Elevated expression of HMGB1 is prognostic of poor survival in patients with relapsed/refractory T/NK-CL

Caiqin Wang,Yu Wang,Jianghua Cao,Xiaoqing Sun,Xiaohua He,Peng Sun,Tianxiao Gao,Jiajia Huang,Zhiming Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-021-04473-4
2021-01-01
Annals of Hematology
Abstract:Despite the clinical value of HMGB1 in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), the impact of HMGB1 protein expression on survival of patients with mature T-cell and NK-cell lymphoma (T/NK-CL) is unknown. Here, we evaluated correlations of HMGB1 expression in tumor tissues with pathophysiological characteristics of disease and determined the prognostic value of HMGB1 expression in relapsed/refractory T/NK-CL. HMGB1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 66 cases of relapsed/refractory T/NK-CL, and specimens were classified as high or low HMGB1 expression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). High HMGB1 expression was significantly correlated with increased Ki67 levels and progressive lymphoma subtypes. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that high HMGB1 expression was associated with unfavorable PFS ( P = 0.006) and poorer OS ( P < 0.001). Prognostic factors identified by univariate analysis were prognostic index for peripheral T-cell lymphoma non-specified (PIT) score ≥ 2, bone marrow involvement, Ki67 ≥ 70%, and high HMGB1 expression. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that high HMGB1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poorer PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.593; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.171–11.027; P = 0.025] and OS [HR 7.663; 95% CI 2.367–24.803; P = 0.001]. A proposal prognostic model combining HMGB1 and Ki67 expression showed improved prognostic capacity and may help guide treatment planning. High HMGB1 expression may be a promising prognostic predictor and a potential therapeutic target for relapsed/refractory T/NK-CL. Furthermore, to apply HMGB1 as one of the best bio-maker, an external independent control cohort is needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?