Predictive Models for Flame Evolution Using Machine Learning: A Priori Assessment in Turbulent Flames Without and with Mean Shear

Jiahao Ren,Haiou Wang,Guo Chen,Kun Luo,Jianren Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048680
IF: 4.6
2021-01-01
Physics of Fluids
Abstract:Accurate prediction of temporal evolution of turbulent flames represents one of the most challenging problems in the combustion community. In this work, predictive models for turbulent flame evolution were proposed based on machine learning with long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM). Two configurations without and with mean shear are considered, i.e., turbulent freely propagating premixed combustion and turbulent boundary layer premixed combustion, respectively. The predictions of the LSTM and CNN-LSTM models were validated against the direct numerical simulation (DNS) data to assess the model performance. Particularly, the statistics of the fuel ( C H 4 for the freely propagating flames and H 2 for the boundary layer flames) mass fraction and reaction rate were examined in detail. It was found that generally the performance of the CNN-LSTM model is better than that of the LSTM model. This is because that the CNN-LSTM model extracts both the spatial and temporal features of the flames while the LSTM model only extracts the temporal feature of the flames. The errors of the models mainly occur in regions with large scalar gradients. The correlation coefficient of the mass fraction from the DNS and that from the CNN-LSTM model is larger than 0.99 in various flames. The correlation coefficient of the reaction rate from the DNS and that from the CNN-LSTM model is larger than 0.93 in the freely propagating flames and 0.99 in the boundary layer flames. Finally, the profiles of the DNS values and predictions conditioned on axial distance were examined, and it was shown that the predictions of the CNN-LSTM model agree well with the DNS values. The LSTM model failed to accurately predict the evolution of boundary layer flames while the CNN-LSTM model could accurately predict the evolution of both freely propagating and boundary layer flames. Overall, this study shows the promising performance and the applicability of the proposed CNN-LSTM model, which will be applied to turbulent flames a posteriori in future work.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?