Stress testing and macroprudential regulation: a transatlantic assessment

Ronald W. Anderson

2016-01-01

Abstract:Since the onset of the Global Crisis in 2007-08, stress testing has emerged as a major component of the supervisory toolkit. This column introduces a new CEPR Press eBook that presents the perspectives of policymakers, stress test designers and academics on the remarkable development of a tool which ten years ago was little known.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Stress Testing the Banking System: Methodologies and Applications

Mario Quagliariello

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635618

2009-01-12

Abstract:Stress tests are quantitative tools used by banking supervisors and central banks for assessing the soundness of the financial system in the event of extreme, but still plausible, shocks (macroeconomic stress tests). They are also an important management instrument for banks since they provide financial institutions with useful indications on the reliability of the internal systems designed for the measurement of risks (microeconomic or prudential stress tests). Under the new Basel Accord on banks' capital adequacy the presence of sound stress testing methodologies is a prerequisite for the adoption of the advanced methods for the quantification of minimum capital requirements. Until the first half of 2007, the interest for stress testing had been circumscribed to practitioners, i.e., risk managers, central bankers and financial supervisors. Since then, the global financial system has been hit by deep turbulence's and all major economies have been affected by high volatility in financial markets, deterioration of the value of portfolios, widespread repricing of risk and severe liquidity drying up. It has been pointed out that the severity of the crisis has been largely due to its unexpected nature and that a more extensive and rigorous use of stress testing methodologies would have probably contributed to alleviate the intensity and the repercussions of the turmoil. In such a context, stress tests have become a key issue in policy discussions and a regular subject for newspapers' columnists. Notwithstanding the importance of the topic, books covering the different facets of macroeconomic stress testing are missing so far. While many articles have been published on specific issues and some textbooks deal with prudential stress tests, a systematic survey of methodologies and applications of macroeconomic stress testing is not available. This book aims at filling this gap, by providing practitioners and academics with a comprehensive and updated discussion of the theoretical underpinnings as well as the practical aspects of the implementation of such exercises. Prudential stress tests carried out by banks are not analysed in the book, even though it is not always practicable (and sensible) to distinguish them from macroeconomic stress tests. The book builds on the experience gained by the economists of many national and international financial authorities in their day-to-day surveillance activity. All the contributors have an extensive expertise in financial stability issues and stress testing methodologies. Obviously, due to space constraints some potential interesting applications may have been omitted. Nevertheless, the book - while not exhaustive - is wide-ranging and includes outstanding presentations of the most significant approaches as well as an inner description of the state-of-the-art in this field. While tailored for an expert readership, the book has the ambition to remain accessible to other readers, thanks to its plain language, clear explanation of the different issues, recurrent use of examples. The reader can either pick specific chapters of interest or easily move from simple to more complex topics as she progresses through the text.

Engineering,Economics,Business
Macroprudential Stress Tests and Policies: Searching for Robust and Implementable Frameworks

Ron Anderson,Jon Danielsson,Chikako Baba,Udaibir Das,Heedon Kang,Miguel Segoviano Basurto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484375839.001

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Macroprudential stress testing (MaPST) is becoming firmly embedded in the post-crisis policy-frameworks of financial-sectors around the world. MaPSTs can offer quantitative, forward-looking assessments of the resilience of financial systems as a whole, to particularly adverse shocks. Therefore, they are well suited to support the surveillance of macrofinancial vulnerabilities and to inform the use of macroprudential policy-instruments. This report summarizes the findings of a joint-research effort by MCM and the Systemic-Risk-Centre, which aimed at (i) presenting state-of-the-art approaches on MaPST, including modeling and implementation-challenges; (ii) providing a roadmap for future-research, and; (iii) discussing the potential uses of MaPST to support policy.
Macroprudential Stress Test of the Euro Area Banking System

Katarzyna Barbara Budnik,Mirco Balatti,Giovanni Covi,Ivan Dimitrov,Johannes Groß,Ib Hansen,Michael Kleemann,Tomas Reichenbachas,Francesco Sanna,Andrei Sarychev,Nadežda Siņenko,Matjaz Volk,Katharina Cera,Giovanni di Iasio,Margherita Giuzio,Harun Mirza,Diego Moccero,Giulio Nicoletti,Cosimo Pancaro,Spyros Palligkinis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3414174

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper presents an approach to a macroprudential stress test for the euro area banking system, comprising the 91 largest euro area credit institutions across 19 countries. The approach involves modelling banks’ reactions to changing economic conditions. It also examines the effects of adverse scenarios on economies and the financial system as a whole by acknowledging a broad set of interactions and interdependencies between banks, other market participants, and the real economy. Our results highlight the importance of the starting level of bank capital, bank asset quality, and banks’ adjustments for the propagation of shocks to the financial sector and real economy.
Systematic Systemic Stress Tests

T. Breuer,Martin Summer

Abstract:For a given set of banks, which economic and financial scenarios will lead to big losses? How big can losses in such scenarios possibly get? These are the two central questions of macro stress tests. We believe that most current macro stress testing models have deficits in answering these questions. They select stress scenarios in a way which might leave aside many dangerous scenarios and thus create an illusion of safety; and which might consider highly implausible scenarios and thus trigger a false alarm. With respect to loss evaluation most stress tests do not include tools to analyse systemic risk arising from the interactions of banks with each other and with the markets. We make a conceptual proposal how these shortcomings may be addressed and how stress tests could be made both systematic and systemic. We demonstrate the application of our concepts using publicly available data on European banks and capital markets, in particular the EBA 2016 stress test results.

Business,Economics
Environmental sustainability and financial stability: can macroprudential stress testing measure and mitigate climate-related systemic financial risk?

Mercy Berman DeMenno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00207-2

2022-11-29

Journal of Banking Regulation

Abstract:Despite widespread recognition among financial regulators and central banks that climate change may threaten financial stability, the causes and consequences of climate-related systemic financial risk remain underexplored. Stress testing has emerged as one of the most prevalent regulatory tools for addressing climate-related financial risks, and this article analyzes the role of stress testing in mitigating the effects of climate change on financial stability. Specifically, it synthesizes the multi-disciplinary literature on climate-related financial risk, financial stability, and stress testing to develop a framework for evaluating the capacity and effectiveness of stress tests for measuring and managing climate-related systemic financial risk. It then takes stock of climate stress testing proposals and early practices globally and applies the evaluative framework in comparative case studies of the Bank of England and US Federal Reserve. It concludes that stress testing can support the measurement and management of both microprudential and macroprudential climate-related financial risks, but the benefits of stress testing vis-à-vis climate change and financial stability are largely unrealized. Addressing the disconnect between climate stress testing policy motivation and implementation as well as the divergence between leading and lagging jurisdictions will require both interagency and international regulatory cooperation.
Macro Stress Testing On Credit Risk Of Commercial Banks In China

rongjie tian,jiawen yang

2010-01-01

Abstract:In recent years, a lot of effort has been put into stress testing on credit risk of banks all over the world. The New Basel Capital Accord, Basel Ⅱ, imposes the rigorous stress testing requirements: banks which implement the Internal Ratings-Based Approach (IRB) must conduct stress tests. The China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) also requires all Chinese commercial banks to implement stress testing to manage credit risk. During the current financial crisis, stress testing on credit risk became a reviving focus of concern. Macro stress testing refers to a range of techniques used to assess the vulnerability of a financial system to “exceptional but plausible” macroeconomic shocks (see Blaschke et al, 2001 and Sorge, 2004). Most researchers design macro stress testing by modeling the link between macroeconomic variables and credit risk measures. Sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, and extreme values are usually employed to implement the stress testing.
The Process of Macroprudential Oversight in Europe

Peter Sarlin,Henrik J. Nyman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12255

2015-08-17

Global Policy

Abstract:Abstract The 2007–2008 financial crisis has paved the way for the use of macroprudential policies in supervising the financial system as a whole. This article views macroprudential oversight in Europe as a process, a sequence of activities with the ultimate aim of safeguarding financial stability. To conceptualize a process in this context, we introduce the notion of a public collaborative process ( PCP ). PCP s involve multiple organizations with a common objective, where a number of dispersed organizations cooperate under various unstructured forms and take a collaborative approach to reaching the final goal. We argue that PCP s can and should essentially be managed using the tools and practices common for business processes. To this end, we conduct an assessment of process readiness for macroprudential oversight in Europe. Based upon interviews with key European policy makers and supervisors, we provide an analysis model to assess the maturity of five process enablers for macroprudential oversight. With the results of our analysis, we give clear recommendations on the areas that need further attention when macroprudential oversight is being developed, in addition to providing a general purpose framework for monitoring the impact of improvement efforts.

political science,international relations
COVID-19 Pandemic and Stress Testing the Eurozone Credit Portfolios

Larisa Yarovaya,Nawazish Mirza,Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi,Bushra Naqvi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3705474

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This research conduct stress tests to assess the impact of COVID-19 drag on loan portfolios of 255 credit institutions in ten most affected EU member states. We employ quarterly data at the firm level to segregate the credit exposures into seven categories of consumers and corporate borrowers. Based on the macro and micro level model specifications, and using six distressed economic scenarios, our results indicate a significant deterioration in asset quality across exposure types, institutional size, and countries’ profile. We also document a substantial increase in the probability of default and a considerable reduction in capital adequacy across our sample.
Transparency and Model Evolution in Stress Testing

Mark J. Flannery,Mark Jeffrey Flannery

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431679

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Bank stress tests must be revisable in order to cope with new, emerging risks in the financial sector. Some of these revisions will likely involve model parameters, in addition to the macro-variable shocks that have been applied heretofore. The potential for such revisions would be handicapped by making the test models fully transparent to the public. This tension makes it inadvisable to share model parameters widely if the stress tests are to remain an informative component of the supervisory system for large banks.
COVID-19: stress-testing non-financial companies: a macroprudential perspective. The experience of Poland

Natalia Nehrebecka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-020-00163-0

2021-03-03

Eurasian Economic Review

Abstract:The main purpose of this article is to detail and supply a stress-testing framework at the individual level that investigates the impact of COVID-19 scenarios on non-financial firms' probability of default as regards domestic and foreign-currency debt (a so-called new micro stress-test). The test addresses both the uniform and the asymmetrical transmission of shocks, in relation to sizes of firms and sectors of their activity. To allow for the running of micro stress-tests of this kind, a general model was constructed using a two-step approach comprising a microeconomic model and a macroeconomic module. Accompanying empirical analysis was based on individual data from different sources (relating to the years 2007–2020), i.e. prudential reporting, business registration, financial and behavioral data and balances of payments. In line with the factor of company size, the quality of loan portfolios is shown to deteriorate on the balance sheets of banks in all segments in the case of a negative scenario (for large and medium-sized enterprises the probability of default increases 1.5-fold, for small ones over threefold). While almost all industries will experience the impact of COVID-19, sections being hit particularly hard will involve services that, due to the ban on gatherings of people and the recommendation to avoid crowds, will lose most of their revenue and will fail to make up for this loss in the future.
Financial networks and stress testing: Challenges and new research avenues for systemic risk analysis and financial stability implications

Stefano Battiston,Serafin Martinez-Jaramillo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2018.03.010

IF: 3.554

2018-04-01

Journal of Financial Stability

Abstract:Network models, stress testing methods and early warning systems are attracting growing interest both among scholars and practitioners. In this short paper, we illustrate some of the insights they have to offer both in terms of new fundamental scientific understanding of the emergence systemic risk and in terms of concrete applications to the policy areas of financial stability and macro-prudential policy. Finally, we discuss new research pathways to address the challenging questions still open, including multiplex networks, big financial data, and climate-finance.

economics,business, finance
Leveraging the network: a stress-test framework based on DebtRank

Stefano Battiston,Marco D'Errico,Stefano Gurciullo,Guido Caldarelli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.00621

2016-02-23

Abstract:We develop a novel stress-test framework to monitor systemic risk in financial systems. The modular structure of the framework allows to accommodate for a variety of shock scenarios, methods to estimate interbank exposures and mechanisms of distress propagation. The main features are as follows. First, the framework allows to estimate and disentangle not only first-round effects (i.e. shock on external assets) and second-round effects (i.e. distress induced in the interbank network), but also third-round effects induced by possible fire sales. Second, it allows to monitor at the same time the impact of shocks on individual or groups of financial institutions as well as their vulnerability to shocks on counterparties or certain asset classes. Third, it includes estimates for loss distributions, thus combining network effects with familiar risk measures such as VaR and CVaR. Fourth, in order to perform robustness analyses and cope with incomplete data, the framework features a module for the generation of sets of networks of interbank exposures that are coherent with the total lending and borrowing of each bank. As an illustration, we carry out a stress-test exercise on a dataset of listed European banks over the years 2008-2013. We find that second-round and third-round effects dominate first-round effects, therefore suggesting that most current stress-test frameworks might lead to a severe underestimation of systemic risk.

Risk Management,General Finance
Banking on resilience: EU macroprudential policy and systemic risk

Ashleigh Neill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.058

IF: 3.399

2024-04-02

International Review of Economics & Finance

Abstract:This study examines the effectiveness of macroprudential policies on banking systemic risk for 172 European banks across 20 EU countries from 2000 to 2017. Using a dynamic panel framework, it assesses the effectiveness of policy on two dimensions of systemic risk: banks' contribution to aggregate systemic risk ( ΔCoVaR ) and their vulnerability in stressed markets ( Exposure-ΔCoVaR ). Results show policy actions reduce bank systemic risk, especially in terms of Exposure-ΔCoVaR . However, this effect varies between tightening and loosening measures. Interestingly, the analysis indicates that policies don't significantly affect banks' contribution to systemic risk as measured by ΔCoVaR . Borrower-based policies and exposure limits in particular enhance bank resilience. This study has important implications for policymakers regarding the calibration and evaluation of macroprudential measures.

economics,business, finance
Bank supervision between risk reduction and economic renewal

Shawn Donnelly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2183391

2023-03-17

Journal of European Integration

Abstract:This paper investigates specific challenges of Covid for balancing economic growth and financial stability as they apply to paradigms, programmes and policies of bank regulation and supervision at the European Commission and European Central Bank. It finds that dominant paradigms of risk reduction and control remained intact, despite a temporary programme of regulatory relaxation to spur credit growth. The ECB and the Commission were united on state aid, regulatory loosening and promoting credit creation. However, while the Commission sought credit for businesses, much of the credit went into the European housing sector, with ECB support.

political science,international relations
SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO STRESS TESTING OF BANKING RISKS

Oksana Yaroshevska,Aviation University,Maksym Orlov,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200/2023-3-18

2023-01-01

PROBLEMS OF SYSTEMIC APPROACH IN THE ECONOMY

Abstract:The article reveals the essence of stress testing as a tool for assessing the reliability and stability of economic and technical systems. Based on a retrospective approach, the evolution of stress testing of banking risks in the world and in Ukraine is systematized. A comparative assessment of the definitions of stress testing of banking risks provided by international financial organizations and the national regulator was carried out, and their common and distinctive features were determined. It is shown that according to the level of stress testing of banking risks, it is divided into macro- and microeconomic, their comparison is made, advantages and disadvantages are determined. The main macro- and microeconomic risk factors recommended by the NBU for stress testing are systematized. The content of the banking risk stress testing system has been formalized, its elements have been identified: purpose, tasks, objects, methods, criteria for the effectiveness of stress testing scenarios, models of their formation, assumptions regarding the level of risk, components of the analysis, basic requirements for implementation, main stages. The main methods of stress testing banking risks and types of predicted losses are summarized, their content and main tools are disclosed. It is shown that the most common method of stress testing is the development of scenarios. Systematized NBU requirements for: development of internal bank documents regarding the organization and procedure of stress testing; to the functioning of the information system regarding risk management and reporting in stressful situations; responsibilities of the Chief Risk Manager in terms of communications with the bank's top management and the use of stress testing results for management decision-making. The directions for improving stress testing are substantiated: taking into account real shocks to the financial system, the speed of the spread of crises between countries, expanding the range of risks that are taken into account when building scenarios; regular and systematic implementation, constant review of methods and shock factors; ensuring proper practical use of results; adjusting strategies and plans to reduce banking risks.
Stress relief? Funding structures and resilience to the covid shock

Kristin Forbes,Christian Friedrich,Dennis Reinhardt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2023.05.005

Abstract:How did funding structures-the source, instrument, currency, and counterparty location of financing-relate to the financial stress experienced in different countries and sectors during Covid-19? Banks and corporates with a higher share of funding from non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) or in US dollars experienced significantly greater stress, while more funding in debt instruments (versus loans) or cross-border (versus domestically) did not affect resilience. Policies targeting these structural vulnerabilities (US$ swap lines and NBFI policies) were more effective at mitigating stress than policies supporting banks, even controlling for macroeconomic policies. Macroprudential regulations should prioritize exposures to NBFI and dollar funding.
Stress Tests, Information Disclosure, and Credit Line Runs

JOSE E. GUTIERREZ,LUIS FERNÁNDEZ LAFUERZA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13242

IF: 1.963

2024-11-20

Journal of money credit and banking

Abstract:The public disclosure of bank‐level stress test results, while informative for market participants, can adversely affect underperforming entities. We uncover a novel cost of disclosing unfavorable stress test results: credit line runs. Using Spanish Credit Register data and the 2011 European Banking Authority stress test, we find that, after results were released, firms drew down about 10 percentage points more available funds from credit lines granted by banks with poor stress test performance. In addition, these banks reduced credit line sizes more before the release and were more likely to cut term lending to firms without credit lines afterward.

economics,business, finance
Macroprudential capital regulation and fiscal balances in the euro area

Nikolay Hristov,Oliver Hülsewig,Benedikt Kolb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103074

IF: 2.762

2024-04-07

Journal of International Money and Finance

Abstract:We examine the fiscal footprint of macroprudential policy in euro area countries arising through the bond market channel ( Reis, 2021 ). Using local projections, we estimate impulse responses of the fiscal balance to an unexpected tightening in macroprudential capital regulation. Our findings suggest a dichotomy between country groups. In peripheral countries, the cyclically adjusted primary balance ratio deteriorates after a restrictive capital-based macroprudential policy shock. Since banks are important investors in domestic government debt, the shift in the public budget toward higher borrowing after the innovation might pose a threat to financial stability to the extent that sovereign risk increases. By contrast, in core countries, the cyclically adjusted primary balance ratio barely reacts to a sudden tightening in capital regulation.

business, finance
Stress test precision and bank competition

Diego Moreno,Tuomas Takalo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111702

IF: 1.469

2024-04-12

Economics Letters

Abstract:We study a banking sector in which banks choose their asset portfolios and, upon the public disclosure of stress test results, raise funding by promising investors a repayment. Competitive banks must gamble, choosing assets that are riskier the more precise is the stress test. Allocative efficiency, however, improves with precision. When risk taking is not too sensitive to the precision of information, maximal transparency maximizes both stability and surplus. In contrast, banks with market power select safer assets, and opacity maximizes stability, as well the surplus if the social cost of bank failure is significant.

economics
The Thinking of Construction of Macro-Prudential Regulation in Post-Crisis Era

HU Jian-sheng,WU Qing,ZHOU Chang-fu,LU Cai-lan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-148x.2011.10.021

2011-01-01

Abstract:Inadequate financial supervision gave great impetus to this international financial crisis.Over-innovation of financial product originated from regulation arbitrage,pro-cyclicality effect under micro-prudential regulation,inadequate supervision of Shadow bank system and systematically important bank increased the depth of the crisis.Hence,future tasks of macro-prudential supervision should aim to enlarge regulation scope,control systemic risk,cooperate integrally among central bank,financial institutions and supervision department.Central bank must curb liquidity from the source accompanied the reshaping of the function of central bank.But implementation of macro-prudential regulation will face some uncertain factors.

Stress testing and macroprudential regulation: a transatlantic assessment

Stress Testing the Banking System: Methodologies and Applications

Macroprudential Stress Tests and Policies: Searching for Robust and Implementable Frameworks

Macroprudential Stress Test of the Euro Area Banking System

Systematic Systemic Stress Tests

Environmental sustainability and financial stability: can macroprudential stress testing measure and mitigate climate-related systemic financial risk?

Macro Stress Testing On Credit Risk Of Commercial Banks In China

The Process of Macroprudential Oversight in Europe

COVID-19 Pandemic and Stress Testing the Eurozone Credit Portfolios

Transparency and Model Evolution in Stress Testing

COVID-19: stress-testing non-financial companies: a macroprudential perspective. The experience of Poland

Financial networks and stress testing: Challenges and new research avenues for systemic risk analysis and financial stability implications

Leveraging the network: a stress-test framework based on DebtRank

Banking on resilience: EU macroprudential policy and systemic risk

Bank supervision between risk reduction and economic renewal

SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO STRESS TESTING OF BANKING RISKS

Stress relief? Funding structures and resilience to the covid shock

Stress Tests, Information Disclosure, and Credit Line Runs

Macroprudential capital regulation and fiscal balances in the euro area

Stress test precision and bank competition

The Thinking of Construction of Macro-Prudential Regulation in Post-Crisis Era