A Direct Estimate of the Impact of PM2.5, NO2, and O3 Exposure on Life Expectancy Using Propensity Scores.

Joel D. Schwartz,Qian Di,Weeberb J. Requia,Francesca Dominici,Antonella Zanobetti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001354
2021-01-01
Epidemiology
Abstract:Background: Many studies have reported associations of air pollutants and death, but fewer examined multiple pollutants, or used causal methods. We present a method for directly estimating changes in the distribution of age at death using propensity scores. Methods: We included all participants in Medicare from 2000 to 2016 (637,207,589 person-years of follow-up). We fit separate logistic regressions modeling the probability of death at each year of age from 65 to 98 or older as a function of exposure to particulate matter less tha 2.5 mu M in diameter (PM2.5), NO2, and O-3, using separate propensity scores for each age. We estimated the propensity score using gradient boosting. We estimated the distribution of life expectancy at three counterfactual exposures for each pollutant. Results: The estimated increase in mean life expectancy had the population been exposed to 7 versus 12 mu g/m(3) PM2.5 was 0.29 years (95% CI = 0.28, 0.30). The change in life expectancy had the population been exposed to 10 versus 20 ppb of NO2 was -0.01 years (95% CI = -0.015, -0.006). The increase in mean life expectancy had the population been exposed to 35 versus 45 ppb of O-3 was 0.15 years (95% CI = 0.14, 0.16). Each of these effects was independent and additive. Conclusions: We estimated that reducing PM2.5 and O-3 concentrations to levels below current standards would increase life expectancy by substantial amounts compared with the recent increase of life expectancy at age 65 of 0.7 years in a decade. Our results are not consistent with the hypothesis that exposure to NO2 decreases life expectancy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?