Abstract:Background—In patients with severe heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) systolic function associated with LV reverse remodeling and favorable 1-year survival. However, it is unknown whether LV reverse remodeling translates into a better long-term prognosis and what extent of reverse remodeling is clinically relevant, which were investigated in this study. Methods and Results—Patients (n=141) with advanced heart failure (mean±SD age, 64±11 years; 73% men) who received CRT were followed up for a mean (±SD) of 695±491 days. The extent of reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 3 to 6 months relative to baseline was examined for its predictive value on long-term clinical outcome. The cutoff value for LV reverse remodeling in predicting mortality was derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve. Then the relation between potential predictors of mortality and heart failure hospitalizations were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, followed by Cox regression analysis. There were 22 (15.6%) deaths, mostly due to heart failure or sudden cardiac death. The receiver operating characteristic curve found that a reduction in LVESV of ≥9.5% had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 70% in predicting all-cause mortality and of 87% and 69%, respectively, for cardiovascular mortality. With this cutoff value, there were 87 (61.7%) responders to reverse remodeling. In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, responders had significantly lower all-cause morality (6.9% versus 30.6%, log-rank &khgr;2=13.26, P=0.0003), cardiovascular mortality (2.3% versus 24.1%, log-rank &khgr;2=17.1, P<0.0001), and heart failure events (11.5% versus 33.3%, log-rank &khgr;2=8.71, P=0.0032) than nonresponders. In the Cox regression analysis model, the change in LVESV was the single most important predictor of all-cause (&bgr;=1.048, 95% confidence interval=1.019 to 1.078, P=0.001) and cardiovascular (&bgr;=1.072, 95% confidence interval=1.033 to 1.112, P<0.001) mortality. Clinical parameters were unable to predict any outcome event. Conclusions—A reduction in LVESV of 10% signifies clinically relevant reverse remodeling, which is a strong predictor of lower long-term mortality and heart failure events. This study suggests that assessing volumetric changes after an intervention in patients with heart failure provides information predictive of natural history outcomes.

Long-term Cardiac Remodeling Associated with Heart Failure Following Left-Ventricular Valve Replacement Surgery

Risk factors of chronic left ventricular dysfunction after cardiac valve surgery

Efficacy and risk factors of cardiac valve replacement surgery in the medium term for patients with giant left ventricular

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Remodeling and Systolic Function Recovery by Echocardiography after Valve Replacement with Giant Left Ventricle

Left ventricle reverse remodeling in chronic aortic regurgitation patients with dilated ventricle after aortic valve replacement

Valve Replacement for Valvular Heart Disease with Giant Left Ventricle.

Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling but Not Clinical Improvement Predicts Long-Term Survival after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Immediate and Midterm Cardiac Remodeling after Surgical Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Adults with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

Association Between Risk Factors And Left Ventricular Remodeling In Middle-Aged And Aged Population: A Community-Based Study

The impact of left ventricular reconstruction on survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

The Impact of Severe Ventricular Remodeling on Quality-of-Life Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Impact of Atrail Fibrillation in Cardiac Remodelling after Left Heart Valve Replacement

Preoperative risk factors of medium-term mitral valve repair outcome

Effects Of Myocardial Viability And Left Ventricular Remodeling On Survival Of Patients With Heart Failure And Reduced Ejection Fraction After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement or repair in bicuspid aortic valve with moderate or greater aortic regurgitation

[Long-Term Results of Mitral-Aortic Valve Replacement in 1,154 Patients with Rheumatic Valvular Disease].

Long-term Characteristics and Clinical Significance of Echocardiogram in Patients after Mechanical Prosthesis Aortic Valve Replacement

Does early surgical intervention improve left ventricular mass regression after mitral valve repair for leaflet prolapse?

Long-term Outcomes Following Valve-Sparing Root Replacement with Concomitant Mitral Repair

Early and long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair in degenerative mitral regurgitation

Patterns of left ventricular remodeling post-myocardial infarction, determinants, and outcome