Critical Evaluation of Current Techniques for Modelling Heat-Related Mortality Adaptation under Climate Change

Simon Gosling,David Hondula,Aditi Bunker,Xinxin Zhang,Junguo Liu,Rainer Sauerborn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2016.3344
2016-01-01
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: This is the first quantitative and comparative evaluation of techniques for modelling adaptation in climate change impact assessments of heat-related mortality. METHODS: Impacts are estimated for 14 European cities at the end of the century using exposure-response functions (ERFs) with and without adaptation respectively. Four techniques for modelling adaptation that have been regularly used in past assessments are compared. RESULTS: Impacts could be over 40% lower with adaptation in some cities. Increasing the threshold temperature and applying the analogue city approach reduces most the impact of climate change. However, using a different technique, up to a 90% decline in the sensitivity of the ERF would be needed to replicate these beneficial effects. The spread in impact from applying different adaptation modelling techniques is often smaller than the spread in impact that arises from using climate projections from different climate models and emissions scenarios. CONCLUSION: Studies that provide empirical and quantifiable evidence for historical adaptation are needed to inform techniques for modelling adaptation, since two techniques assessed here (threshold increase and analogue city), which are widely employed in impact studies arbitrarily and without supporting empirical evidence, are likely to be overly optimistic. Nevertheless current impact estimates are dominated by climate model and emissions uncertainties.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?