis-3 patients was worse. It was shown by ROC curve analysis that the prognostic value of SIRS, qSOFA and SOFA to mortality was gradually increased [area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.567, 0.597, 0.683, respectively], but the prognostic value were all low. Comparing patients meeting qSOFA and (or) SOFA in Sepsis-2, significant differences were found in APACHE II score [17.55 (7.00) vs. 23.24 (8.00)] and 28-day mortality [38.75% (31/80) vs. 58.59% (75/128), both P < 0.01]. The patients who just met the qSOFA or SOFA, their 28-day mortality was up to 38.75%, suggesting that qSOFA should not be ignored. Compared with survived group, the patients in survived group were older with higher APACHE II score and shorter length of ICU stay (all P < 0.05). It was shown by logistic regression analysis that APACHE II score (OR = 1.199, P = 0.000) and length of ICU stay (OR = 0.949, P = 0.000) were related with death. CONCLUSIONS:Patients satisfied Sepsis-3 were easier to develop more organ failure, Sepsis-3 and higher death prediction than Sepsis-2 and higher diagnosis specificity, but data shows that there is extra room for improvement.

Clinical Value of Pediatric Sepsis‐induced Coagulopathy Score in Diagnosis of Sepsis‐induced Coagulopathy and Prognosis in Children

Heparin-binding Protein As a Biomarker of Severe Sepsis in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter, Prospective Study

Comparison of the Predictive Value of Scoring Systems on the Prognosis of Cirrhotic Patients with Suspected Infection

Novel nomogram for the prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in the PICU: A multicentre retrospective study

[Predictive value of sepsis-induced coagulopathy score on 30-day mortality in septic patients]

[Different methods in predicting mortality of pediatric intensive care units sepsis in Southwest China]

Value of modified qSOFA, glucose and lactate in predicting prognosis in children with sepsis in the PICU

Comparison of the prognostic value of four different critical illness scores in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy

A Multiplex Cytokine Score for the Prediction of Disease Severity in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients with Septic Shock

Comparison of a new criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis disseminated intravascular coagulation score in critically ill patients with sepsis 3.0: a retrospective study

Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficacy of SAA1, HBP, CRP，PCT and Cytokine Profiles for Predicting Infection in Pediatric Febrile Patients

Comparison of Three Different Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) Criteria and Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Antithrombin Investigation in Patients with Confirmed Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC)

New criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) following the revised sepsis definition: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide survey

Development and Validation of a Sepsis Mortality Risk Score for Sepsis-3 Patients in Intensive Care Unit

Non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma, coeliac disease, and Epstein–Barr virus: A study of 13 cases of enteropathy‐associated T‐ and B‐cell lymphoma

Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) in the management of sepsis

Comparison of SAPS 3-PIRO Score with Other Four Scoring Systems for Assessing Sepsis

Amalgamation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome score with C-reactive protein level in evaluating acute pancreatitis severity in children.

Clinical Evaluation of Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 in the ICU.

[A multicenter confirmatory study about precision and practicability of Sepsis-3].

Analysis of the diagnostic value of coagulation markers and coagulation function indices on the occurrence of DIC in sepsis and its prognosis