Abstract:Novel pollen co‐transport networks reveal that plants (e.g., Delphinium uliginosum—DEUL shown at the centre of the figure) face different pollen‐pollen competitive landscapes [indicated, for example, by the variation in modularity (Q)] as they travel on the bodies of different pollinators with unexplored ecological and evolutionary consequences. Different node colour within networks indicates different modules of potential pollen‐pollen interactions. The patterns and drivers of pollen transport on insect bodies can have important consequences for plant reproductive success and floral evolution; however, they remain little studied. Recently, pollinator bodies have been further described as pollen competitive arenas, where pollen grains can compete for space, with implications for the evolution of pollen dispersal strategies and plant community assembly. However, the identity, strength, and diversity of pollen competitive interactions and how they vary across pollinator functional groups is not known. Evaluating patterns and drivers of the pollen co‐transport landscape and how these vary across different pollinator groups is central to further our understanding of floral evolution and co‐flowering community assembly. Here, we integrate information on the number and identity of pollen grains on individual insect pollen loads with network analyses to uncover novel pollen co‐transport networks and how these vary across pollinator functional groups (bees and bee flies). We further evaluate differences in pollen load size, species composition, diversity and phylogenetic diversity among insect groups and how these relate to body size and gender. Pollen co‐transport networks were diverse and highly modular in bees, with groups of pollen species interacting more often with each other on insect bodies. However, the number, identity and frequency of competitors that pollen grains encounter on insect bodies vary between some pollinator functional groups. Other aspects of pollen loads such as their size, richness and phylogenetical diversity were shaped by bee size or gender, with females carrying larger but less phylogenetically diverse pollen loads than males. Synthesis. Our results show that the number, identity and phylogenetic relatedness of pollen competitors changes as pollen grains travel on the body of different pollinators. As a result, pollinator groups impose vastly different interaction landscapes during pollen transport, with so far unknown consequences for plant reproductive success, floral evolution and community assembly.

Geographic Variation in the Robustness of Pollination Networks is Mediated by Modularity

Historical climate-change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks

Stable species and interactions in plant-pollinator networks deviate from core position in fragmented habitats

Urbanisation and agricultural intensification modulate plant–pollinator network structure and robustness

Structure and robustness of"pollinators-plants-herbivores"network in the alpine meadow of the Northwestern Sichuan Province

Pollinator richness, pollination networks, and diet adjustment along local and landscape gradients of resource diversity

Keep the bees off the trees: The particular vulnerability of species in the periphery of mutualistic networks to shock perturbations

Interaction network structure explains species' temporal persistence in empirical plant–pollinator communities

Patterns and drivers of pollen co‐transport network structure vary across pollinator functional groups

Plant survival and keystone pollinator species in stochastic coextinction models: role of intrinsic dependence on animal-pollination

Seasonal dynamic variation of pollination network is associated with the number of species in flower in an oceanic island community

Local and regional processes drive distance decay in structure in a spatial multilayer plant-pollinator network

The Topological Differences Between Visitation and Pollen Transport Networks: a Comparison in Species Rich Communities of the Himalaya–Hengduan Mountains

Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity

Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape

Glacier retreat decreases plant-pollinator network robustness over space-time

The role of asymmetric interactions on the effect of habitat destruction in mutualistic networks

Emergence of structure in plant–pollinator networks: low floral resource constrains network specialisation

A phylogenetic perspective on ecological specialisation reveals hummingbird and insect pollinators have generalist diets

Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes

Effect of network structure and adaptive foraging on pollination services of species-rich plant-pollinator communities