Abstract:In the last decade, political debates have progressively shifted to social media. Rhetorical devices employed by online actors and factions that operate in these debating arenas can be captured and analysed to conduct a statistical reading of societal controversies and their argumentation dynamics. In this paper, we propose a five-step methodology, to extract, categorize and explore the latent argumentation structures of online debates. Using Twitter data about a "no-deal" Brexit, we focus on the expected effects in case of materialisation of this event. First, we extract cause-effect claims contained in tweets using RegEx that exploit verbs related to Creation, Destruction and Causation. Second, we categorise extracted "no-deal" effects using a Structural Topic Model estimated on unigrams and bigrams. Third, we select controversial effect topics and explore within-topic argumentation differences between self-declared partisan user factions. We hence type topics using estimated covariate effects on topic propensities, then, using the topics correlation network, we study the topological structure of the debate to identify coherent topical constellations. Finally, we analyse the debate time dynamics and infer lead/follow relations among factions. Results show that the proposed methodology can be employed to perform a statistical rhetorics analysis of debates, and map the architecture of controversies across time. In particular, the "no-deal" Brexit debate is shown to have an assortative argumentation structure heavily characterized by factional constellations of arguments, as well as by polarized narrative frames invoked through verbs related to Creation and Destruction. Our findings highlight the benefits of implementing a systemic approach to the analysis of debates, which allows the unveiling of topical and factional dependencies between arguments employed in online debates.

Linking the Dynamics of User Stance to the Structure of Online Discussions

Opinion Polarization by Learning from Social Feedback

Stance Influences Your Thoughts: Psychology-Inspired Social Media Analytics

(Mis)alignment Between Stance Expressed in Social Media Data and Public Opinion Surveys

Your Stance is Exposed! Analysing Possible Factors for Stance Detection on Social Media

A multilayered graph-based framework to explore behavioural phenomena in social media conversations

Pro or Anti? A Social Influence Model of Online Stance Flipping

Gaining a better understanding of online polarization by approaching it as a dynamic process

Modeling Political Orientation of Social Media Posts: An Extended Analysis

Unveiling the silent majority: stance detection and characterization of passive users on social media using collaborative filtering and graph convolutional networks

A dynamical model of platform choice and online segregation

Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users

A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives

Improved Stance Prediction in a User Similarity Feature Space

The Unfolding Structure of Arguments in Online Debates: The case of a No-Deal Brexit

Improving Stance Detection by Leveraging Measurement Knowledge from Social Sciences: A Case Study of Dutch Political Tweets and Traditional Gender Role Division

Visual analysis of online social media to open up the investigation of stance phenomena

Stochastic Models Predict User Behavior in Social Media

Characterizing Long-Running Political Phenomena on Social Media

The drivers of online polarization: fitting models to data