Abstract:To the Editor: Immunosenescence is associated with increased infection and cancer risk.1McElhaney J.E. Effros R.B. Immunosenescence: what does it mean to health outcomes in older adults?.Curr Opin Immunol. 2009; 21: 418-424Crossref PubMed Scopus (239) Google Scholar We hypothesized that shingles and pneumonia (infectious diseases that increase with age), serving as possible markers of immunosenescence, would be associated with an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We examined this hypothesis in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), which was established in 1976 with 121,700 female nurses age 30 to 55 years, and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), which was established in 1986 with 51,529 male health professionals age 40 to 75 years. In both cohorts, questionnaire follow-up occurs biennially. The institutional review boards of Partners Health Care System and Harvard School of Public Health approved these studies. In 2000 (NHS) and 2004 (HPFS) and periodically thereafter, participants were asked whether they ever had physician-diagnosed shingles and if so, in what year they were diagnosed. In 2004 (NHS) and 1992 (HPFS), the cohort members were asked whether they had ever received a diagnosis of pneumonia and if so, the year of the diagnosis, with periodic follow-up for incident cases. Participants reported BCC and SCC biennially from 1984 (NHS) and 1986 (HPFS). Self-reports of SCC were confirmed by medical record and pathology report review; self-report of BCC is highly accurate in both cohorts.2van Dam R.M. Huang Z. Giovannucci E. et al.Diet and basal cell carcinoma of the skin in a prospective cohort of men.Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 71: 135-141Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar, 3Colditz G.A. Martin P. Stampfer M.J. et al.Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women.Am J Epidemiol. 1986; 123: 894-900Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar We excluded nonwhite participants and those who had died or had a history of any skin cancer at baseline. Participants were followed for incident BCC and SCC with a baseline of 1996 in the NHS and 1986 (for shingles) or 1990 (for pneumonia) in the HPFS. Person-time of follow-up was calculated from the return of the baseline questionnaire to the date of death, diagnosis of any skin cancer, loss to follow-up, or end of follow-up (June 1, 2012, in the case of the NHS and January 1, 2010, in the case of the HPFS), whichever came first. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of BCC and SCC associated with shingles and pneumonia in each cohort followed by pooling of multivariable results with use of random-effects meta-analysis. We performed analyses stratified by age at baseline (younger and older than the median age) and used the Q statistic for heterogeneity to test for differences between strata. We used SAS software (version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) for statistical analyses. All statistical tests were 2 tailed, and the significance level was set at a P value less than .05. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table I. Risk of BCC was increased in those with a history of shingles (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.23) and pneumonia (HR, 1.07; 95% CI,1.01-1.13) (Table II). The relationship between shingles and SCC was positive but not significant (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.88-1.58). There was an increased risk of SCC associated with pneumonia (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.42). There were no significant differences in the pooled analysis results stratified by age, suggesting that individuals' immunosenescence may occur at different ages. Limitations include the possibility of residual confounding, particularly by immunosuppression; the possibility of detection bias; and the fact that in the early years of the cohorts reports of year of diagnosis shingles and year of diagnosis of pneumonia were retrospective.Table ICharacteristics according to baseline shingles and pneumonia status among Nurses' Health Study participants in 1996 and Health Professionals Follow-up Study participants in 1986 (shingles) and 1990 (pneumonia)CharacteristicNo shinglesShinglesNo pneumoniaPneumoniaNurses' Health Studyn = 71,288n = 4060n = 71,860n = 3488Age at baseline, y∗Value is not age-adjusted.61.4 (7.1)63.7 (7.0)61.6 (7.1)61.8 (6.8)Mean annual UV flux (×10−4 RB count) (SD)123.2 (25.6)123.4 (26.0)123.2 (25.6)123.7 (26.2)≥6 severe or blistering sunburns, %20.020.220.021.7≥6 moles on the arm, %4.45.24.54.5Painful burn/blistering reaction as a child/adolescent, %13.615.313.615.8Alcohol consumption, g/d5.0 (9.0)5.0 (9.3)5.0 (9.0)5.0 (9.2)Current smokers, %12.811.112.812.1Physical examination in the past 2 y, %93.696.893.697.3Family history of melanoma, %2.32.72.32.2Red/blonde hair, %14.915.814.915.4Asthma, %8.09.87.716.8Emphysema, %3.24.43.038.3Health Professionals Follow-up Studyn = 42,416n = 1299n = 39,950n = 837Age at baseline, y∗Value is not age-adjusted.53.9 (9.7)54.4 (9.1)59.3 (9.6)65.2 (9.2)Mean annual UV flux (×10−4 RB count) (SD)129.8 (27.4)130.9 (27.7)129.50 (27.26)128.6 (27.4)≥6 severe or blistering sunburns, %35.438.634.939.7≥6 moles on the arm, %5.45.45.46.7Painful burn/blistering reaction as a child/adolescent, %25.027.924.427.7Alcohol consumption, g/d12.0 (16.2)12.5 (16.3)10.2 (14.3)11.4 (17.0)Current smokers, %18.014.715.115.6Physical examination in the past 2 y, %78.680.083.895.9Family history of melanoma, %1.71.62.75.3Red/blonde hair, %13.916.013.715.1Asthma, %5.25.46.115.0Emphysema, %1.62.01.54.6Information on dietary factors, including consumption of alcohol, were repeatedly collected by using a validated food frequency questionnaire at least every 4 years during the follow-up. Data on major skin cancer risk factors were collected on follow-up questionnaires; the data collected included the following: ethnicity, family history of melanoma in first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, or offspring), natural hair color at an early age (age 21 years in the Nurses' Health Study and age 18 years in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study); number of moles on the arms, skin reaction after prolonged sun exposure as a child/adolescent, number of severe or blistering sunburns and cumulative ultraviolet flux since baseline (a measure of long-term UV exposure). History of asthma, emphysema, other cancers and whether participants underwent physical examination by a physician were assessed during regular cohort follow-up.RB, Robertson-Berger; UV, ultraviolet.∗ Value is not age-adjusted. Open table in a new tab Table IIRisk of BCC and SCC associated with shingles and pneumoniaDiseasePerson-yearsCases of BCCAge-adjusted HR (95% CI)MV-adjusted HR (95% CI)BCC ShinglesNHSNo shingles818,52410,354RefRefShingles104,50716951.12 (1.06-1.18)1.10 (1.04-1.16)HPFSNo shingles755,8539193RefRefShingles43,7927301.23 (1.14-1.32)1.19 (1.10-1.29)PooledNo shinglesRefShingles1.14 (1.05-1.23) PneumoniaNHSNo pneumonia862,38111,105RefRefPneumonia60,6509441.11 (1.04-1.18)1.09 (1.02-1.16)∗Additionally adjusted for history of asthma and emphysema.HPFSNo pneumonia522,0477010RefRefPneumonia34,2865541.05 (0.96-1.15)1.04 (0.95-1.14)∗Additionally adjusted for history of asthma and emphysema.PooledNo pneumoniaRefPneumonia1.07 (1.01-1.13)SCC ShinglesNHSNo shingles824,1411000RefRefShingles105,3581521.03 (0.87-1.22)1.01 (0.85-1.20)HPFSNo shingles769,0321181RefRefShingles44,3871281.47 (1.22-1.77)1.37 (1.14-1.65)PooledNo shinglesRefShingles1.18 (0.88-1.58) PneumoniaNHSNo pneumonia868,4091046RefRefPneumonia61,0891061.32 (1.08-1.61)1.29 (1.05-1.57)∗Additionally adjusted for history of asthma and emphysema.HPFSNo pneumonia532,6041021RefRefPneumonia35,482991.14 (0.93-1.41)1.16 (0.94-1.43)∗Additionally adjusted for history of asthma and emphysema.PooledNo pneumoniaRefPneumonia1.23 (1.06-1.42)Multivariable models adjusted for ultraviolet flux (quintiles), skin reaction to sun exposure as a child/adolescent (none/some redness, burn, and/or painful burn/blisters), number of lifetime blistering sunburns (0, 1-2, 3-5, or ≥6), number of arm moles (0, 1-2, 3-5, or ≥6), natural hair color (red, blonde, light brown, dark brown, or black), family history of melanoma, diagnosis of any nonskin cancers, smoking (past history of <10, 10-20, 20-40, or ≥40 pack-years or current smoker), alcohol consumption (0, 0.1-4.9, 5-9.9, 10-19.9, or ≥20 g/d), and having a physical examination by a physician. The most recent information for time-varying variables (eg, smoking status) before each follow-up interval were used to take into account potential changes over the follow-up. The most recent information for time-varying variables (eg, smoking status) before each follow-up interval were used to take into account potential changes over the follow-up. We conducted sensitivity analyses (1) excluding participants who did not report having a physical examination by a physician and (2) for the analyses in HPFS with shingles as the exposure, excluding those who reported having received the shingles vaccine (asked on the 2008 questionnaire) and using only radiography-confirmed cases of pneumonia in HPFS (radiography confirmation was conducted up to 2002).BCC, Basal cell carcinoma; CI, confidence interval; HPFS, Health Professional's Follow-up Study; HR, hazard ratio; MV, multivariable; NHS, Nurses' Health Study; Ref, reference; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.∗ Additionally adjusted for history of asthma and emphysema. Open table in a new tab Information on dietary factors, including consumption of alcohol, were repeatedly collected by using a validated food frequency questionnaire at least every 4 years during the follow-up. Data on major skin cancer risk factors were collected on follow-up questionnaires; the data collected included the following: ethnicity, family history of melanoma in first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, or offspring), natural hair color at an early age (age 21 years in the Nurses' Health Study and age 18 years in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study); number of moles on the arms, skin reaction after prolonged sun exposure as a child/adolescent, number of severe or blistering sunburns and cumulative ultraviolet flux since baseline (a measure of long-term UV exposure). History of asthma, emphysema, other cancers and whether participants underwent physical examination by a physician were assessed during regular cohort follow-up. RB, Robertson-Berger; UV, ultraviolet. Multivariable models adjusted for ultraviolet flux (quintiles), skin reaction to sun exposure as a child/adolescent (none/some redness, burn, and/or painful burn/blisters), number of lifetime blistering sunburns (0, 1-2, 3-5, or ≥6), number of arm moles (0, 1-2, 3-5, or ≥6), natural hair color (red, blonde, light brown, dark brown, or black), family history of melanoma, diagnosis of any nonskin cancers, smoking (past history of <10, 10-20, 20-40, or ≥40 pack-years or current smoker), alcohol consumption (0, 0.1-4.9, 5-9.9, 10-19.9, or ≥20 g/d), and having a physical examination by a physician. The most recent information for time-varying variables (eg, smoking status) before each follow-up interval were used to take into account potential changes over the follow-up. The most recent information for time-varying variables (eg, smoking status) before each follow-up interval were used to take into account potential changes over the follow-up. We conducted sensitivity analyses (1) excluding participants who did not report having a physical examination by a physician and (2) for the analyses in HPFS with shingles as the exposure, excluding those who reported having received the shingles vaccine (asked on the 2008 questionnaire) and using only radiography-confirmed cases of pneumonia in HPFS (radiography confirmation was conducted up to 2002). BCC, Basal cell carcinoma; CI, confidence interval; HPFS, Health Professional's Follow-up Study; HR, hazard ratio; MV, multivariable; NHS, Nurses' Health Study; Ref, reference; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. In summary, the risk of BCC after shingles and pneumonia was modestly increased. The results for SCC were less consistent but suggestive of an association. These associations were substantially lower than that with immunosuppression after renal transplantation, which is associated with a greater than 10-fold increased risk.4Hartevelt M.M. Bavinck J.N. Kootte A.M. Vermeer B.J. Vandenbroucke J.P. Incidence of skin cancer after renal transplantation in The Netherlands.Transplantation. 1990; 49: 506-509Crossref PubMed Scopus (579) Google Scholar Studies to replicate our findings in population-based data sets and to investigate possible immunosenescence mechanisms are warranted. We are indebted to the participants and staff of the NHS and the HPFS for their valuable contributions as well as to the following state cancer registries for their help: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. We would also like to thank Ernesto Llamado and Jeanette Torres for their help with submission of this manuscript. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.

Abstract:body mass index confidence interval Nurses' Health Study II Rotating night-shift work causes chronic circadian misalignment between the endogenous circadian timing system and behavioral cycles and suppresses the secretion of melatonin (James et al., 2007James F.O. Cermakian N. Boivin D.B. Circadian rhythms of melatonin, cortisol, and clock gene expression during simulated night shift work.Sleep. 2007; 30: 1427-1436PubMed Google Scholar; Scheer et al., 2009Scheer F.A. Hilton M.F. Mantzoros C.S. et al.Adverse metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of circadian misalignment.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 4453-4458Crossref PubMed Scopus (1497) Google Scholar). Melatonin has been found to regulate the inflammatory response and have antioxidant effects (Bonnefont-Rousselot and Collin, 2010Bonnefont-Rousselot D. Collin F. Melatonin: action as antioxidant and potential applications in human disease and aging.Toxicology. 2010; 278: 55-67Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar; Ochoa et al., 2011Ochoa J.J. Diaz-Castro J. Kajarabille N. et al.Melatonin supplementation ameliorates oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling induced by strenuous exercise in adult human males.J Pineal Res. 2011; 51: 373-380Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar), which may thereby protect against psoriasis. One prior study showed that psoriatics had reduced plasma melatonin (Mozzanica et al., 1988Mozzanica N. Tadini G. Radaelli A. et al.Plasma melatonin levels in psoriasis.Acta Derm Venereol. 1988; 68: 312-316PubMed Google Scholar). A growing body of literature provides evidence linking night-shift work with various health conditions, including psoriasis comorbidities such as coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes (Kawachi et al., 1995Kawachi I. Colditz G.A. Stampfer M.J. et al.Prospective study of shift work and risk of coronary heart disease in women.Circulation. 1995; 92: 3178-3182Crossref PubMed Scopus (393) Google Scholar; Gelfand et al., 2006Gelfand J.M. Neimann A.L. Shin D.B. et al.Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis.JAMA. 2006; 296: 1735-1741Crossref PubMed Scopus (1490) Google Scholar; Pan et al., 2011Pan A. Schernhammer E.S. Sun Q. et al.Rotating night shift work and risk of type 2 diabetes: two prospective cohort studies in women.PLoS Med. 2011; 8: e1001141Crossref PubMed Scopus (541) Google Scholar; Li et al., 2012bLi W. Han J. Hu F.B. et al.Psoriasis and risk of type 2 diabetes among women and men in the United States: a population-based cohort study.J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132: 291-298Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar). However, no direct evidence of an association between night-shift work and psoriasis is available. Here, we evaluated the association between rotating night-shift work and incident risk of psoriasis in two large, prospective cohort studies, the Nurses' Health study (NHS) (1988–2008) and NHS II (1989–2005). Details on the cohorts and ascertainment of psoriasis have been described previously (Li et al., 2012bLi W. Han J. Hu F.B. et al.Psoriasis and risk of type 2 diabetes among women and men in the United States: a population-based cohort study.J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132: 291-298Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar). Participants responded to clinician-diagnosed psoriasis in the 2008 (NHS) or 2005 (NHS II) questionnaires with high validity. Participants were asked about lifetime years working in rotating night shifts in the 1988 (NHS) and 1989 (NHS II) questionnaires. We classified participants into two major categories: never or ever working in rotating night shifts. The participants were further categorized by the duration of shift work: 1–2, 3–9, or ≥10 years. Information on covariates was collected from the questionnaires biennially. From the responders to the follow-up beginning and ending questionnaires, we excluded psoriasis prevalent cases, unknown diagnosis date, and unknown status of night-shift work: 62,487 in NHS and 95,561 in NHS II remained in the analysis. We calculated person-years of follow-up for each participant from the return date of 1988 (NHS) or 1989 (NHS II) questionnaire to the date of diagnosis of psoriasis, or the end of follow-up (June 2008 for NHS and June 2005 for NHS II), whichever came first. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for 2-year time intervals were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of developing psoriasis in night-shift workers, adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol intake, and physical activity. The time-varying covariates were updated in the analysis. For the combined analysis, we tested the between-studies heterogeneity and estimated the overall association using meta-analysis. The institutional review board of Brigham and Women's Hospital approved this study. In NHS, 58.8% reported ever working in rotating night shifts for at least 1 year, with 10.9% reporting ≥10 years of rotating night-shift work. In NHS II, 61.6% reported ever working in rotating night shifts, with 4.5% working for ≥10 years. In both cohorts, those ever working in rotating night shifts tended to have a higher BMI and were more likely to be physically active or current smokers (Table 1). Overall, 1,887 incident psoriasis cases were identified during follow-up. Compared with those who reported no night-shift work, those ever working in rotating night shifts at baseline had a significantly increased risk of psoriasis. The multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) was 1.26 (1.09–1.47) in NHS, 1.14 (1.01–1.28) in NHS II, and 1.19 (1.07–1.32) in combined cohorts. We evaluated the risk of psoriasis by duration of rotating night-shift work, and the multivariate-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) in the combined cohorts were 1.20 (1.07–1.34), 1.17 (1.00–1.38), and 1.23 (1.03–1.47) for 1–2, 3–9, and ≥10 years of working in rotating night shifts, respectively (Table 2). Further adjustments by parity, postmenopausal hormone use, depression, personal history of psoriasis comorbidities, as well as sleep and snore frequency (only for NHS), did not appreciably change the results.Table 1Age-standardized baseline characteristics of the study participants by status of working rotating night shifts: Nurses' Health Study (NHS) (1988) and NHS II (1989)1Values are means (SD) or percentages and are standardized to the age distribution of the study population.NHS working rotating night shiftsNHS II working rotating night shiftsCharacteristicNever (n=25,765)Ever (n=36,722)P-value2P-values are calculated by t-test or χ2-test.Never (n=36,660)Ever (n=58,901)P-value3Value is not age adjusted.Age3Value is not age adjusted., mean (SD), year52.8 (6.9)53.5 (6.9)<0.000134.4 (4.7)34.5 (4.6)0.45Body mass index, kgm-2, mean (SD)25.1 (4.6)25.6 (4.8)<0.000123.8 (4.8)24.1 (5.0)<0.0001Current smokers (yes, %)14.516.2<0.000112.614.2<0.0001Alcohol intake, gd-1, mean (SD)6.0 (10.1)6.0 (10.3)0.433.0 (6.1)3.2 (6.1)<0.0001Physical activity, metabolic equivalent hwk-1, mean (SD)14.9 (21.0)16.3 (22.5)<0.000119.4 (25.1)21.6 (27.7)<0.00011 Values are means (SD) or percentages and are standardized to the age distribution of the study population.2 P-values are calculated by t-test or χ2-test.3 Value is not age adjusted. Open table in a new tab Table 2Relative risk of psoriasis by baseline status of working rotating night shifts: Nurses' Health Study (1988–2008) and Nurses' Health Study II (1989–2005)CasesPerson-yearsAge-adjusted HR (95% CI)Multivariate-adjusted HR1Adjusted for age (in continuous variable), body mass index (<21, 21–22.9, 23–24.9, 25–26.9, 27.0–29.9, 30.0–32.9, 33–34.9, ≥35kgm−2), smoking (never, past, current with 1–14, 15–24, ≥25 cigarettes per day), alcohol intake (no, <4.9, 5.0–9.9, or ≥10.0gd−1), and physical activity (<3, 3.0–8.9, 9.0–17.9, 18.0–26.9, or ≥27.0 metabolic equivalent hwk−1). The covariates were time varying and updated in the analysis.(95% CI)Nurses' Health Study7431,237,934 Never258510,6811.001.00 Ever485727,2531.32 (1.13–1.53)1.26 (1.09–1.47) 1–2 Years193307,1261.24 (1.03–1.50)1.24 (1.03–1.49) 3–9 Years195285,5601.35 (1.12–1.62)1.28 (1.07–1.55) =10 Years97134,5671.41 (1.12–1.79)1.29 (1.02–1.64) P-value for trend0.00090.01Nurses' Health Study II1,1441,483,567 Never397569,8141.001.00 Ever747913,7531.17 (1.04–1.32)1.14 (1.01–1.28) 1–2 Years357432,8091.18 (1.02–1.36)1.18 (1.02–1.36) 3–9 Years328414,4351.14 (0.98–1.32)1.09 (0.94–1.26) =10 Years6266,5091.30 (0.99–1.70)1.14 (0.87–1.50) P-value for trend0.0670.42Nurses' Health Study/Nurses' Health Study II Never6551,080,4951.001.00 Ever1,2321,641,0061.23 (1.10–1.38)1.19 (1.07–1.32) 1–2 Years550739,9351.20 (1.07–1.35)1.20 (1.07–1.34) 3–9 Years523699,9951.23 (1.04–1.45)1.17 (1.00–1.38) =10 Years159201,0761.29 (1.08–1.53)1.23 (1.03–1.47) P-value for trend0.0010.049Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.1 Adjusted for age (in continuous variable), body mass index (<21, 21–22.9, 23–24.9, 25–26.9, 27.0–29.9, 30.0–32.9, 33–34.9, ≥35kgm−2), smoking (never, past, current with 1–14, 15–24, ≥25 cigarettes per day), alcohol intake (no, <4.9, 5.0–9.9, or ≥10.0gd−1), and physical activity (<3, 3.0–8.9, 9.0–17.9, 18.0–26.9, or ≥27.0 metabolic equivalent hwk−1). The covariates were time varying and updated in the analysis. Open table in a new tab Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. Night-shift work has been associated with an increased risk of psoriasis comorbidities, with the major underlying mechanism postulated to be exposure to light during the night, leading to disrupted circadian rhythm and decreased melatonin synthesis (Scheer et al., 2009Scheer F.A. Hilton M.F. Mantzoros C.S. et al.Adverse metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of circadian misalignment.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 4453-4458Crossref PubMed Scopus (1497) Google Scholar). Melatonin also has potent antioxidant properties (Bonnefont-Rousselot and Collin, 2010Bonnefont-Rousselot D. Collin F. Melatonin: action as antioxidant and potential applications in human disease and aging.Toxicology. 2010; 278: 55-67Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar; Ochoa et al., 2011Ochoa J.J. Diaz-Castro J. Kajarabille N. et al.Melatonin supplementation ameliorates oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling induced by strenuous exercise in adult human males.J Pineal Res. 2011; 51: 373-380Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar). Night-shift workers may therefore have increased risk for psoriasis because of the diminished ability of the pineal gland to produce melatonin. Another potential explanation may point to vitamin D deficiencies in night workers, with a prior study demonstrating significantly lower vitamin D levels associated with night work (Ward et al., 2011Ward M. Berry D.J. Power C. et al.Working patterns and vitamin D status in mid-life: a cross-sectional study of the 1958 British birth cohort.Occup Environ Med. 2011; 68: 902-907Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar), whereas vitamin D derivatives are part of standard treatment in psoriasis as well as psoriatic arthritis (Bailey et al., 2012Bailey E.E. Ference E.H. Alikhan A. et al.Combination treatments for psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148: 511-522Crossref PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar). Because we were unable to control for exposure to sunlight or vitamin D levels, confounding by vitamin D cannot be ruled out. An increased risk of psoriasis associated with working in shifts may also be partly due to other behavioral risk factors. Those working with a rotating night shift schedule tended to have a higher BMI and were more likely to smoke. Results remained significant, however, after adjusting for these two major psoriasis risk factors (Setty et al., 2007Setty A.R. Curhan G. Choi H.K. Obesity, waist circumference, weight change, and the risk of psoriasis in women: Nurses' Health Study II.Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 1670-1675Crossref PubMed Scopus (380) Google Scholar; Li et al., 2012aLi W. Han J. Choi H.K. et al.Smoking and risk of incident psoriasis among women and men in the United States: a combined analysis.Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 175: 402-413Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). Given the strong associations among obesity, weight gain, and psoriasis (Setty et al., 2007Setty A.R. Curhan G. Choi H.K. Obesity, waist circumference, weight change, and the risk of psoriasis in women: Nurses' Health Study II.Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 1670-1675Crossref PubMed Scopus (380) Google Scholar), a healthy diet could have beneficial effects on psoriasis. The temporal distribution of eating may be affected by shift work (Lowden et al., 2010Lowden A. Moreno C. Holmback U. et al.Eating and shift work—effects on habits, metabolism and performance.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010; 36: 150-162Crossref PubMed Scopus (309) Google Scholar), but one recent study did not support differences in total energy intake and dietary score between daytime and shift workers (Pan et al., 2011Pan A. Schernhammer E.S. Sun Q. et al.Rotating night shift work and risk of type 2 diabetes: two prospective cohort studies in women.PLoS Med. 2011; 8: e1001141Crossref PubMed Scopus (541) Google Scholar). We did not observe marked changes in the effect estimation after additional adjustments to the sensitivity analysis. Nevertheless, an observational study cannot rule out the role of other unfavorable changes in health behaviors among rotating night-shift workers in explaining the observed association. Approximately 8.6 million Americans work in shifts. Our prospective analysis identified an association between rotating night-shift work and an increased risk of psoriasis, indicating a long-term effect of working night shifts, which may help increase the awareness of psoriasis risk among people who work in rotating shifts. Our participants are overwhelmingly white female nurses; therefore, any extrapolation to other populations should be made with caution. The work is supported by the Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, a Nurses' Health Study grant (P01 CA87969), and a Nurses' Health Study II grant (R01 CA50385).

Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Risk of Incident Rosacea among US White Women.

193 Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Risk of Rosacea in US Women

Obesity and Risk for Incident Rosacea in US Women

Shingles and Pneumonia and Risk of Cutaneous Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Incident Rosacea in Women

Rotating Night-Shift Work and Risk of Psoriasis in US Women

Alcohol Intake and Risk of Rosacea in US Women

Association of Caffeine Intake and Caffeinated Coffee Consumption with Risk of Incident Rosacea in Women

Personal history of rosacea and risk of incident cancer among women in the US

Lifetime Cumulative Effect of Reproductive Factors on Ischaemic Heart Disease in a Prospective Cohort.

Reproductive factors, hormone use, and incidence of melanoma in a cohort of US Radiologic Technologists

Rosacea, Use of Tetracycline, and Risk of Incident Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Women

Hormonal and reproductive factors in relation to the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women: a prospective cohort study with 223 526 participants

Vitamin D Status, Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms, and the Risk of Incident rosacea: Evidence from mendelian randomization and Prospective Study of the UK Biobank

Vitamin D Status, Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms, and the Risk of Incident Rosacea: Insights from Mendelian Randomization and Cohort Study in the UK Biobank

Breast Cancer Risk after Recent Childbirth

Hormonal Factors and Risk of Psoriasis in Women: A Cohort Study.

Female reproductive histories and the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Association between Air Quality Index and the risk of rosacea: A Nationwide population-based Cohort Study

Psoriasis and Risk of Nonfatal Cardiovascular Disease in Us Women: A Cohort Study

P109 Association between air quality index and the risk of rosacea: a nationwide population-based cohort study