Combined Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Level Can Predict Survival Outcome in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer

Mengdi Chen,Jiayi Wu,Deyue Liu,Weilin Chen,Caijin Lin,Lisa Andriani,Shuning Ding,Ou Huang,Jianrong He,Xiaosong Chen,Weiguo Chen,Yafen Li,Kunwei Shen,Li Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2021.05.012
IF: 3.078
2022-01-01
Clinical Breast Cancer
Abstract:Breast cancer patients with HR+/HER2+ tumors have a different clinical behavior pattern compared with HR-/HER2+ patients, but PR has been rarely discussed in HER2+ patients. We found out that higher ER and PR level was a favorable predictor of survival outcome in HER2+ patients. Our study calls for more attention to PR expression in HER2+ breast cancer. Background: In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, emerging evidence imply that clinical behaviors differ according to hormone receptor (HR) status. However, there is no conclusion about the relevance between estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) expression and clinical outcome of HER2+ breast cancer. Our study aimed to determine the influence of different ER/PR levels on survival outcome of HER2+ early breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Nine hundred and nineteen early HER2+ breast cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and HR+/HER2+ patients were further divided based on ER level (Low/L: 1%-9%; Median/M: 10%-79%; High/H: 80%-100%) and PR level (Low/L: 0%-19%; High/H: 20%-100%) according to restricted cubic spline (RCS) smoothing cur ve. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Results: Four hundred and forty t wo HR+/HER2+ and 477 HR-/HER2+ breast cancer patients were included in our study and 73.2% received target therapy (HR+ 69.7%, HR76.5%). While HR+/HER2+ breast cancer showed better survival than HR-/HER2+ subtype in 5-year disease free survival (DFS, 93.0% vs. 86.8%, P < .001), no significant difference was observed between DFS in ER+/PR+ and ER +/PR- subgroup (94.4% vs. 90.4%, P = .22). However, a potential correlation was found between ER/PR levels and DFS in HR+ /HER2+ (P = .074) tumors. In HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, all subgroups showed DFS improvement trend versus M-ER/L-PR. In all HER2+ patients, hazard ratio of H-ER/H-PR compared with HR- subtype was 0.10 (95%CI 0.01-0.74, P =.024) in all patients and 0.14 (95%CI, 0.02-1.02, P = .053) in patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy. Conclusion: ER/PR expression may become a predictor of survival benefit in HER2+ early breast cancer and a higher ER/PR level might be associated with better DFS. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?