Abstract:Academic abstract: Advantaged group allies have multiple motives for supporting equality, raising questions about their sincerity. We draw upon the covariation model of attributions to explain how disadvantaged group members make attributions about whether advantaged group "allies" are sincerely motivated to empower the disadvantaged group. We propose an Attribution-Identity Model of Sincerity (AIMS) which posits that disadvantaged group members view advantaged group members as sincere allies when they support equality in the presence of inhibitory causes and in the absence of facilitative causes, exceed expectations for the advantaged group, and provide support across time and contexts. Furthermore, those who identify strongly with their disadvantaged group and perceive intergroup inequality as illegitimate are most motivated to ascertain the sincerity of advantaged group members' allyship. AIMS suggests how members of disadvantaged groups seek to maximize benefits and minimize risks of advantaged group members' allyship. Public abstract: Advantaged group members (e.g., men, White Americans) can act as allies for disadvantaged groups (e.g., women, Americans belonging to minoritized racial groups), but members of disadvantaged groups sometimes have reason to question whether their motives are sincere. We argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when they support equality when they do not stand to benefit from it and even when they stand to lose. We also argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when their support for equality goes beyond expectations for their advantaged group, consistently over time, and is not limited to particular situations, forms, or contexts. Members of disadvantaged groups like sincere allies, want to work with them, and feel safe around them. Sincere allies also serve as moral exemplars to other members of advantaged groups.

Seeing you in me: Moderating role of relationship satisfaction and commitment on assumed similarity in honesty-humility and openness to experience

Perceived general similarity and relationship satisfaction: The role of attributional confidence

Couple Similarity on Personality, Moral Identity and Spirituality Predict Life Satisfaction of Spouses and Their Offspring

Honesty-humility negatively correlates with dishonesty in romantic relationships

"My Aim Is True": An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity

Similarity enhances psychological compatibility: Serial mediation effect of psychological kinship and intergroup contact

On the relations between HEXACO agreeableness (versus anger) and honesty-humility

Re‐evaluating the honing framework: Naturalistic observation of same‐ and different‐sex couples' conversations

Effects of Actual (Manipulated) and Perceived Similarity on Liking in Get-acquainted Interactions: The Role of Communication

Acquaintance ratings of honesty-humility and their relationship with extra-role behaviors

Sociability across Eastern-Western cultures: Is it the same underlying construct?

The Actor, Partner, Similarity Effects of Personality, and Interactions with Gender and Relationship Duration among Chinese Emerging Adults

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

Explaining East-West Differences in the Likelihood of Making Favorable Self-Evaluations: the Role of Evaluation Apprehension and Directness of Expression

A Comparison of Measures for Assessing Profile Similarity in Dyads

A Sense of Obligation: Cultural Differences in the Experience of Obligation.

Openness to Experience: Its Lower Level Structure, Measurement, and Cross-Cultural Equivalence

Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions

Differences in Effects of Honesty Measurement Methods: Situational Judgment Test Format vs. Likert-type Rating Scale

The relationship between Honesty-Humility and malevolent creativity: Sequential mediation models with prosocial moral emotional traits and prosocial tendencies

The longitudinal relationships of interpersonal openness trait, hostility, and hostile attribution bias