Quantile-based heterogeneous effects of nuclear energy and political stability on the environment in highly nuclear energy-consuming and politically stable countries

Mustafa Tevfik Kartal,Serpil Kılıç Depren,Fatih Ayhan,Talat Ulussever

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123237

IF: 11.2

2024-04-19

Applied Energy

Abstract:The study analyzes the effects of nuclear energy and political stability (PS) on environmental degradation. For this aim, the study uses carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions as the environmental degradation indicator, considers nuclear energy consumption (NEC) and political risk index (PRI) as explanatory variables, uses data between 1991/Q1 and 2021/Q4, and investigates eight highly politically stable countries in this way. Also, the study performs novel quantile-on-quantile regression and Granger causality-in-quantiles models as the fundamental models and applies the quantile regression model for robustness. The results reveal that (i) NEC has a mainly curbing effect on CO 2 emissions at higher levels of NEC and is beneficial for Finland, Switzerland, Canada, Netherlands, and United Kingdom; (ii) PS has a generally decreasing effect on CO 2 emissions at higher levels of PS and is effective in Finland, Canada, and Germany; (iii) NEC and PS have a causal mainly effects on CO 2 emissions in the countries; (iv) the robustness of the results is verified through alternative approach. Overall, there are dependencies from NEC and PS to CO 2 emissions and the effects of both NEC and PS on CO 2 emissions vary across countries and quantiles. Hence, the results highlight the heterogeneous effects of NEC and PS on CO 2 emissions and underline the significance of quantile and country-based analyses for better empirical examination. Various policy caveats are discussed based on the fact that Finland and Canada can benefit from both NEC and PS in decreasing CO 2 emissions, whereas Sweden and the USA cannot, and the remaining countries have mixed results.

energy & fuels,engineering, chemical