Abstract:Consumers in real world sometimes face situations in which information about unavailable products is still present in the decision contexts. For example, consumers may find that certain options are sold out and thus marked by an out-of-stock stamp in such a way that consumers can still examine their attributes information. Traditional models of consumer choices have assumed that the addition of an unavailable alternative to a choice set has no impact on the shares among the original alternatives. However, recent studies on asymmetrical dominance choice sets suggest that adding an alternative that asymmetrically dominates a targeted alternative and is declared to be unavailable increases preference for the target in the original choice set. Three categories of theories, range-weighting, similarity-substitution and relative-advantage, have been used to explain the phenomenon. Despite prior research interest in extending attraction effect in unavailability context, little is understood about how unavailable options influence preferences among available options in other choice settings. Dominant literature have advocate for the preference for the compromised option in a three-option set. Thus, it is typical that the unavailable option is the compromised one. The above three explanations all fail to predict the preference on the remaining options in this situation. We propose that consumers are experiencing increasing decision difficulty or feeling greater conflict deciding in the unavailable compromise set than in the two-option set, and thus are likely to alleviate this negative task-related emotion by engaging in conflict-reducing heuristics. In particular, if choice of the compromise option that is associated with smallest maximum error or likelihood of being criticized is impossible, consumers forced to make difficult trade-offs among extremes are likely to rely more on the unambiguous attribute in the evaluations, because unambiguous outcome is associated with a lower likelihood of criticism. Thus, consumers seek to guarantee (avoid) advantages (disadvantages) of their selected option in precision rather than in ambiguity. Based on findings that attributes in quantitative nature (e.g., price) are easier to trade-off than attributes (e.g., quality) in qualitative nature, we predict that the relative preferences for low-quality, low-price option which has a precise and certain advantage will be stronger in presence than in absence of an unavailable intermediate option. Study 1 establishes that the addition of an unavailable compromise option into a two-option local set can increase the relative share of the cheaper option. In Study 2, we demonstrate that the degree to which the quality advantage (disadvantage) can be ambiguously evaluated moderates this effect. When the value of quality becomes less ambiguous to evaluate (providing experts' quality evaluations, Study 2A) or more ambiguous to evaluate (describing product quality by a range of performance, Study 2B), the effect that the cheaper option fares better in the unavailable middle option set attenuates or strengthens. Study 3 further examines the underlying mechanism by testing the moderating effect of consumer product knowledge, and the mediating effect of decision conflict. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and managerial implications.

A Good Way to Boost Sales? Effects of the Proportion of Sold-out Options on Purchase Behavior

Evaluating the Potential Effects from Probabilistic Selling of Similar Products

Forgo or Go for One? the Unavailable Effect in Non-comparable Choice Sets

The effects of promotions on hedonic versus utilitarian purchases

Quality or price? The effect of stock-out middle option on consumer choices

The Out-of-Stock (OOS) Effect on Choice Shares of Available Options

Effects of Price Discounts and Bonus Packs on Online Impulse Buying

Asserting Your Mind: Interruptions Extremize Consumer Choices

Targeted Promotions on an E-Book Platform: Crowding Out, Heterogeneity, and Opportunity Costs

Prbm_a_238581 29..39

The effects of out-of-stock, return, and cancellation amounts on the order amounts of an online retailer

How psychological ownership over nutritional products affects purchase intentions of high-pressure working groups

Weighting of Small Probabilities and Its Market Applications

Can the Love for Promotional Offering Be Easily Substituted? Impact of Promotional Out-of-Stock of New Products on Consumer's Response to Recommendation of Similar Alternatives

The Effect of Probabilistic Selling on the Optimal Product Mix

Too Little or Too Much Seller Assortment: The Effects on Buyers’ Purchase Probabilities in a Food Sharing Platform

To What Extent Does Blind Box Marketing Affect Peoples Consuming Behavior?

Effect of Space Order on Impulse Buying: Moderated by Self-Construal

The Effect of Promotion Types on Consumers' Purchase Decisions: from the Perspective of Construal Level Theory

Effect of discount frame on consumer responses: moderation of psychological distance and product nature