Abstract:Abstract Purpose Many science, technology and innovation (STI) resources are attached with several different labels. To assign automatically the resulting labels to an interested instance, many approaches with good performance on the benchmark datasets have been proposed for multilabel classification task in the literature. Furthermore, several open-source tools implementing these approaches have also been developed. However, the characteristics of real-world multilabel patent and publication datasets are not completely in line with those of benchmark ones. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to evaluate comprehensively seven multi-label classification methods on real-world datasets. Design/methodology/approach Three real-world datasets (Biological-Sciences, Health-Sciences, and USPTO) from SciGraph and USPTO database are constructed. Seven multilabel classification methods with tuned parameters (dependency-LDA, ML k NN, LabelPowerset, RA k EL, TextCNN, TexRNN, and TextRCNN) are comprehensively compared on these three real-world datasets. To evaluate the performance, the study adopts three classification-based metrics: Macro-F1, Micro-F1, and Hamming Loss. Findings The TextCNN and TextRCNN models show obvious superiority on small-scale datasets with more complex hierarchical structure of labels and more balanced documentlabel distribution in terms of macro-F1, micro-F1 and Hamming Loss. The ML k NN method works better on the larger-scale dataset with more unbalanced document-label distribution. Research limitations Three real-world datasets differ in the following aspects: statement, data quality, and purposes. Additionally, open-source tools designed for multi-label classification also have intrinsic differences in their approaches for data processing and feature selection, which in turn impacts the performance of a multi-label classification approach. In the near future, we will enhance experimental precision and reinforce the validity of conclusions by employing more rigorous control over variables through introducing expanded parameter settings. Practical implications The observed Macro F1 and Micro F1 scores on real-world datasets typically fall short of those achieved on benchmark datasets, underscoring the complexity of real-world multi-label classification tasks. Approaches leveraging deep learning techniques offer promising solutions by accommodating the hierarchical relationships and interdependencies among labels. With ongoing enhancements in deep learning algorithms and large-scale models, it is expected that the efficacy of multi-label classification tasks will be significantly improved, reaching a level of practical utility in the foreseeable future. Originality/value (1) Seven multi-label classification methods are comprehensively compared on three real-world datasets. (2) The TextCNN and TextRCNN models perform better on small-scale datasets with more complex hierarchical structure of labels and more balanced document-label distribution. (3) The ML k NN method works better on the larger-scale dataset with more unbalanced document-label distribution.

Biclustering-based multi-label classification

A Bayesian Network nearest k-labels method for Multi-label classification

A hybrid principal label space transformation-based ridge regression and decision tree for multi-label classification

Label Cluster Chains for Multi-Label Classification

A thorough experimental comparison of multilabel methods for classification performance

Classifier chains for multi-label classification

A novel bayesian network-based ensemble classifier chains for multi-label classification

New advances in enumerative biclustering algorithms with online partitioning

Learning Label Specific Features for Multi-label Classification.

Pseudo Labels for Imbalanced Multi-Label Learning

A Novel Learning-Based PLST Algorithm for Multi-Label Classification

Performance evaluation of seven multi-label classification methods on real-world patent and publication datasets

An efficient stacking model with label selection for multi-label classification

Representative Multi-Label Bayesian Approach for Image Classification

Joint Ranking SVM and Binary Relevance with Robust Low-Rank Learning for Multi-Label Classification

Multiobjective Fuzzy Biclustering In Microarray Data: Method And A New Performance Measure

A multi-birth metric learning framework based on binary constraints

A multi-objective clustering approach based on different clustering measures combinations

Multi-label classification by exploiting label correlations

Collaborative Multilabel Classification

Binary Linear Compression for Multi-label Classification.