Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to investigate the motivations behind the publication of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and particularly the effect of information asymmetry between firms and their owners. Design/methodology/approach A natural experiment contrasting the CSR reporting of private vs public firms is used to test whether the degree of information asymmetry is a significant factor in the decision to publish CSR reports. Using a hand-collected sample of the 239 largest US private companies matched with publicly-traded firms, the effect of these inherently different information environments on CSR reporting is tested through logistic regression. Factors suggested by stakeholder and legitimacy theories are tested for their differential impact on private vs public firms’ decisions to publish a CSR report. Findings Results indicate that private firms are less likely to publish a CSR report than similar public firms. Public firms also follow Global Reporting Initiative guidelines more frequently, consistent with signaling report quality to dispersed investors. A subsample of private companies facing greater information asymmetry is found to be similar to public firms in their reporting behavior, reinforcing the link between information asymmetry and CSR disclosure. Further analysis suggests that non-owner stakeholders play an important role in private companies’ CSR reporting decisions. Practical implications In addition to accounting and governance scholars, the findings should interest private firm managers preparing for an initial public offering (IPO), as the evidence suggests that CSR reporting is used to communicate information to dispersed investors. The insight into reporting motivations should be useful to accountants engaged in CSR consultation and assurance. Social implications With the growing attention paid to the CSR performance of firms, demonstrated by the growth in socially responsible investing, the study provides evidence that effective communication of CSR information to investors may play a key role in CSR-engaged firms’ disclosure strategies. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to analyze the CSR reporting decisions of a large sample of publicly-traded and privately-held firms. The results add to our understanding of what motivates firms to publish CSR reports, highlighting the importance of information asymmetry between the firm and its owners.

From modesty to market: shareholder reactions to humility rhetoric in family and nonfamily firms under media scrutiny

Cognitive Antecedents of Family Business Bias in Investment Decisions: A Commentary on “risky Decisions and the Family Firm Bias: an Experimental Study Based on Prospect Theory”

Private Listed Companies in China:Family Governance and Firm Value

Does Family Involvement Make Firms Donate More? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

When Does Family Ownership Promote Proactive Environmental Strategy? the Role of the Firm’s Long-Term Orientation

Fitting the name or unworthy of the name?-Does the name of family firm major shareholder influence family's egoistic behavior?

CEO Humility and Corporate Social Irresponsibility: Evidence Based on a New Unobtrusive Measure

The Shared Cost of Pursuing Shareholder Value

Pride or empathy? Exploring effective CSR communication strategies on social media

Virtuous Leader, Virtuous Firm: How Humble CEOs Build Good Firms by Fostering Virtuousness

A Straw in the Wind: Media Opinion on the Family and Analyst Responses During Family Firm Succession

The pitfalls of corporate social irresponsibility: Hypocrisy of family firms in South Korea

The Bind that Ties: Socioemotional Wealth Preservation in Family Firms

Corporate social responsibility, family involvement, and stock price crash risk

Leader Humility and Inter-Firm Collaboration: the Moderating Role of Firm Status and Environmental Uncertainty

Information asymmetry in CSR reporting: publicly-traded versus privately-held firms

Humble Chief Executive Officers' Connections to Top Management Team Integration and Middle Managers' Responses

Media Coverage and Firm Valuation: Evidence from China

Family Firm Governance and Financial Policy Choices in Newly Public Firms

Does soft shareholder activism hold hard consequences?

Encouraging Non-Family Employee Voice in Family Firm: the Role Model Effect of Owning Family