A Living, Interactive Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of First-line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Irbaz Bin Riaz,Huan He,Alexander J. Ryu,Rabbia Siddiqi,Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi,Yuan Yao,Muhammad Husnain,Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu,Jessey Mathew,Qurat Ul Ain Riaz Sipra,Per Olav Vandvik,Richard W. Joseph,Hongfang Liu,Zhen Wang,Vitaly Herasevich,Parminder Singh,Syed A. Hussain,Thai H. Ho,Alan H. Bryce,Lance C. Pagliaro,Mohammad H. Murad,Brian A. Costello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.016
IF: 24.267
2021-01-01
European Urology
Abstract:This innovative living and interactive systematic review provides the best current evidence on the comparative effectiveness of multiple treatment options for patients with untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The cabozantinib + nivolumab combination is likely to cause more adverse events but is ranked best for all efficacy outcomes, except for ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab (NivoIpi), which offers the best chance of a complete response. Pembrolizumab-axitinib and NivoIpi are acceptable alternatives, except NivoIpi may not be preferred for patients with favorable risk.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?