[Comparison of the effectiveness of the posterior malleolus fixed or not on treatment of different Haraguchi's classification of posterior malleolus fractures].

Feng Chen,Zhongcheng An,Fang Zhou,Jiajun Fan,Wei Gao,Zhe Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202012114
2021-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effectiveness of fixation the posterior malleolus or not to treat different Haraguchi's classification of posterior malleolus fractures. METHODS:The clinical data of 86 trimalleolar fracture patients who were admitted between January 2015 and September 2019 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively reviewed. There were 29 males and 57 females; the age ranged from 26 to 82 years with a mean age of 55.2 years. According to Haraguchi's classification, 38 patients were in type Ⅰ group, 30 patients in type Ⅱ group, and 18 patients in type Ⅲ group. There was no significant difference in the general data such as gender, age, and fracture location among the 3 groups ( PRESULTS:The procedure was successfully completed by all patients in each group, and there was no significant difference in operation time ( FPχ2PPPPPCONCLUSION:Haraguchi type Ⅱ posterior malleolus fractures have a worse prognosis than types Ⅰ and Ⅲ fractures, especially in terms of postoperative pain, which can be significantly improved by fixing the posterior malleolus; the presence or absence of posterior malleolus fixation in types Ⅰ and Ⅲ has less influence on prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?