Abstract:Research data sets are growing to unprecedented sizes and network modeling is commonly used to extract complex relationships in diverse domains, such as genetic interactions involved in disease, logistics, and social communities. As the number of nodes increases in a network, an increasing sparsity of edges is a practical limitation due to memory restrictions. Moreover, many of these sparse networks exhibit very large numbers of nodes with no adjacent edges, as well as disjoint components of nodes with no edges connecting them. A prevalent aim in network modeling is the identification of clusters, or communities, of nodes that are highly interrelated. Several definitions of strong community structure have been introduced to facilitate this task, each with inherent assumptions and biases. We introduce an intuitive objective function for quantifying the quality of clustering results in large sparse networks. We utilize a two-step method for identifying communities which is especially well-suited for this domain as the first step efficiently divides the network into the disjoint components, while the second step optimizes clustering of the produced components based on the new objective. Using simulated networks, optimization based on the new objective function consistently yields significantly higher accuracy than those based on the modularity function, with the widest gaps appearing for the noisiest networks. Additionally, applications to benchmark problems illustrate the intuitive correctness of our approach. Finally, the practicality of our approach is demonstrated in real-world data in which we identify complex genetic interactions in large-scale networks comprised of tens of thousands of nodes. Based on these three different types of trials, our results clearly demonstrate the usefulness of our two-step procedure and the accuracy of our simple objective.

Quantifying Intragroup and Intergroup Connections in Non-disjoint Groups in Social Networks: A Comprehensive Analysis Incorporating Edges' and Nodes' Weights

Comprehensive Influence of Topological Location and Neighbor Information on Identifying Influential Nodes in Complex Networks.

Bridgeness: A Local Index on Edge Significance in Maintaining Global Connectivity

The relevance of higher-order ties

Characterizing Nodes and Edges in Dynamic Attributed Networks: A Social-based Approach

A New Methodology for Generalizing Unweighted Network Measures

Modeling influence diffusion to uncover influence centrality and community structure in social networks

Investigating Centrality Measures in Social Networks with Community Structure

Interplay between Social Influence and Network Centrality: A Comparative Study on Shapley Centrality and Single-Node-Influence Centrality

Node-weighted interacting network measures improve the representation of real-world complex systems

An Enhanced Gravity Model for Determining Crucial Nodes in Social Networks Based on Degree K-Shell Eigenvector Index

Nodal statistics-based equivalence relation for graph collections

Centrality measures in interval-weighted networks

Ranking the Importance of Nodes of Complex Networks by the Equivalence Classes Approach

Sifting out communities in large sparse networks

Assessing Network Representations for Identifying Interdisciplinarity

Combined Centrality Measures for an Improved Characterization of Influence Spread in Social Networks

Identifying influential nodes in complex networks: Effective distance gravity model

Characterizing the Interactions Between Classical and Community-aware Centrality Measures in Complex Networks

Generalizations of Edge Overlap to Weighted and Directed Networks

A Methodology for the Analysis of Collaboration Networks with Higher-Order Interactions