Early mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation can improve outcomes in patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest in the emergency department

Li Luo,XiaoDong Zhang,Tao Xiang,Hang Dai,JiMei Zhang,GuangYing Zhuo,YuFang Sun,XiaoJun Deng,Wei Zhang,Ming Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211025368
2021-01-01
Journal of International Medical Research
Abstract:Objective To compare the outcomes of patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest (CA) who received early versus late mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the Lund University Cardiac Assist System (LUCAS) device in the emergency department (ED). Methods This was a retrospective observational study in the ED of a single medical center performed from May 2018 to December 2019; 68 patients with CA were eligible. We grouped the patients according to the time to initiating LUCAS use after CA into an early group (<= 4 minutes) and late group (>4 minutes). Results The rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was higher in the early group vs the late group (69.2% vs 52.4%, respectively). The 4-hour survival rate was significantly higher in the early group vs the late group (83.3% vs 45.5%, respectively), and CPR duration was significantly shorter in the early group (23.3 +/- 12.5 vs 31.1 +/- 14.8 minutes, respectively). Conclusion Early mechanical CPR can improve the success of achieving ROSC and the 4-hour survival rate in patients with non-traumatic CA in the ED, considering that more benefits were observed in patients who received early vs late LUCAS device therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?