Comparation of Oxylipin Profiles As Well As Their Substrates and Synthetic Enzymes Transcriptional Expression Between Marine Fish Larimichthys Crocea and Freshwater Fish Oncorhynchus Mykiss

Shengnan Gao,Kun Cui,Yongnan Li,Yuning Pang,Wei Fang,Kangsen Mai,Qinghui Ai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736641
IF: 5.135
2021-01-01
Aquaculture
Abstract:Oxylipins formed from polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) play an important role in normal physiology and function. Therefore, oxylipin profiles have been revealed in many species such as human, rats and even nonmammals. However, it is rarely studied in fish, a species known to be an excellent source of LC-PUFAs in human diets. In the present study, Larimichthys crocea and Oncorhynchus mykiss were selected as the marine and the freshwater fish model, respectively, used to quantify the oxylipin profiles by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and further synthesis related enzymes expression of the oxylipins were determined by RNAseq. A total of 57 oxylipins were quantified and arachidonic acid oxylipins dominated which occupied 42.1%, and oxylipins derived from DHA and EPA ranked the second (17.6%) and third (15.8%). Thirty differential oxylipins were screened and analyzed to compare the differences between L. crocea and O. mykiss. It could be concluded that L. crocea may be better at utilizing substrate fatty acids to synthesize oxylipins than O. mykiss, and the different expression of the synthetic related enzymes probably accounted for the differences. 12-HETE in O. mykiss and PGJ2 in L. crocea were the most representative oxylipins to distinguish the two fishes. In conclusion, our study was the first study comparing the oxylipin profiles between marine fish and freshwater fish, and the representative differential oxylipins may serve as markers, providing a new insight of identifying and distinguishing marine and freshwater fish species.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?