Abstract:The fact that people often have preference rankings for their partners is a distinctive aspect of human behavior. Little is known, however, about how this talent as a powerful force shapes human behavioral traits, including those which should not have been favored by selection, such as cooperation in social dilemma situations. Here we propose a dynamic model in which network-structured individuals can switch their interaction partners within neighborhoods based on their preferences. For the partner switching, we propose two interruption regimes: dictatorial regime and negotiating regime. In the dictatorial regime, focal individuals are able to suspend interactions out of preferences unilaterally. In the negotiating regime, either focal individuals or the associated partners agree to suspend, then these interactions can be successfully suspended. We investigate the evolution of cooperation under both preference-driven partner switching regimes in the context of both the weakened variant of the donation game and the standard one. Specifically, we theoretically approximate the critical conditions for cooperation to be favored by weak selection in the weakened donation game where cooperators bear a unit cost to provide a benefit for each active neighbor and simulate the evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the standard donation game to test the robustness of the analytical results. Under dictatorial regime, selection of cooperation becomes harder when individuals have preferences for either cooperator or defector partners, implying that the expulsion of defectors by cooperators is overwhelmed by the chasing of defectors towards cooperators. Under negotiating regime, both preferences for cooperator and defector partners can significantly favor the evolution of cooperation, yet underlying mechanisms differ greatly. For preferences over cooperator partners, cooperator–cooperator interaction relationships are reinforced and the associated mutual reciprocity can resist and assimilate defectors. For preferences over defector partners, defector–defector interaction relationships are anchored, weakening defectors’ exploitation over cooperators. Cooperators are thus offered much time space to interact among cospecies and spread. Our work may help better understand the critical role of preference-based adaptive partner switching in promoting the evolution of cooperation.

Coevolution of fairness and spite on stochastic dynamics networks

Evolutionary Dynamics of Fairness on Graphs with Migration

Evolution of Cooperation on Stochastic Dynamical Networks

The coevolutionary ultimatum game on different network topologies

Limitation of network inhomogeneity in improving cooperation in coevolutionary dynamics

Social Tolerance Allows Cooperation To Prevail In An Adaptive Environment

Evolutionary dynamics under partner preferences

Coevolution of Strategy and Structure on Social Networks

Evolution of fairness in the divide-a-lottery game

Coevolutionary Dynamics of Opinion Propagation and Social Balance: the Key Role of Small-Worldness

Coexistence of Strong and Weak Social Ties Leads to Fair Allocations of Resources in Finite Populations

Promotion of cooperation induced by the interplay between structure and game dynamics

Towards the Role of Social Connectivity and Aspiration Level on Evolutionary Game

Data-driven evolutionary game models for the spread of fairness and cooperation in heterogeneous networks

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation: A fairness preference perspective

Stochastic win-stay-lose-shift strategy with dynamic aspirations in evolutionary social dilemmas

Interplay between evolutionary game and network structure: the coevolution of social net, cooperation and wealth

Evolution of Fairness in the Mixture of the Ultimatum Game and the Dictator Game

Coevolution of relationship and interaction in cooperative dynamical multiplex networks

Promoting Cooperation by Local Contribution under Stochastic Win-Stay-Lose-Shift Mechanism