Imaging Evaluation of the Tumor Progression in 24 Cases with Peri-hilar Cholangiocarcinoma after Preoperative Biliary Drainage

G.-Z. Shi,X.-D. Shi,Q.-B. Tang,H.-M. Lin,J. Sun,C. Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.11.868
IF: 3.842
2021-01-01
HPB
Abstract:Introduction: Preoperative biliary drainage is essential for the radical treatment of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, the drainage process may take more than one month. The aim of this study was to justify the benefit of improving liver function over tumor progression by biliary drainage. Method: From December 1st, 2018 to November 30th, 2019, 24 jaundiced patients with peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma were treated at the department of biliary pancreatic surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Preoperative biliary drainage was performed for each case, and each had contrast-enhanced CT before the biliary drainage and the laparotomy, respectively. The tumor progression on imaging was evaluated and marked according to the new staging system from the International Cholangiocarcinoma Group. Results: All 24 patients (11 females and 13 males) underwent biliary drainage, including 12 with ENBD, 7 with PTCD, 5 with ENBD and PTCD. Average serum bilirubin level before and after drainage was 249.0 ±122.2μmol/L and 49.4 ±19.2μmol/L, respectively. The drainage time was 38.7±21.1 days(4 patients over 60 days). Tumor progression occurred at 4 of 24 patients, 2 of whom diagnosed as ICC with hilar involvement. Eight patients had unresectable mass, and 16 patients received large range hepatectomy with 0% mortality. The R0 resection rate was 62.5%(10/16). PV and HA reconstruction rate was 62.5%(10/16) and 25.0%(4/16), respectively. The hypohepatia and abdominal infection was 18.8% and 18.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Most patients with peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma had no tumor progression during biliary drainage, and this process could result in the increasing radical resection rate and decreasing mortality and morbility.Tabled 1Biliary drainage, surgical resection, and tumor progression on imaging of 24 patients
What problem does this paper attempt to address?