Assessment of Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Effective Antimicrobial Regimens for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i>

Liang Chen,Xiudi Han,YanLi Li,Minghui Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00698-21
IF: 5.938
2021-01-01
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Abstract:Bloodstream infections (BSIs) attributable to carbapenem-resistant Entero-bacterales (CRE-BSIs) are dangerous and a major cause of mortality in clinical settings. This study was therefore designed to define risk factors linked to 30-day mortality in CRE-BSI patients and to examine the relative efficacies of different antimicrobial treatment regimens in affected individuals. Data pertaining to 187 CRE-BSI cases from four teaching hospitals in China collected between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. For the 187 patients analyzed in this study, the 30-day mortality of CRE-BSI was 41.7% (78/187). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that Pitt bacteremia score, immunocompromised status, meropenem MIC of >= 8 mg/liter, absence of source control of infection, and appropriate empirical therapy were independent predictors of CRE-BSI patient 30-day mortality. After controlling for potential confounding factors relative to ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) treatment, combination therapies including CAZ-AVI (odds ratio (OK 1287; 95% confidence interval [CI), 0.124 to 13.403; P=0.833) were not related to any significant change in patient mortality risk, whereas the 30-day mortality risk was higher for patients administered other antimicrobial regimens (OR, 12.407; 95% CI, 1.684 to 31.430; P=0.011). When patients were treated with antimicrobial regimens not containing CAZ-AVI, combination therapy (OR, 0239; 95% CI, 0.077 to 0.741; P= 0.013) was related to a decreased 30-day mortality risk relative to monotherapy treatment. The mortality-related risk factors and relative antimicrobial regimen efficacy data demonstrated in this study may guide the management of CRE-BSI patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?