Macroeconomic Policies and Systemic Risk in China's Stock Market: An Approach Based on Integrated Hybrid Betas
Kebin DENG,Zihuan GUAN,Bin CHEN
2018-01-01
Abstract:This paper proposes a novel hybrid β, integrating macroeconomic policy factors and firm characteristic factors to detect systemic risk at the firm level in emerging economies such as China. A characteristic of China's economy is the striking contrast between the outstanding macroeconomic growth and the flat performance of listed firms. This hints at the distinction between the impacts of macroeconomic policy and of stock market factors on systemic risk. Using a unique monthly dataset of China's A-share listed firms from January 2000 to December 2015, we provide a new methodology by developing the Bayes estimating approach of Cosemans et al. (2016). We include two indicators, the M2 growth rate to capture monetary policy and the growth rate of state-owned fixed assets to capture fiscal policy, in a dynamic model for estimating the hybrid β (the systemic risk factor). The results demonstrate that both easy monetary policy and easy fiscal policy can significantly decrease systemic risk. In our model, the intercept term α is near zero and the coefficient of the hybrid β is significantly positive, consistent with the classical asset pricing theory. Not including macroeconomic policy factors in a pricing model would lead to both a significantly positive α and a lower coefficient of the hybrid β. We document that systemic risk is well explained by excessive returns after eliminating the measurement error of β in China.We further illustrate how to detect structural turning points in the time-varying risk price and time-varying β by expanding the method of Chen & Hong (2012) and Chen & Huang (2018). Knowing when turning-points occur can help in timing government interventions to address systemic risk. When either the risk price rises abruptly and systemic risk drops swiftly or the reverse happens, the government should intervene in the stock market. When the risk price rises abruptly together with systemic risk, the government should not intervene because the rise in systemic risk implies that the economic climate is improving.We make three contributions. First, we take both the time-varying risk price and the time-varying β (systematic risk) into account and identify the crucial roles of monetary policy and fiscal policy on systemic risk. Ignoring the impacts of macroeconomic policies on systemic risk would lead one to underestimate systemic risk and result in the ineffectiveness of βin explaining the excessive returns of individual stocks. Second, we propose a unique integrated-hybrid β, which is estimated by integrating macroeconomic policy factors with firms' characteristics factors, and demonstrate its advantages in explanatory power and out-sample tests in comparison with the existing mainstream models (e. g., Fama-Macbeth model, Fama-French three-factor model, Carhart four-factor model, Fama-French five-factor model). Third, we demonstrate a method for detecting structural changes in the time-varying hybrid βs and the time-varying risk prices simultaneously. We find two major structural-change points for time-varying risk prices in February 2012 and September 2014 and two major structuralchange points for time-varying βs in August 2012 and December 2014. A series of robustness tests support our conclusions.Our findings help to explain certain policy effects. First, the abovementioned turning-points are related to economic policy uncertainty and economic strategy adjustments in China. The decline in economic policy uncertainty after the 18 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 2012 led to increases in systemic risk and risk prices in the stock market. China's economic strategy adjustment under new normal relates to the declines in systemic risk and risk prices in the stock market in 2014. Second, we examine the necessity for and effectiveness of intervention in the stock market.Third, we show that both easy fiscal policy and expansionary monetary policy can efficiently depress systemic risk in the stock market, illustrating that the duty for systemic risk control lies not only with the China Securities Regulatory Commission, but also with the Ministry of Finance and the People's Bank of China.