Abstract:Importance: Epigenetic clocks represent molecular evidence of disease risk and aging processes and have been used to identify how social and lifestyle characteristics are associated with accelerated biological aging. However, most research is based on samples of older adults who already have measurable chronic disease. Objective: To investigate whether and how sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics are associated with biological aging in a younger adult sample across a wide array of epigenetic clock measures. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study was conducted using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a US representative cohort of adolescents in grades 7 to 12 in 1994 followed up for 25 years to 2018 over 5 interview waves. Participants who provided blood samples at wave V (2016-2018) were analyzed, with samples tested for DNA methylation (DNAm) in 2021 to 2024. Data were analyzed from February 2023 to May 2024. Exposure: Sociodemographic (sex, race and ethnicity, immigrant status, socioeconomic status, and geographic location) and lifestyle (obesity status by body mass index [BMI] in categories of reference range or underweight [<25], overweight [25 to <30], obesity [30 to <40], and severe obesity [≥40]; exercise level; tobacco use; and alcohol use) characteristics were assessed. Main outcome and measure: Biological aging assessed from banked blood DNAm using 16 epigenetic clocks. Results: Data were analyzed from 4237 participants (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [2.0] years; percentage [SE], 51.3% [0.01] female and 48.7% [0.01] male; percentage [SE], 2.7% [<0.01] Asian or Pacific Islander, 16.7% [0.02] Black, 8.7% [0.01] Hispanic, and 71.0% [0.03] White). Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were more often associated with biological aging in clocks trained to estimate morbidity and mortality (eg, PhenoAge, GrimAge, and DunedinPACE) than clocks trained to estimate chronological age (eg, Horvath). For example, the β for an annual income less than $25 000 vs $100 000 or more was 1.99 years (95% CI, 0.45 to 3.52 years) for PhenoAgeAA, 1.70 years (95% CI, 0.68 to 2.72 years) for GrimAgeAA, 0.33 SD (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48 SD) for DunedinPACE, and -0.17 years (95% CI, -1.08 to 0.74 years) for Horvath1AA. Lower education, lower income, higher obesity levels, no exercise, and tobacco use were associated with faster biological aging across several clocks; associations with GrimAge were particularly robust (no college vs college or higher: β = 2.63 years; 95% CI, 1.67-3.58 years; lower vs higher annual income: <$25 000 vs ≥$100 000: β = 1.70 years; 95% CI, 0.68-2.72 years; severe obesity vs no obesity: β = 1.57 years; 95% CI, 0.51-2.63 years; no weekly exercise vs ≥5 bouts/week: β = 1.33 years; 95% CI, 0.67-1.99 years; current vs no smoking: β = 7.16 years; 95% CI, 6.25-8.07 years). Conclusions and relevance: This study found that important social and lifestyle factors were associated with biological aging in a nationally representative cohort of younger adults. These findings suggest that molecular processes underlying disease risk may be identified in adults entering midlife before disease is manifest and inform interventions aimed at reducing social inequalities in heathy aging and longevity.

Combined Healthy Lifestyle Score and Risk of Epigenetic Aging: a Discordant Monozygotic Twin Study.

[Association of Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors with Epigenetic Age Acceleration in Adults in China].

Accelerated Aging Mediates the Associations of Unhealthy Lifestyles with Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Mortality.

Comparative analysis of epigenetic aging clocks from CpG characteristics to functional associations

Trends of genetic contributions on epigenetic clocks and related methylation sites with aging: A population‐based adult twin study

Association of lifestyle with mortality and the mediating role of aging among older adults in China

Association between epigenetic age and type 2 diabetes mellitus or glycemic traits: A longitudinal twin study

Cardiovascular health and four epigenetic clocks

Exploring the Relationships between Lifestyle Patterns and Epigenetic Biological Age Measures in Men

Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors

The role of adolescent lifestyle habits in biological aging: A prospective twin study

Abstract P180: Relative Contributions Of Six Lifestyle Components To Epigenetic Aging In The Coronary Artery Risk Development In Young Adults (CARDIA) Study

Associations of Genetics, Behaviors, and Life Course Circumstances with a Novel Aging and Healthspan Measure: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.

Five Years of Change in Adult Twins: Longitudinal Changes of Genetic and Environmental Influence on Epigenetic Clocks

The Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Correlates of Epigenetic Aging in a Nationally Representative U.S. Study of Younger Adults

Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Factors and Epigenetic Aging in US Young Adults: NIMHD Social Epigenomics Program

EPIGENETIC PREDICTORS OF LIFESPAN AND HEALTHSPAN

An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan

Longitudinal Association of DNA Methylation with Type 2 Diabetes and Glycemic Traits: A 5-Year Cross-Lagged Twin Study

Multi-omic associations of epigenetic age acceleration are heterogeneously shaped by genetic and environmental influences

Genome-wide association studies identify 137 genetic loci for DNA methylation biomarkers of aging