Effect of clinical decision support systems on clinical outcome for acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Youlu Zhao,Xizi Zheng,Jinwei Wang,Damin Xu,Shuangling Li,Jicheng Lv,Li Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02459-y
2021-01-01
BMC Nephrology
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Clinical decision support systems including both electronic alerts and care bundles have been developed for hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury. METHODS:Electronic databases were searched for randomized, before-after and cohort studies that implemented a clinical decision support system for hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury between 1990 and 2019. The studies must describe their impact on care processes, patient-related outcomes, or hospital length of stay. The clinical decision support system included both electronic alerts and care bundles. RESULTS:We identified seven studies involving 32,846 participants. Clinical decision support system implementation significantly reduced mortality (OR 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.75-0.99; p = 0.040, I2 = 65.3 %; n = 5 studies; N = 30,791 participants) and increased the proportion of acute kidney injury recognition (OR 3.12; 95 % CI, 2.37-4.10; p < 0.001, I2 = 77.1 %; n = 2 studies; N = 25,121 participants), and investigations (OR 3.07; 95 % CI, 2.91-3.24; p < 0.001, I2 = 0.0 %; n = 2 studies; N = 25,121 participants). CONCLUSIONS:Nonrandomized controlled trials of clinical decision support systems for acute kidney injury have yielded evidence of improved patient-centered outcomes and care processes. This review is limited by the low number of randomized trials and the relatively short follow-up period.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?