Does Dynamic Downscaling Modify the Proiected Impacts of Stabilized 1.5C and 2C warming on Hot Extremes Over China?

Jun Ge,Bo Qiu,Runqi Wu,Yipeng Cao,Weidan Zhou,Weidong Guo,Jianping Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092792
IF: 5.2
2021-01-01
Geophysical Research Letters
Abstract:Using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, we perform the first dynamic downscaling of Community Earth System Model (CESM) Low-Warming simulations to examine hot extreme changes over China in response to stabilized 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C global warming. WRF projects more intense and frequent hot extremes due to global warming, which are qualitatively consistent with CESM. However, WRF and CESM significantly differ in magnitudes of hot extreme changes. Compared to CESM, WRF indicates larger increases in hot extremes over Tibetan Plateau but smaller increases over other regions. Such differences between WRF and CESM are mainly caused by divergent projections of shortwave radiation changes. WRF also suggests fewer benefits achieved from the additional 0.5 degrees C warming constraint than CESM. This study demonstrates the climate risks might be inadequately informed by global climate models and it is necessary to reevaluate impacts of 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C global warming on regional climate based on regional climate models. Plain Language Summary Regional climate models (RCMs) are generally more superior than global climate models (GCMs) in climate modeling and projection at regional scales. Using a RCM, we examine the future hot extreme changes over China in response to the global warming being stabilized at 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C level by the end of the 21st century. We also compare the result from the RCM with that from a GCM. The RCM and GCM both indicate China will suffer from more intense and frequent hot extreme events due to the 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C warming. However, the magnitudes of hot extreme changes are significantly different between the two models. Specifically, the RCM indicates higher risks of hot extremes over Tibetan Plateau and lower risks over other regions than the GCM. Compared to the GCM, the RCM also indicates that fewer benefits can be achieved from the additional 0.5 degrees C warming.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?