Metabolomics in Epidemiology: Sources of Variability in Metabolite Measurements and Implications
Joshua N. Sampson,Simina M. Boca,Xiao Ou Shu,Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon,Charles E. Matthews,Ann W. Hsing,Yu Ting Tan,Bu-Tian Ji,Wong-Ho Chow,Qiuyin Cai,Da Ke Liu,Gong Yang,Yong Bing Xiang,Wei Zheng,Rashmi Sinha,Amanda J. Cross,Steven C. Moore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1109
2013-01-01
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Abstract:Abstract Background: Metabolite levels within an individual vary over time. This within-individual variability, coupled with technical variability, reduces the power for epidemiologic studies to detect associations with disease. Here, the authors assess the variability of a large subset of metabolites and evaluate the implications for epidemiologic studies. Methods: Using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) platforms, 385 metabolites were measured in 60 women at baseline and year-one of the Shanghai Physical Activity Study, and observed patterns were confirmed in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening study. Results: Although the authors found high technical reliability (median intraclass correlation = 0.8), reliability over time within an individual was low. Taken together, variability in the assay and variability within the individual accounted for the majority of variability for 64% of metabolites. Given this, a metabolite would need, on average, a relative risk of 3 (comparing upper and lower quartiles of “usual” levels) or 2 (comparing quartiles of observed levels) to be detected in 38%, 74%, and 97% of studies including 500, 1,000, and 5,000 individuals. Age, gender, and fasting status factors, which are often of less interest in epidemiologic studies, were associated with 30%, 67%, and 34% of metabolites, respectively, but the associations were weak and explained only a small proportion of the total metabolite variability. Conclusion: Metabolomics will require large, but feasible, sample sizes to detect the moderate effect sizes typical for epidemiologic studies. Impact: We offer guidelines for determining the sample sizes needed to conduct metabolomic studies in epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(4); 631–40. ©2013 AACR.