Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To measure passive tactile threshold of implant-supported single crowns (ISSC) in six orthogonal orientations, to analyze impact factors, and to guide the occlusal adjustment in a personalized manner. METHODS:The passive tactile thresholds of 24 implant-supported single crowns (5 maxillary anterior teeth, 7 maxillary posterior teeth and 12 mandibular posterior teeth) from 19 ISSC patients (8 men and 11 women, from 25 years old to 56 years old) were measured in six orthogonal orientations (four horizontal orientations of labial or buccal, lingual, mesial and distal, and two axial orientations of apical and coronal) using a digital test system for tactile function of teeth.SPSS 19.0 for windows was used to analyze impact factors, using double-sided test, with a significance level of 0.05. Paired-samples t test was used to test the difference between implant-supported single crowns and the controlled natural teeth, and between different time points. One-way ANOVA was used to test the difference between different orientations, maxilla-mandibular anterior-posterior, and men-women. RESULTS:The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC and control teeth were (1282 ± 709) and (40 ± 40) mN respectively. The difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.001). The passive tactile thresholds of buccal-lingual, mesial-distal and axial of ISSC were (1334 ± 696), (1102 ± 605) and (1412 ± 791) mN respectively, of which, the difference between mesial-distal and axial was of statistical significance (P < 0.05). The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC of maxillary anterior teeth, posterior teeth and mandibular posterior teeth were (1003 ± 616), (1302 ± 620) and (1386 ± 769) mN respectively, of which, the difference between maxillary anterior teeth and posterior teeth was of statistical significance (P < 0.05). The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC of men and women were (1751 ± 784) and (946 ± 393) mN respectively, the difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.001). The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC of one-week and one-month after wearing the teeth were (1421 ± 826) and (1411 ± 814) mN respectively, the difference was of no statistical significance (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The passive tactile threshold of ISSC was more than 65 times as much as that of the natural teeth. There was statistical significance between different orientations, between maxillary anterior and posterior teeth, and between men and women. No statistical significance was found between maxillary and madibular posterior teeth and between one-week and one-month after wearing the teeth.

Tactile Sensation of Natural Teeth and Dental Implants in the Somatosensory Cortex

Response of the Somatosensory Cortex Following Thermal Stimuli to Dental Implants.

The Role of Gingival Mechanoreceptors in the Tactile Function of Dental Implants

Response characteristics of the cat somatosensory cortex following the mechanical stimulation to non-vital and vital canine

Investigating the Role of Gingiva in Dental Implant Osseoperception at Cortical Responses Level

Investigating the role of gingiva in the tactile function of teeth at the cortical level

Response characteristics of the cat somatosensory cortex following the mechanical stimulation to endodontically treated teeth with overextension

Population response characteristics of intrinsic signals in the cat somatosensory cortex following canine mechanical stimulation.

Cortical Oscillatory Dynamics of Tactile Selective Sensation - for a Novel Type of Somatosensory Brain-computer Interface

The psychophysical assessments of tactile, temperature and electrical perception for implants with metal prosthetic surfaces

[Neuroplasticity in Patients with Implant Supported Full Dentures].

Neuroplasticity of Edentulous Patients with Implant-Supported Full Dentures.

[An Animal Study of Peripheral Neurophysiologic Mechanism in Osseoperception Phenomena of Dental Implant].

[Preliminary Study on Tactile Function of Implant-Supported Single Crowns].

Features of the Sensorimotor Cortex Altered after Tooth Loss and Subsequent Implant Placement in the Maxilla of Rats.

Biomimetic stimulation patterns drive natural artificial touch percepts using intracortical microstimulation in humans

[Animal Study of Sensory Function of Nerve Fibers Surrounding Dental Implant].

[Measurement of Tactile Threshold of Natural Teeth and Its Clinical Significance].

Intrinsic optical imaging study on cortical responses to electrical stimulation in ventral posterior medial nucleus of thalamus.

Somatosensory: Imaging Tactile Perception

Pain from Dental Implant Placement, Inflammatory Pulpitis Pain, and Neuropathic Pain Present Different Somatosensory Profiles