The Associations of Birth Outcome Differences in Twins with Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol A and Its Alternatives.

Jie Wang,Hong Mei,Ai-Fen Zhou,Li-Li Huang,Zhong-Qiang Cao,Ao-Bo Hong,Meng Yang,Qi-Tong Xie,Da Chen,Shao-Ping Yang,Han Xiao,Pan Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111459
IF: 8.3
2021-01-01
Environmental Research
Abstract:Background: Bisphenol A (BPA) and its alternatives, including BPF and BPS, exhibit endocrine disruption activities. However, the effects of bisphenols on fetal growth in twins remain unclear. Objective: To explore the associations of prenatal BPA, BPF, and BPS exposure with birth outcome differences in twins. Methods: We recruited 289 twin pregnant women who visited the hospital for prenatal examination during the first trimester from 2013 to 2016. Urinary bisphenol levels were determined during the first, second, and third trimesters. The associations of maternal exposure to bisphenols with birth outcome differences in twins were analyzed after stratification by different trimesters. We applied the multiple informant model to estimate trimester-specific associations between urinary bisphenol concentrations and birth outcome differences in twins. Results: We found low reproducibility (ICC<0.40) for maternal urinary BPA and moderate reproducibility (0.40 < ICC<0.75) for BPF and BPS. Urinary BPA concentrations were positively associated with within-pair twin birth weight difference when comparing the third vs. the first tertile in each of the three trimesters (i.e., 133.06 g, 95% CI: 68.19, 197.94; 144.5 g, 95%CI: 81.82-207.18 g; and 135.04 g, 95%CI: 71.37-198.71 g for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimester, respectively). The effect of urinary BPA concentration on increased birth length difference withinpair twins were also observed across different trimesters (All P for trends < 0.05). Urinary BPA levels were positively associated with the within-pair birth weight and birth length differences across pregnancy trimesters (All of Type 3 P for values < 0.05). Conclusion: Maternal BPA exposure appeared to influence birth wight and birth length differences in twins. Our results warrant further confirmation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?