Abstract:The superposition principle of quantum mechanics states that any linear combination of two state vectors |0〉 and |1〉 represents an equally valid physical state of the quantum system: |ψ〉 = a|0〉+ b|1〉. For nonzero coefficients a and b, the state |ψ〉 will not be orthogonal to either |0〉 or |1〉, and |ψ〉 is traditionally said to be a coherent superposition of |0〉 and |1〉. Identifying coherence in this sense involves first stipulating a distinguished basis, {|0〉, |1〉, |2〉, · · · }, which is singled out by the unavoidable interaction with the environment, also known as decoherence [1]. An application of the superposition principle to many-body systems leads to quantum entanglement [2], a nonclassical type of correlation and an important resource for quantum technology. Recent results show that not all quantum technological tasks require the presence of entanglement, but can make use of other nonclassical features such as quantum discord [3] and even quantum coherence [4]. Motivated by this latter discovery, researchers have recently begun developing a resource theory of quantum coherence (see [4] for a review). This resource theory aims to rigorously quantify the amount of coherence in different quantum states and quantum processes, while further studying the use of coherence in quantum technologies, including quantum metrology, quantum computation, quantum random number generation, and quantum communication. From this resource-theoretic perspective, quantum coherence is characterized as some fungible property of quantum states that can be manipulated and exchanged from one system to the next. This issue contributes to various aspects of the resource theory of coherence. Fundamental properties of coherence quantifiers are studied for single particles (Rastegin 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414011, Liu et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414012, Rana and Lewenstein 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414002, Liu et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414018 and Johnston et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414010) and multipartite settings (Kraft and Piani 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414013, Xi 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414016, Takahashi and Chitambar 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414003 and Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Experimental Progress on Quantum Coherence: Detection, Quantification, and Manipulation

Quantum-Vacuum Effects And Quantum Coherence In Artificial Electromagnetic Materials

Quantum Coherence and State Conversion: Theory and Experiment

Quantifying Dynamical Coherence with Coherence Measures

Detecting non-Markovianity via quantified coherence: theory and experiments

Preface: Quantum Coherence

Certification and Quantification of Multilevel Quantum Coherence

Experimental verification of a coherence factorization law for quantum states

Experimental Test of the Relation Between Coherence and Path Information

Experimental Investigation Of The Nonlocal Advantage Of Quantum Coherence

Experimental Quantification of Dynamical Coherence Via Entangling Two Qubits

Experimental Study of Quantum Coherence Decomposition and Trade-off Relations in a Tripartite System

Directly Measuring the Degree of Quantum Coherence Using Interference Fringes.

Experimental Cyclic Interconversion between Coherence and Quantum Correlations.

Witnessing quantum coherence with prior knowledge of observables

Quantum Processes Which Do Not Use Coherence

Experimental Direct Measurement of the Relative Entropy of Coherence

Device-independent Verification of Quantum Coherence without Quantum Control

Experimental quantum phase discrimination enhanced by controllable indistinguishability-based coherence

Manipulating the Spatial Structure of Second-Order Quantum Coherence Using Entangled Photons

Direct Estimation of Quantum Coherence by Collective Measurements