Upper body loading in rugby union tackling are affected by tackle direction and impact shoulder

E. Seminati,D. Cazzola,G. Trewartha,E. Preatoni

2017-04-19

Abstract:SUBMISSION INFORMATION Corresponding Author Name: Elena Seminati Affiliation: University of Bath Status (faculty staff, postgraduate student etc.): Staff Research Associate Presentation preference (ORAL, POSTER or EITHER): ORAL

Political Science,Engineering

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

TACKLE DIRECTION AND DOMINANT SIDE AFFECT UPPER BODY LOADING DURING RUGBY TACKLES

Elena Seminati,Dario Cazzola,Ezio Preatoni,Keith Stokes,Sean Williams,Grant Trewartha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097372.259

IF: 18.4793

2017-02-01

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Approximately 25% of Rugby Union injuries occur to players executing a tackle and they mostly involve upper-body regions. To investigate how upper-body biomechanical loading changes depending on the tackle characteristics, such as side of body used and direction of approach. A repeated-measures study where a group of Rugby Union players performed full tackling trials against a bespoke tackle simulator. Two conditions (both within-group factors) were analysed: laterality (left/right shoulder) and direction (front/diagonal/lateral) of the tackler's approach. A laboratory-based study. Six male players (26.7±7.6 years, 1.82±0.09 m, 95.7±14.0 kg), all right-side dominant. Participants completed up to 2 dynamic tackles in each of the 6 testing conditions. A 40 kg punch-bag was accelerated manually to simulate the ball carrier and the tackler executed a full tackling movement bringing the punch-bag to the ground. Peak shoulder impact forces and head linear accelerations were measured through pressure sensors and inertial measurement units. Linear mixed models and magnitude-based inferences were used to assess differences between conditions. Dominant (right) shoulder tackles in the frontal direction generated the highest impact forces (5.3±1.0 kN), and overall they were substantially higher (by 15%) than non-dominant (left) shoulder tackles. Impact load decreased going from frontal to diagonal −3%) and lateral tackling (−10%). The lowest peak head accelerations (substantially lower [−5%] compared to frontal tackles) were recorded during diagonal tackles, with the right shoulder (9.1±3.5 g). Both laterality (dominant side) and tackle direction have a substantial effect on the loads applied to the upper-body. Where feasible, the tackler should approach from a slightly offset angle from frontal and coaching should aim to reduce the deficiencies in tackling technique on the non-dominant side.

sport sciences
Biomechanical loads in rugby union tackling are affected by tackle direction and impact shoulder

E. Seminati,D. Cazzola,Sean Williams,G. Trewartha,E. Preatoni

2017-04-03

Abstract:Approximately 25% of Rugby Union injuries occur to players executing a tackle and they mostly involve upper-body regions. We designed novel tackle simulator to investigate upper-body loading under different tackling conditions: direction of approach and side of body used. Dominant shoulder tackles in the frontal direction generated the highest impact forces, 5.3 ± 1.0 kN (15% higher than non-dominant) and the lowest range of neck flexion (20% lower than non-dominant) at impact. Impact load decreased going from frontal to diagonal (-3%) and lateral tackling (-10%). The lowest peak head acceleration and angular velocity resulted from diagonal tackles with the dominant shoulder. For injury prevention, the tackler should approach from an offset angle from frontal and coaching should aim to reduce the deficiencies in tackling technique on the non-dominant side.

Medicine,Engineering
The effects of tackle height on inertial loading of the head and neck in Rugby Union: A multibody model analysis

Gregory J. Tierney,Ciaran K. Simms

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1385853

2017-10-24

Brain Injury

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: There is evidence of chronic injury to the head-and-neck region of Rugby Union players. The aim of this study was to use multibody simulations to examine the effects of tackle height on both Tackler and Ball Carrier head kinematics and neck dynamics.RESEARCH DESIGN: Quantitative Exploratory Study Methods and procedures: 45 front-on shoulder tackles with no direct contact to the head/neck were simulated with the MADYMO pedestrian model and used to assess differences between upper body tackles and lower body tackles. The average resultant head linear and angular accelerations as well as neck forces and moments were assessed.MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Much higher Ball Carrier head kinematic values and neck loading were predicted for upper body tackles compared to lower body tackles, and principal findings were unaffected by a sensitivity analysis. Tackler results were less straightforward and trends were influenced by the sensitivity analysis for muscle activation.CONCLUSION: Although further model validation is required, the results of this study indicate the need for further research on tackle heights and inertial head-and-neck loading in the tackle phase of play in Rugby Union.

neurosciences,rehabilitation
THE IMPACT OF THE TACKLE: SHOULDER INJURIES IN A RUGBY UNION TEAM

RDJ Whitham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093035.4

IF: 18.4793

2013-10-24

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Rugby Union (rugby) is the third most popular contact sport in the world and has one of the highest reported incidences of injuries amongst all sports. Thoroughly characterising these injuries may help develop preventative methods to reduce absence from rugby at professional and amateur levels. Although the tackle event is most commonly associated with concussion and cervical nerve root injuries, shoulder injuries are responsible for up to 46% of days lost to participation at a professional level. This study sought to evaluate the circumstances, severity, and type of shoulder injuries over the course of one season at a professional rugby team. All shoulder injuries from matches and training during the 2010–11 season at a Welsh regional rugby team were identified retrospectively using the SportsCode video analysis programme. Data recorded for circumstances included direction and height of a tackle, and player movement and the nature of a tackle (e.g. stopping tackle). Severity was measured by number of days lost from competition and/or training. Type of shoulder injury was classified using the Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) version 10.1. There were 24 injuries (3 training injuries and 21 match-related) during the 2010–2011 season. The tackle event caused 92% of injuries (n=22) and resulted in 99% (399 of 405 days) of time lost to shoulder injuries. Cumulatively, players who were tackled remained injured for longer than those tackling (266 days vs. 133 days). Of the 19 videos available for analysis of injury circumstance, injuries most frequently occurred when tackles were high (74%), front-on (53%) and when players were moving with speed (68%). The commonest injuries sustained were acromioclavicular joint sprains (n=9), yet per injury the most severe were dislocation injuries (mean severity, 51.5 days). The tackle event causes the majority of shoulder injuries in professional rugby and is the commonest cause of days lost due to shoulder injuries. Therefore, potential methods of “prehabilitation” such as strengthening muscles around the joint to stabilise the shoulder and coaching correct tackle techniques are essential in minimising time lost. A larger study across a greater number of professional rugby teams, using immediate post-injury video analysis, is needed before evidence-based recommendations for shoulder injury prevention can be made.

sport sciences
Effects of tackle height and shoulder preference on head and trunk acceleration in rugby

Yuta Ogata,Takashi Soejima,Kenji Hara,Hiromi Takahata,Yu Ando,Akihiro Yamashita,Mutsuo Yamada,Hidetaka Murakami,Akira Maeda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241252967

2024-05-06

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Abstract:International Journal of Sports Science &Coaching, Ahead of Print. BackgroundMost rugby injuries occur during tackles, therefore investigating safe tackling techniques is essential.ObjectivesTo determine the effects of different tackle heights and shoulder preference on head and trunk acceleration.MethodsThirty-nine rugby players belonging to university leagues, adult leagues, and adult leagues, tackled a stationary tackle bag under three height conditions (high, middle, and low) with a dominant shoulder and a non-dominant shoulder. We calculated the peak head and trunk accelerations (PhA and PtA, respectively) during the tackles and evaluated the difference in accelerations by the tackle height and side.ResultsThe PhA (26.1 g (17.1) g) during the tackles was significantly higher than the PtA (11.7(7.2) g, p < 0.01). The PhA was significantly larger in the high (27.4 (19.4) g) and middle (27.7 (17.0) g) tackles compared to the low (23.4 (14.6) g) tackle (high vs low: p < 0.01; middle vs low: p < 0.01). The PhA was significantly lower during the dominant shoulder side (23.0 (13.7) g) tackles than during the non-dominant shoulder side (30.4 (21.3) g) tackles (p < 0.01).ConclusionThe results suggest that coaching strategies and policies aimed at reducing tackler height and improving tackle technique on the non-dominant shoulder would help reduce head acceleration forces.

hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism,psychology, applied
At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in English Premiership Rugby

Brady P Moore,Dakota Doucet,Bobby Dow,Sree M Vemu,Takashi Hirase,Rex A W Marco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241255097

2024-07-29

Abstract:Background: Head-down tackling has been associated with higher rates of head and neck injuries and less successful tackles compared with head-up tackling in American football. In rugby, head and neck injuries have been associated with tackling, with the tackler's head positioned in front of the ball carrier. Purpose: To assess the success and risks of tackling techniques used in the English Rugby Premiership matches. Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Three reviewers analyzed 1000 consecutive solo defensive tackling attempts during the 2022 to 2023 season in 6 English Rugby Premiership matches. Slow-motion replays were used to analyze the success of the tackling attempt in terms of head angulation (head up vs head down), head position relative to the offensive player's waist at point of contact, and tackling method (inside shoulder, arm, head across the bow, and head-to-head). The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical data, and the 2-tailed Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous data. Results: The mean interrater reliabilities for analyzing the tackles were good across all groups (κ = 0.715). Head-up and head-down tackling occurred in 848 tackle attempts (84.8%) and 152 tackle attempts (15.2%), respectively. Head-up tackles were successful in 80.7% of the tackle attempts compared with 71.1% of the head-down tackle attempts (P = .0072). Tackles made at or above the waist were successful in 80.7% of the tackle attempts compared with 73.1% of tackles below the waist (P = .0193). The inside-shoulder technique had the highest successful tackle rate at 90.8%, compared with 44.2% with the arm technique (P < .0001) and 72.4% with the head-across-the-bow technique (P < .0001). The inside-shoulder technique resulted in head-up tackling in 84.8% of players compared with 59.8% with the head-across-the-bow technique (P < .0001) and 94.9% with arm tackling (P = .0001). There were 4 recorded injuries to the tackler: 2 neck injuries, 1 shoulder injury, and 1 wrist/hand injury. Conclusion: Head-up tackling, tackles made at or above the level of the offensive player's waist, and inside-shoulder tackling were found to be more efficient in producing successful tackles. The head-down, tackling below the waist, and head-across-the-bow techniques were associated with poor tackling and lower success rates.
Can tackle height influence tackle gainline success outcomes in elite level rugby union?

Gregory J Tierney,Ciaran K Simms

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954117751345

2017-12-27

Abstract:In rugby union, effective defensive play is highly technical and essential for game outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify tackle heights, for given tackle types, that had a greater propensity to result in tackle gainline success for the tackler using match video evidence. The results indicated that tackling the upper legs of the ball carrier had a greater propensity to result in tackler success for both front-on (OR = 3.27; 95% CI = 1.34–7.95; p < 0.01) and side-on (OR = 5.31; 95% CI = 2.08–13.6; p < 0.01) arm tackles. For shoulder tackles, tackling at the lower trunk for front-on tackles (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.04-2.79; p = 0.03) and the mid trunk for side-on tackles (OR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.31–7.37; p < 0.01) had a greater propensity to result in tackler success. For smother tackles, tackling at the mid trunk had a greater propensity to result in tackler success during front-on (OR = 3.49; 95% CI = 1.81–6.74; p < 0.01) and side-on (OR = 5.11; 95% CI = 2.42–10.8; p < 0.01) tackles. The results highlight the importance of tackle height when coaching the tackle. The findings also suggest that technically proficient players can advance to more challenging contact techniques than aiming for the ball carrier’s centre of gravity.

hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism,psychology, applied
Tackling the tackle 1: A descriptive analysis of 14,679 tackles and risk factors for high tackles in a community-level male amateur rugby union competition during a lowered tackle height law variation trial

Riaan van Tonder,Sharief Hendricks,Lindsay Starling,Sean Surmon,Pierre Viviers,Wilbur Kraak,Keith A Stokes,Wayne Derman,James Craig Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.10.011

Abstract:Objectives: In rugby union (rugby), the tackle is the most frequent cause of concussion and thus a target for intervention to reduce concussion incidence. The aim of this study is to describe tackle characteristics and factors associated with illegal high tackles in amateur community-level rugby during a lowered (armpit level) tackle height law variation trial. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Methods: Video surveillance of a single season, four-league competition with coding of video data according to a predefined coding framework. Descriptive statistics of tackle detail and logistic regression was performed to analyse factors associated with high tackles. Results: One hundred and eight matches with 14,679 tackles and a mean of 137 (±30) tackles per match were analysed. High tackles (above armpit level) had significantly greater odds of occurring in the lower (2nd-4th) leagues (OR: 1.95; 95 % CI: 1.6-2.4; p < 0.001), front-on tackles (OR: 1.61; 95 % CI: 1.3-2.0; p < 0.001), arm tackles (OR: 1.65; 95 % CI: 1.3-2.1; p < 0.001), bent-at-waist ball carrier (OR: 1.93; 95 % CI: 1.6-2.4; p < 0.001), falling/diving ball carrier (OR: 2.21; 95 % CI: 1.6-3.1; p < 0.001), and an upright tackler (OR: 3.38; 95 % CI: 2.7-4.2; p < 0.001). A falling/diving tackler had significantly lower odds of being associated with a high tackle (OR: 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.3-0.6; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Overall mean tackles per match were similar to those of senior amateur and elite rugby. League, tackle type, tackle aspect, and player body positions were associated with high tackles. These findings reiterate the need for ongoing efforts to identify and implement mitigating strategies to reduce tackle-related injury risk.
Electromyographic analysis of selected shoulder muscles during a rugby football tackle

Lee Herrington,Ian Horsley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-1-10

2009-05-21

Abstract:BackgroundEpidemiological studies have shown that the incidence of shoulder injuries is increasing in rugby and the majority are related to the contact/tackle phase of play. However, no data currently exists that describes preparatory muscle activity during tackle. This information could aid in guiding training and rehabilitation, if available. The purpose of the study was to assess the sequence of onset of EMG activity of selected scapulohumeral muscles during rugby tackle. 15 healthy professional rugby players participated in the study. Surface EMG activity was assessed for timing of onset relative to time of impact during a modified tackle activity in pectorialis major, biceps brachii, latissimus dorsi, serratus anterior and infraspinatus muscles.ResultsOnset of activity occurred in all muscles prior to impact. Factorial ANOVA showed significant differences between muscles in activation timing (p = 0.0001), paired t-tests revealed that serratus anterior was activated prior to all other muscles tested (p < 0.04, for all comparisons), with comparison between all other muscles showing no significant differences (p > 0.05), except pectorialis major on all comparisons showed significantly later activation timing than all other muscles (p < 0.001).ConclusionMuscle activation timing may if not properly balanced around the shoulder girdle expose the glenohumeral joint to excessive load and stress. This paper demonstrates a simple method which sets out some preliminary normative data in healthy players. Further studies relating these data to injured players are required.
Impact of Lower-extremity Strength on Shoulder Tackle of Female Rugby Players Measured with Sensor System

Jie Meng,X. Song,H. Xu,Yigang Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.2021.3265

IF: 1.2

2021-05-06

Sensors and Materials

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of lower-extremity strength on the shoulder tackle ability of Chinese elite female rugby players. The impact strength of a tackle and the lower-extremity strength were measured by force sensors and an isokinetic strength tester. The results provide a theoretical reference for the specialized strength training of shoulder tackle techniques, relevant technical learning, and sports injury prevention, as well as for improving the defensive ability of shoulder tackles. The lower-extremity isokinetic strengths of the hip, knee, and ankle and the shoulder tackle impact force of 18 Chinese elite female rugby players were measured at fixed angular velocities of 60 and 180°/s by an IsoMed 2000 strength testing instrument and an impact force tester. SPSS 25 software was used to test for a normal distribution by single-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) and independent-sample t-tests and the Pearson correlation test. The following findings were obtained. (1) The bilateral lower-extremity hip, knee, and ankle flexors and extensors had an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) at fixed angular velocities of 60 and 180°/s, and the test results of the extensors were greater than those of the flexors. (2) The right knee and left ankle extensors of the lower-extremity isokinetic strength were related to the shoulder tackle impact force. On the basis of these findings, it is suggested that (1) the lower-extremity isokinetic strengths of the front knee and back ankle in dominant-side tackles should be used as indexes to evaluate shoulder tackle ability, and (2) the balanced development of lower-extremity strength can help athletes enhance the defensive capacity of shoulder tackles, promote technical learning, improve the stability of actions, and prevent sports injuries. for the correlation between the lower-extremity strength and the defensive effect of shoulder tackles. In this study, we selected Chinese elite female rugby players as the subjects to implement objective measurements and a characteristic analysis on their isokinetic hip, knee, and ankle strengths and to explore the impact of lower-extremity strength on shoulder tackle techniques. Our results provide a theoretical reference for the specialized strength training, technical learning, and sports injury prevention of Chinese rugby players and provide evidence for relevant research on rugby sports as part of their promotion in China.

Medicine,Engineering
Tackle characteristics and outcomes in match-play rugby league: the relationship with tackle ability and physical qualities

Michael J.A. Speranza,Tim J. Gabbett,David A. Greene,Rich D. Johnston,Andrew D. Townshend

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2017.1361041

2017-08-08

Science and Medicine in Football

Abstract:Purpose: This study examined tackle characteristics and their relationships with match-play tackle outcomes, tackling ability, and physical qualities in rugby league players. Methods: Fifteen rugby league matches were analysed, with the tackle characteristics and outcomes of 2355 tackle events coded. Muscle strength and power tests, and a standardized assessment of tackling ability were performed in 16 players. Results: Medium body position, utilizing a shoulder or smother tackles, and producing leg drive upon contact decreased the odds of a missed tackle. Performing a front-on tackle, with a contact zone at the chest region reduced the odds of an offload. Tackling ability was significantly related to defenders moving forward prior to contact (rs = 0.60, 95% CI 0.15–0.85, P = 0.02), front-on tackles (rs = 0.53, 95% CI 0.05–0.81, P = 0.04), and displaying medium body height (rs = 0.57, 95% CI 0.10–0.83, P = 0.02) in match-play tackles. Lower-body strength was significantly related to defenders exhibiting a medium body position (rs = 0.60, 95% CI 0.15–0.85, P = 0.01) and the ball-carrier being placed on their back (rs = 0.72, 95% CI 0.35–0.90, P = 0.002). Conclusion: The findings suggest that match-play tackle performance is related to both tackle characteristics and physical qualities.

sport sciences
Are recommended tackle techniques associated with superior performance outcomes? A retrospective video analysis study of elite women's rugby union

Kathryn Dane,Stephen West,Ciaran Simms,Hendricks Sharief,Nicol van Dyk,Will Connors,Anthony Ventresque,Fiona Wilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2434799

IF: 3.9428

2024-12-01

Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract:This cross-sectional study aims to identify the situational characteristics, ball-carrier technical variables, and Tackle Ready recommended techniques associated with performance outcomes in elite women's Rugby Union. Using retrospective video analysis, 43 tackler and ball-carrier technical characteristics for 1500 tackle events in the 2022–23 Women's Six Nations Championship were assessed, considering match situation and performance outcomes. Rate ratio (RR) was determined using propensity rates. Effective tackles were associated with match situations involving two defenders, forwards tackling forwards, defensive teams moving forwards, and tackles initiated closer to attackers at ball reception. Seven out of the 22 coded Tackle Ready techniques were significantly associated with superior performance outcomes. Techniques associated with the greatest likelihood of effective tackle outcome included wrap and clamp (RR 46.8) and ear to body (RR 20.9). Tackles made to the hip and leg of the ball-carrier increased the risk of missed tackles. This study provides the first analysis of tackle characteristics associated with performance outcomes in women's rugby, providing a reference to inform coaching practice and the implementation of tackle education resources and law changes. Further research is warranted to explore techniques associated with injury risk, and interactions between match situations and subsequent tactical/technical tackle actions.

sport sciences
Tackling the tackle 2: Evaluation of referee and player behavioural change as measures of implementation of a law variation in community-level male amateur rugby union

Riaan van Tonder,Sharief Hendricks,Lindsay Starling,Sean Surmon,Pierre Viviers,Wilbur Kraak,Keith A Stokes,Wayne Derman,James Craig Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.11.004

Abstract:Objectives: To evaluate player and referee behaviour during a lower tackle height law variation trial in community rugby union ('rugby'). Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Methods: In a law variation trial in male amateur community rugby, coded match video surveillance data were analysed. Referee (sanctioning rate) and player (tackler body position) behaviour changes over one season (under the lowered, armpit-level maximum legal tackle height condition) were analysed in three approximately equal periods of the season. Secondarily, an independent professional referee reviewed illegal high tackle sanctioning data. Results: Overall, 108 matches with 14,780 tackles were filmed and coded. Sanctioned illegal high tackle propensity was significantly higher in the mid-season (41 sanctioned high tackles/1000 tackle events; 95 % CI: 35-47), compared with first and last periods. Upright tacklers in tackles decreased significantly in the final vs. middle period of the season (rate ratio: 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.54-0.88; p < 0.01). Of all the coder-determined high tackles also assessed as high under the new law by the independent referee, 51 % were sanctioned by the on-field referee. Conclusions: Positive player and referee behavioural changes were observed during a lowered legal tackle height law variation in this community rugby setting. Increased mid-phase high tackle sanctioning by referees was followed by fewer tackles with upright tacklers in the subsequent (last) phase of the season. Encouraging positive behaviour changes of this nature, particularly if sustained (beyond trial study periods), may contribute to overall injury risk reduction, and hold considerable importance to inform future injury prevention strategies in rugby.
Head Acceleration Events During Tackle, Ball‐Carry, and Ruck Events in Professional Southern Hemisphere Men's Rugby Union Matches: A Study Using Instrumented Mouthguards

Gregory Roe,Thomas Sawczuk,Cameron Owen,James Tooby,Lindsay Starling,Mark S. Gilthorpe,Éanna Falvey,Sharief Hendricks,Karen Rasmussen,Clint Readhead,Danielle Salmon,Keith Stokes,Ross Tucker,Ben Jones

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14676

2024-06-14

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

Abstract:Scandinavian Journal of Medicine &Science in Sports, Volume 34, Issue 6, June 2024.

sport sciences
Does tackle height influence offload success in rugby union? Analysis from the 2019 Rugby World Cup

Joshua Amayo,Gregory J Tierney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954120973660

2020-11-20

Abstract:Offloads are an effective way of breaking through a defensive line in rugby union. Higher tackle heights are considered an effective strategy to defend against offloads. However, in a bid to reduce head injuries, there is a cultural shift within the rules of the game to tackle lower down on the body. This study used match video analysis of ten games from the 2019 Rugby World Cup to investigate whether tackle height influences offload success for the ball carrier. Each legal tackle was categorised based on tackle height (e.g. shoulder), player body position (e.g. upright), tackle type (e.g. shoulder tackle), tackle direction (e.g. front on) and player position (e.g. tight forwards). For each characteristic, the Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were calculated based on offload success outcome. Tackles at the hip (OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.96, p = 0.018) and upper leg (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.90, p = 0.001) had a greater propensity to result in offload success while tackles at shoulder height reduced offload success (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.22, p < 0.001). A bent at the waist tackler against an upright ball carrier had a greater propensity to result in offload success (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.54, p = 0.004). Tackling lower increased the chances of offload success for the ball carrier. The cultural shift towards lower tackle heights is likely to result in an increased number of offloads and it is up to players, coaches and defensive systems to be able to adapt to this.

hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism,psychology, applied
An Extended Neck Position is Likely to Produce Cervical Spine Injuries Through Buckling in Accidental Head-First Impacts During Rugby Tackling

Pavlos Silvestros,Ryan D. Quarrington,Ezio Preatoni,Harinderjit S. Gill,Claire F. Jones,Dario Cazzola

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03576-z

IF: 3.8

2024-07-14

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract:Abstract Catastrophic cervical spine injuries in rugby often occur during tackling. The underlying mechanisms leading to these injuries remain unclear, with neck hyperflexion and buckling both proposed as the causative factor in the injury prevention literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pre-impact head–neck posture on intervertebral neck loads and motions during a head-first rugby tackle. Using a validated, subject-specific musculoskeletal model of a rugby player, and computer simulations driven by in vivo and in vitro data, we examined the dynamic response of the cervical spine under such impact conditions. The simulations demonstrated that the initial head–neck sagittal-plane posture affected intervertebral loads and kinematics, with an extended neck resulting in buckling and supraphysiologic intervertebral shear and flexion loads and motions, typical of bilateral facet dislocation injuries. In contrast, an initially flexed neck increased axial compression forces and flexion angles without exceeding intervertebral physiological limits. These findings provide objective evidence that can inform injury prevention strategies or rugby law changes to improve the safety of the game of rugby.

engineering, biomedical
Are we tackle ready? Cross‐sectional video analysis of match tackle characteristics in elite women's Rugby Union

Kathryn Dane,Stephen W. West,Sharief Hendricks,Ciaran Simms,Nicol van Dyk,Will Connors,Fiona Wilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12120

2024-05-17

European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract:The tackle contest is the most common and most injurious match contact event in rugby and is an indicator of performance. Tackle Ready is World Rugby's tackle technique education program. Limited research has characterized the tackle contest in women's rugby. The purpose of this study is to: (1) identify the match situational characteristics, ball‐carrier and tackler technical actions demonstrated in elite women's Rugby Union and (2) to determine the extent to which Tackle Ready recommended tackle techniques were exhibited. Technical characteristics for 1500 tackle events in the 2022–2023 Women's Six Nations Championship were visually assessed according to a predefined coding framework and the Tackle Ready program. Tackles lacked full completion (0.2%) of the 22 coded Tackle Ready techniques with 47% of the recommended techniques demonstrated in each tackle on average (range 15%–98%). A high proportion of tackles involved two defenders (48%), approaching ball‐carriers from the side (38%) or oblique angles (39%), in an upright position (30%), and with initial contact made with the arm (51%). Incorrect pre‐contact head positioning and head placement upon contact accounted for 50% and 15% of tackles, respectively, and there was a mean of 14 (95% CI 11–18) head and neck contacts to a tackler and 18 (95% CI 14–22) head and neck contacts to a ball‐carrier per game. Targeted interventions to encourage adoption of recommended techniques are needed to reduce tackle‐related injury risk in women's rugby. This study provides valuable context for future discussion across law enforcement, coach education and gender‐specific tackle coaching in the women's game.

sport sciences
Instrumented mouthguards in elite-level men's and women's rugby union: characterising tackle-based head acceleration events

James Woodward,James Tooby,Ross Tucker,Éanna C Falvey,Danielle M Salmon,Lindsay Starling,Gregory Tierney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002013

2024-08-01

Abstract:Objectives: To examine the propensity of tackle height and the number of tacklers that result in head acceleration events (HAEs) in elite-level male and female rugby tackles. Methods: Instrumented mouthguard data were collected from women (n=67) and men (n=72) elite-level rugby players from five elite and three international teams. Peak linear acceleration and peak angular acceleration were extracted from HAEs. Propensities for HAEs at a range of thresholds were calculated as the proportion of tackles/carries that resulted in an HAE exceeding a given magnitude for coded tackle height (low, medium, high) and number of tacklers. Propensity ratios with 95% CIs were calculated for tackle heights and number of tacklers. Results: High tackles had a 32.7 (95% CI=6.89 to 155.02) and 41.2 (95% CI=9.22 to 184.58) propensity ratio to cause ball carrier HAEs>30 g compared with medium tackles for men and women, respectively. Low tackles had a 2.6 (95% CI=1.91 to 3.42) and 5.3 (95% CI=3.28 to 8.53) propensity ratio to cause tackler HAEs>30 g compared with medium tackles for men and women, respectively. In men, multiple tacklers had a higher propensity ratio (6.1; 95% CI=3.71 to 9.93) than singular tacklers to cause ball carrier HAEs>30 g but a lower propensity ratio (0.4; 95% CI=0.29 to 0.56) to cause tackler HAEs>30 g. No significant differences were observed in female tacklers or carriers for singular or multiple tacklers. Conclusion: To limit HAE exposure, rule changes and coaching interventions that promote tacklers aiming for the torso (medium tackle) could be explored, along with changes to multiple tackler events in the male game.
Clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation of uninjured dominant shoulder in amateur rugby players vs a control group: a pilot study

Giovanni Monteleone,Alfonso Tramontana,Roberto Sorge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-024-00897-6

Abstract:Background: Rugby is a sport involving a great number of shoulder collisions. Traumatic stress of the shoulder can weaken the static stabilizers and promote major injuries as dislocation or full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. The goal of this study is to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic dominant shoulder factures in a group of amateur rugby players, with no history of shoulder injuries, and to compare them with those of a control group. Methods: 52 male subjects join in the study: 26 amateur rugby players and 26 subjects, which did not practice rugby or competitive sport. Clinical history was obtained from all subjects, followed by dominant shoulder physical and ultrasonographic exams. Results: Rugby players showed a higher prevalence of positive clinical test, suggesting subacromial impingement than control group (p = 0.01). Among rugby group, five players (19,2%) showed positive test for radiculopathy (p = 0,02), and ten players (73,1%) reported shoulder pain needing pain-reliever drugs at list one time in the last six months (p = 0.001). In rugby group, ultrasound exams showed 23,1% degenerative changes and 30,8% tendon calcifications in supraspinatus tendons (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Uninjured dominant shoulder of rugby players shows higher prevalence of clinical and ultrasound changes compare to control. Some rugby players without history of cervical symptoms show positive clinical test of cervical radiculopathy. Clinical and ultrasonographic monitoring of the shoulder can play a role in prevention and knowledge of silent shoulder damage in these athletes.
Tackle Risk Factors for Head Injury Assessments (HIAs) in Sub-Elite Rugby League and Recommendations for Prevention: Head Contacts from Upright Tackles Increase the HIA Risk to Both Ball Carrier and Tackler

Martin A. Lang,Ross Tucker,Suzi Edwards,Grant L. Iverson,Andrew J. Gardner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00696-7

2024-04-17

Sports Medicine - Open

Abstract:Abstract Background The rugby league tackle has been identified as the game event with the greatest propensity for a clinically diagnosed concussion. This study aims to replicate the work conducted in professional rugby league and rugby union by examining Head Injury Assessment (HIA) events to determine the associated tackle characteristics that increase concussion risk in sub-elite rugby league players. This comparison between competition levels is important due to the less developed physiological and tackle proficiency characteristics of sub-elite rugby league players and the fewer resources available for an on-field diagnosis, compared to the elite level of the sport. Results Tackles resulting in Head Injury Assessments (HIAs, n = 131) and 2,088 tackles that did not result in a head injury were identified and coded from one season of the 2019 Queensland Cup. The body position of both ball carrier and tackler, tackle height, and body contact areas were evaluated. The propensity for tacklers to undergo a head injury assessment was 1.49 HIAs per 1,000 tackles, equating to a 2.5-fold higher risk than that of the ball carrier (0.59 HIAs per 1,000 tackles). The risk for an HIA was 2.75-fold greater when the tackler was upright (2.89 HIAs per 1,000 tackles) compared to a bent-at-the-waist tackler (1.05 HIAs per 1,000 tackles). The greatest risk for the tackler and ball carrier sustaining an HIA occurred when the tackle height was high, with head-to-head contact having the greatest propensity for an HIA (44.37 HIAs per 1,000 tackles). HIA risk was also greater for both players when the ball carrier did not employ an evasion strategy (3.73 HIAs per 1,000 tackles). Conclusions The study replicates results from research in elite rugby league and rugby union. A combination of higher head contact/proximity and upright body position significantly increase an HIA risk. Tackler head position and ball carrier evasion behaviours also affect risk, suggesting that injury prevention strategies designed to reduce tackle height and improve tackle technique by focusing on head position, body position, and in a novel finding, ball carrier evasion, may reduce head injury risk in sub-elite rugby league players.

sport sciences

Upper body loading in rugby union tackling are affected by tackle direction and impact shoulder

TACKLE DIRECTION AND DOMINANT SIDE AFFECT UPPER BODY LOADING DURING RUGBY TACKLES

Biomechanical loads in rugby union tackling are affected by tackle direction and impact shoulder

The effects of tackle height on inertial loading of the head and neck in Rugby Union: A multibody model analysis

THE IMPACT OF THE TACKLE: SHOULDER INJURIES IN A RUGBY UNION TEAM

Effects of tackle height and shoulder preference on head and trunk acceleration in rugby

At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in English Premiership Rugby

Can tackle height influence tackle gainline success outcomes in elite level rugby union?

Tackling the tackle 1: A descriptive analysis of 14,679 tackles and risk factors for high tackles in a community-level male amateur rugby union competition during a lowered tackle height law variation trial

Electromyographic analysis of selected shoulder muscles during a rugby football tackle

Impact of Lower-extremity Strength on Shoulder Tackle of Female Rugby Players Measured with Sensor System

Tackle characteristics and outcomes in match-play rugby league: the relationship with tackle ability and physical qualities

Are recommended tackle techniques associated with superior performance outcomes? A retrospective video analysis study of elite women's rugby union

Tackling the tackle 2: Evaluation of referee and player behavioural change as measures of implementation of a law variation in community-level male amateur rugby union

Head Acceleration Events During Tackle, Ball‐Carry, and Ruck Events in Professional Southern Hemisphere Men's Rugby Union Matches: A Study Using Instrumented Mouthguards

Does tackle height influence offload success in rugby union? Analysis from the 2019 Rugby World Cup

An Extended Neck Position is Likely to Produce Cervical Spine Injuries Through Buckling in Accidental Head-First Impacts During Rugby Tackling

Are we tackle ready? Cross‐sectional video analysis of match tackle characteristics in elite women's Rugby Union

Instrumented mouthguards in elite-level men's and women's rugby union: characterising tackle-based head acceleration events

Clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation of uninjured dominant shoulder in amateur rugby players vs a control group: a pilot study

Tackle Risk Factors for Head Injury Assessments (HIAs) in Sub-Elite Rugby League and Recommendations for Prevention: Head Contacts from Upright Tackles Increase the HIA Risk to Both Ball Carrier and Tackler