Temporary Internal Iliac Artery Blockage versus Uterine Artery Embolization in Patients After Laparoscopic Pregnancy Tissue Removal Due to Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
Qian Zhao,Xue-Yu Sun,Shu-Qi Ma,Meng-Wei Miao,Gai-Ling Li,Jing-Lu Wang,Rui-Xia Guo,Liu-Xia Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S340066
IF: 2.145
2022-01-11
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Qian Zhao, &ast Xue-Yu Sun, &ast Shu-Qi Ma, Meng-Wei Miao, Gai-Ling Li, Jing-Lu Wang, Rui-Xia Guo, Liu-Xia Li Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Rui-Xia Guo Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 of Jianshe Dong Street, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China Tel +86 13525569376 Email Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of laparoscopic temporary internal iliac artery blockage (TIIAB) compared with uterine artery embolization (UAE) in type III cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods: A total of 76 patients with type III CSP admitted to the Department of Gynecology the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between September 2017 and June 2019 were selected for this retrospective study. Thirty-six of them in the study group received TIIAB, and the rest in control group received UAE. Laparoscopic pregnancy tissue was removed from all patients, and the uterine defects were repaired. The absence of remnants was then confirmed using ultrasonography. Follow-ups were performed in the two groups for six months, and the factors of intraoperative blood loss, operation and menelipsis time, 24-h human chorionic gonadotropin decline rate, postoperative complications, hospitalization days, hospitalization costs, peri-operative hormone levels, and ovarian function indicators were compared between the two groups and within each group. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the hospitalization cost, menelipsis time, and postoperative complication incidence between the two groups (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between ovarian function at one month and three months after surgery (p < 0.05) as well as among the follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estradiol levels at one, three, and six months after surgery in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with uterine artery embolization, laparoscopic TIIAB has the advantages of a low hospitalization cost, lower postoperative complication rate, and shorter menelipsis time. Moreover, it avoids ovarian function damage. It is a safe method worthy of clinical popularization. Keywords: type III cesarean scar pregnancy, laparoscopic internal iliac artery, occlusion, uterine artery embolization, ovarian function Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) refers to a special type of ectopic pregnancy featuring gestational sacs, fertilized eggs, or embryos implanted on the lower uterine segment cesarean incision scar in a pregnant woman with a history of cesarean section. It is a long-term cesarean section complication. 1 CSP has attracted great attention in clinical practice due to its severe complications, such as massive bleeding, uterine rupture, peripheral organ damage, and even hysterectomy, which is difficult to control and is a serious threat to women's reproductive health and even their lives. 2 The CSP concept was first reported by Larsen et al 3 in 1978; however, only 19 additional cases were reported between 1978 and 2001. Nevertheless, a large number of case reports and meta-analyses have been conducted on CSP treatment and management practices since 2001. 4 CSP incidence is low in China, with approximately 1 per 1800–2216 pregnant women, which accounts for 0.15% of all pregnancies. 5 Although an increased recurrent CSP morbidity can be expected to increase after the first cesarean section occurrence, greater awareness and enhancement of CSP clinical diagnostic techniques among obstetricians and gynecologists can also contribute to the rate increase. 4–8 Although the CSP pathogenesis is presently unclear, the most prominent theory on the matter is that the pathogenesis is closely related to a muscular layer defect caused by post-traumatic wound healing damage leading to localized depression. 9 There is still a lack of unified CSP treatment guidelines. Individual treatment plans should be made based on the comprehensive consideration of the patient's blood β-HCG level, scar site muscular thickness, mass size, blood flow, clinical symptoms, and own wishes. Currently, commonly used treatment methods include drug therapy, surgical treatment, or a combination of the two. Fylstra 10 reports that CSP resection + uterine repair may be the best CSP treatment method. The Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine also suggests that surgical resection (transvaginal or laparoscopic surgery if possible) should be considered for patients with CSP. 1 -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal