Abstract:Purpose This study aims to investigate how the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Chinese outward foreign direct investments (FDI) impact the Belt and Road countries (BRCs). It draws on postcolonial theory to investigate the (geo)political objectives behind the financial and economic means. Design/methodology/approach In line with the nature of postcolonial studies, the study applies a discourse analysis integrating it with empirical data on indebtedness and trade. Findings This study finds that FDI and the BRI, as a development project, need to be considered a double-edged sword for the receiving countries. The authors provide evidence that China has instrumentalized financial and economic means to gain political influence and pursue geopolitical ambitions. Moreover, investments into sensitive sectors (e.g. energy, infrastructure), combined with the BRCs' inability to pay back loans, could eventually lead to China gaining control of these assets. Research limitations/implications The study investigates the financial and economic means that are instrumentalized to gain political influence while not considering flows of technology and know-how. It also limits itself to the study of FDI coming from one specific country, i.e. China. Therefore, no comparison and evaluation are made of FDI from other countries, such as the USA or European countries. Practical implications By revealing noncommercial objectives and geopolitical ambitions that China pursues through the BRI, the authors derive policy implications for the BRCs, third countries and China. Originality/value The study contributes to postcolonial theory and neocolonialism by investigating how China uses financial and economic means to achieve noncommercial objectives and pursue geopolitical ambitions. Additionally, the authors enhance the understanding of FDI by highlighting more subtle aspects of the complex and contextual nature of FDI as a social phenomenon, which have been overlooked thus far. The authors challenge the predominant positive framing of FDI and provide a counterpoint to the way FDI is often coined.

What is the Rationale Behind China's Infrastructure Investment under the Belt and Road Initiative

Environmental Governance of Transportation Infrastructure under Belt and Road Initiative: A Unified Framework

China’s Belt and Road Initiative: the Rationale and Likely Impacts of the New Structural Economics Perspective

Reflections on the Belt and Road Initiative

Implicit Government Guarantee and Corporate Investment: Evidence from China’s Belt and Road Initiative

From traditional infrastructure to new infrastructure: a new focus of China’s Belt and Road Initiative diplomacy?

The Belt and Road Initiative and Regional Infrastructure Finance and Construction

The Belt and Road Initiative: What is in it for China?

Does the Belt and Road Initiative upgrade the global value chain for BRI Countries:Revealing the substantial role of infrastructure

Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development

Assessment of the Effects of Infrastructure Investment under the Belt and Road Initiative

The political economy of China's Belt and Road Initiative

An Introduction to a Way of Increasing Chinese International Influence: The Implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

Looking at China’s Belt and Road Initiative from the Central Asian Perspective

Is China’s Belt and Road Initiative a Zero-Sum Game?

Understanding China's Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment

Frames and facilitators by China in promoting the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

The Chinese belt and road initiative: development project with strings attached?

Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

Why China? the Economic Logic Behind China's One-Belt-One-Road Initiative