A Male-ABCD Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Prediction in HBsAg Carriers

Yuting Wang,Minjie Wang,He Li,Kun Chen,Hongmei Zeng,Xinyu Bi,Zheng Zhu,Yuchen Jiao,Yong Wang,Jian Zhu,Hui Zhao,Xiang Liu,Chunyun Dai,Chunsun Fang,Can Zhao,Deyin Guo,Hong Zhao,Jianguo Zhou,Dongmei Wang,Zhiyuan Wu,Xinming Zhao,Wei Cui,Xuehong Zhang,Jianqiang Cai,Wanqing Chen,Chunfeng Qu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.03.07
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers shows gender disparity, influenced by underlying liver diseases that display variations in laboratory tests. We aimed to construct a risk-stratified HCC prediction model for HBsAg-positive male adults. Methods HBsAg-positive males of 35−69 years old (N=6,153) were included from a multi-center population-based liver cancer screening study. Randomly, three centers were set as training, the other three centers as validation. Within 2 years since initiation, we administrated at least two rounds of HCC screening using B-ultrasonography and α-fetoprotein (AFP). We used logistic regression models to determine potential risk factors, built and examined the operating characteristics of a point-based algorithm for HCC risk prediction. Results With 2 years of follow-up, 302 HCC cases were diagnosed. A male-ABCD algorithm was constructed including participant’s age, blood levels of GGT (γ-glutamyl-transpeptidase), counts of platelets, white cells, concentration of DCP (des-γ-carboxy-prothrombin) and AFP, with scores ranging from 0 to 18.3. The area under receiver operating characteristic was 0.91 (0.90−0.93), larger than existing models. At 1.5 points of risk score, 26.10% of the participants in training cohort and 14.94% in validation cohort were recognized at low risk, with sensitivity of identifying HCC remained 100%. At 2.5 points, 46.51% of the participants in training cohort and 33.68% in validation cohort were recognized at low risk with 99.06% and 97.78% of sensitivity, respectively. At 4.5 points, only 20.86% of participants in training cohort and 23.73% in validation cohort were recognized at high risk, with positive prediction value of 22.85% and 12.35%, respectively. Conclusions Male-ABCD algorithm identified individual’s risk for HCC occurrence within short term for their HCC precision surveillance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?