Abstract:Speculative execution attacks exploiting speculative execution to leak secrets have aroused significant concerns in both industry and academia. They mainly exploit covert or side channels over microarchitectural states left by mis-speculated and squashed instructions (i.e., transient instructions). Most such attacks target cache states. Existing cache-based defenses against speculative execution attacks fall into two categories, Invisible and Undo. Most Invisible defenses buffer execution metadata of speculative instructions and place them into the cache only if the speculatively executed instructions become determined. Motivated by the fact that mis-speculations are rare cases, Undo defenses allow speculative instructions to modify cache states. Upon a mis-speculation, they rollback cache states to the ones prior to the execution of transient instructions. However, Invisible defenses have been recently found insecure by the speculative interference attack. This calls for a deep security inspection of Undo defenses against speculative execution attacks. In this paper, we present unXpec as the first attack against Undo-based safe speculation. It exploits the secret-dependent timing channel exhibited through the rollback operations of Undo defenses. Specifically, the rollback process requires both invalidating cache lines brought into the cache by transient instructions and restoring evicted cache lines from the cache by transiently loaded data. This opens up a channel that encodes secret via the timing difference between when rollback involves much invalidation and restoration or not. We further leverage eviction sets to enforce more restoration operations. This yields a longer rollback time and thus a larger secret-dependent timing difference. We demonstrate the timing channel over the open-source CleanupSpec, a representative Undo solution. A single transient load can trigger a secret-dependent timing difference of 22 cycles (without eviction sets) of 32 cycles (with eviction sets), which is sufficiently exploitable for constructing a covert channel for speculative execution attacks. We run unXpec on the gem5 simulator with CleanupSpec enabled. The results show that unXpec can leak secrets at a high rate of 140 Kbps with an accuracy over 90%. Simply enforcing constant-time rollback to mitigate unXpec may induce an over 70% performance overhead.

Catch You with Cache: Out-of-VM Introspection to Trace Malicious Executions.

CacheOut: Leaking Data on Intel CPUs via Cache Evictions

SpectreRewind: Leaking Secrets to Past Instructions

MeshUp: Stateless Cache Side-channel Attack on CPU Mesh

System Call Redirection: A Practical Approach to Meeting Real-World Virtual Machine Introspection Needs

Volcano: Stateless Cache Side-channel Attack by Exploiting Mesh Interconnect

unXpec: Breaking Undo-based Safe Speculation

Adversarial Prefetch: New Cross-Core Cache Side Channel Attacks

Retrofitting LBR Profiling to Enhance Virtual Machine Introspection

Investigating Timing Channel in IaaS

A Lightweight Live Memory Forensic Approach Based on Hardware Virtualization.

Heckler: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious Interrupts

Identification and Evaluation of Sharing Memory Covert Timing Channel in Xen Virtual Machines

Overtake: Achieving Meltdown-type Attacks with One Instruction

Exploiting Interfaces of Secure Encrypted Virtual Machines

Active and passive virtual machine introspection on AMD and ARM processors

JITScanner: Just-in-Time Executable Page Check in the Linux Operating System

A Shared Memory Based Cross-Vm Side Channel Attacks In Iaas Cloud

Detecting and Mitigating Cache Side Channel Threats on Intel SGX

On Code Execution Tracking Via Power Side-Channel

SegScope: Probing Fine-grained Interrupts Via Architectural Footprints