Subtraction Improves the Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography for Detecting Obstructive Disease in Severely Calcified Segments

Xu Lixue,Li Fang,Wu Kewei,Zhong Zhaohui,Huang Rongchong,Xu Yinghao,Wang Zhenchang,Yang Zhenghan,He Yi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08092-5

IF: 7.034

2021-01-01

European Radiology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and interobserver agreement of subtraction coronary CT angiography (CCTA) versus invasive coronary angiography on 320-row CT in coronary segments with severe or non-severe calcification.MATERIALS/METHODS:Sixty-four patients (33 men, 66.6 ± 8.2 years) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled from October 2019 to June 2020. The cross-sectional circumferential extent of calcification was used to classify calcified segments as non-severely ( < 180°) or severely calcified ( ≥ 180°). Three independent, blinded radiologists evaluated the severity of coronary stenosis. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Fleiss' kappa (κ). A multiple-reader multiple-case receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was conducted, and diagnostic accuracy was measured using the mean areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), with ≥ 50% stenosis as a cut-off. Diagnostic confidence, diagnostic accuracy, and interobserver agreement were compared between CCTA with or without subtraction information in severely and non-severely calcified segments.RESULTS:In cases with severe calcification (51 patients, 146 segments), CCTA with subtraction information achieved better diagnostic accuracy (per-patient AUC: 0.73 vs 0.57, p = 0.03; per-segment AUC: 0.85 vs 0.62, p = 0.01), diagnostic confidence (3.7 vs 2.6, p < 0.001), and interobserver agreement (κ: 0.59 vs 0.30). Diagnostic accuracy (per-patient AUC: 0.81 vs 0.93, p = 0.30; per-patient AUC: 0.79 vs 0.82, p = 0.54) was not increased in cases with non-severe calcification (13 patients, 190 segments).CONCLUSIONS:CCTA with subtraction information achieved better diagnostic accuracy in cases of severe calcification (circumferential extent ≥ 180°). However, for non-severe calcification (circumferential extent < 180°), the effect of calcium subtraction was unclear, as it did not improve diagnostic accuracy.KEY POINTS:• Subtraction coronary CT angiography achieves better diagnostic accuracy, higher diagnostic confidence, and increased interobserver agreement for severe calcification (circumferential extent ≥ 180°). • Calcium subtraction does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography for calcification with a circumferential extent of < 180°.