Development of functional connectivity within and among the resting-state networks in anesthetized rhesus monkeys

Bo Rao,Dan Xu,Chaoyang Zhao,Shouchao Wang,Xuan Li,Wenbo Sun,Yadong Gang,Jian Fang,Haibo Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118473
IF: 5.7
2021-01-01
NeuroImage
Abstract:Objective: The age-related changes in the resting-state networks (RSNs) exhibited temporally specific patterns in humans, and humans and rhesus monkeys have similar RSNs. We hypothesized that the RSNs in rhesus monkeys experienced similar developmental patterns as humans. Methods: We acquired resting-state fMRI data from 62 rhesus monkeys, which were divided into childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood groups. Group independent component analysis (ICA) was used to identify monkey RSNs. We detected the between-group differences in the RSNs and static, dynamic, and effective functional network connections (FNCs) using one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and post-hoc analysis. Results: Eight rhesus RSNs were identified, including cerebellum (CN), left and right lateral visual (LVN and RVN), posterior default mode (pDMN), visuospatial (VSN), frontal (FN), salience (SN), and sensorimotor networks (SMN). In internal connections, the CN, SN, FN, and SMN mainly matured in early adulthood. The static FNCs associated with FN, SN, pDMN primarily experienced fast descending slow ascending type (U-shaped) developmental patterns for maturation, and the dynamic FNCs related to pDMN (RVN, CN, and SMN) and SMN (CN) were mature in early adulthood. The effective FNC results showed that the pDMN and VSN (stimulated), SN (inhibited), and FN (first inhibited then stimulated) chiefly matured in early adulthood. Conclusion: We identified eight monkey RSNs, which exhibited similar development patterns as humans. All the RSNs and FNCs in monkeys were not widely changed but fine-tuned. Our study clarified that the progressive synchronization, exploration, and regulation of cognitive RSNs within the pDMN, FN, SN, and VSN denoted potential maturation of the RSNs throughout development. We confirmed the development patterns of RSNs and FNCs would support the use of monkeys as a best animal model for human brain function.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?