Handover Strategies for Emerging LEO, MEO, and HEO Satellite Networks
Andra M. Voicu,Abhipshito Bhattacharya,Marina Petrova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3368503
IF: 3.9
2024-03-06
IEEE Access
Abstract:Satellite networks are expected to support global connectivity via future 3GPP non-terrestrial networks (NTNs), as well as private non-geostationary satellite orbit (NGSO) constellations, e.g. OneWeb, SpaceX, and Amazon's Kuiper. In both 3GPP and private NGSO networks, handling mobility is critical, due to the intrinsic continuous movement of the satellites. In this paper we select three representative inter-satellite handover (HO) strategies and we study their impact on the achievable space-to-ground link performance in emerging NGSO constellations. With 1) Closest Satellite HO a ground station always connects to the closest satellite, with 2) Max Visibility HO a ground station connects and remains connected to the satellite with the maximum visibility time, until this satellite stops being visible, while with 3) CINR-based HO a ground station is handed over to the closest satellite if the carrier-to-interference-and-noise ratio (CINR) decreases by 3 dB below a maximum reference level. The first two HO strategies achieve the upper and lower bounds of the satellite-to-ground link performance based on the constellation geometry, while the third one is representative of HO mechanisms triggered by signal strength measurements. We consider five private constellations with different characteristics, some of which have already been launched. The goal is to determine the most suitable HO strategy for each constellation and our results show that this depends on the constellation type, i.e. low earth orbit (LEO), medium earth orbit (MEO) and highly elliptical orbit (HEO), and design. For large LEO constellations with thousands of satellites like SpaceX and Kuiper, CINR-based HO is recommended, since it achieves a good tradeoff among the spectral efficiency, propagation delay and handover rate, while the Doppler shift is in any case high. For smaller LEO constellations with hundreds of satellites like OneWeb, Closest Satellite HO is preferred due to the highest spectral efficiency and lowest propagation delay, while the handover overhead is similar for all strategies. For MEO and HEO constellations with tens to a few hundreds of satellites like Mangata and Pleiades, Closest Satellite HO is best. This achieves the highest spectral efficiency, lowest delay and sometimes a low Doppler shift, while the handover rate is in any case low. Finally, CINR-based HO is recommended in seldom cases of strong inter-constellation interference. Overall, the results suggest that the inter-satellite HO strategy should be adjusted to the constellation specifics, where e.g. adaptive handover selection algorithms could be employed for constellations that are enhanced in time by adding new satellites and orbit types.
computer science, information systems,telecommunications,engineering, electrical & electronic