Identification of Rickettsia-Like Organism ( RLO ) in the Oyster Crassostrea rivularis
Yang Zhang,Jing Fang,Jingfeng Sun,Xinzhong Wu
2017-01-01
Abstract:The oyster Crassostrea rivularis Gould (also known as Crassostrea ariakensisis) an important bivalve species cultured in southeastern China. Since 1992, these oysters have suffered high mortality during winter and spring. An intracellular rickettsia-like organism (RLOs) was proposed as the causative agent. In this study, RLOs were purified from the gill and digestive gland of dying oyster (C. rivularis Gould), and their 16S rDNA was amplified from the purified products. To eliminate non-specific bacterial 16S rDNA contamination, the cloned products of bacterial 16S rDNA from gill RLO were screened by the probes of bacterial 16S rDNA amplified from the digestive gland RLO. Finally, the five strongest hybridized dots were picked out and sequenced. The RLO’s 16S rDNA sequence was reconfirmed and the pathogen was found only in epithelia cells by in situ hybridization (ISH) using specific probes. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis indicated the RLO bacterium found in oyster C. rivularis Gould was most similar to Piscirickettsia salmonis, and might be classified into the family of gamma proteobacteria. ABBREVIATIONS RLP: Rickettsia-Like Prokaryote; RLOs: Rickettsia-Like Organisms; ISH: in situ Hybridization; PBS: Phosphate-Buffered Saline; min: minutes; h: hours; TEM: Transmission Electron Microscopy; s: seconds; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction; SSPE: Saline Sodium Phosphate Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid; AP: Alkaline Phosphatase; DIG: Digoxin INTRODUCTION The oyster, Crassostrea rivularis Gould, also known as Crassostrea ariakensis, is one of the most economically important cultured species in southeastern China, especially in the Guangxi, Guangdong and Fujian provinces. With the large expansion of culturing, mass mortalities have occurred persistently and caused great economic loss since 1992 in the Guangdong province of China. Recent studies suggested oyster culture suffered from severe mortality caused by the pathogen Rickettsia-like organism (RLO) [1,2]. Rickettsias are Gram-negative bacteria, generally described as obligate intracellular pathogens, that have been reported in various fishes, crustaceans [3-15], and mollusks [1,16-20]. Since the first report by Harshbarger et al. in Mercenaria mercenaria, 1977 [21], many mollusk species have been reported to be infected with RLO, causing mortality and dramatic economic losses, such as the scallop, Pecten maximus [22]; the oyster Crassostrea virginia and the hard clam M. mercenaria [23]; the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata and Pinctada maximum [18,24]; the oyster C. rivularis [1]; the abalone Haliotis rufescens [25]; and the scallop Chlamys farreri (unpublished results). Although RLOs have been recognized as an important pathogen to aquatic organisms, studies have been carried out mostly on a morphological and pathological level, while few studies have identified them on the molecular level. In this paper, the RLO was purified from the infected oyster C. ariakensis, this bacterium might be classified as a member of gamma-proteobacteria by using 16S rDNA analysis and it is distantly related to Piscirickettsia salmonis by phylogenetic analysis. In situ-hybridization suggested that the pathogen is localized in oyster epithelia cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sample and processing The oyster, C. rivularis Gould, 2-3 years old, were collected from Hailing Bay in Yang Xi county, GuangDong province, China, in October 2004 when oyster deaths occurred in the field. The dying oysters were picked out, the bodies cross-sectioned Central Bringing Excellence in Open Access Wu et al. (2017) Email: Ann Clin Cytol Pathol 3(2): 1056 (2017) 2/8 into 5mm thick piece just above the ventricle, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for pathogenic observation. The residual body was stored at -80 until used for RLO purification. RLO purification Infected gills and digestive glands were used for RLO purification using renografin density gradient centrifugation [26,27] as described previously with some modifications. Briefly, infected tissues were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH7.4: Na2HPO4, 53.9mM; KH2PO4, 12.8mM; NaCl, 72.6mM) and centrifuged at 11000×g for 40 minutes (min) at 4 to remove the fat, then, the pellets were re-suspended in PBS, centrifuged at 700×g for 20 min at 4 and 1100×g for 10 min to remove cell debris. Subsequently, supernatant fluids were collected and recentrifuged at 11000×g for 40 min. The pellets were then used for density gradient centrifugation after being re-homogenized. About 300mg of the re-homogenized pellets were laid on the top layer of discontinuous renografin gradients (15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35% v/v from top to bottom in turn, each layer with about 5.5ml volume and 1.5 cm in depth) and centrifuged at 90,000×g for 2 hours (h) at 4 (Sorvall S80). The particles concentrated at the density interfaces of 20%-25% and 25%-30% were collected, diluted with 5 volumes of PBS, and re-centrifuged at 15000×g for 40 min. Finally, the pellets were diluted to a suitable suspension and stained with Uranyl Acetate and observed using JEOL transmission electron microscopes (TEM). RLO DNA extraction and 16S rDNA PCR amplification About 80mg granules purified from gills were used in DNA extraction, as well as granules purified from digestive glands. DNA was extracted according to the methods of Kellner-Cousin [28]. Briefly, purified RLOs were resuspended in TE buffer (TrisHCl 10 mM, EDTA 1mM, pH 8.0) and incubated for 20 min at 37 with lysozyme (1mg/ml). Then, sodium dodecyl sulfate and proteinase K were added to a final concentration of 0.5% and 100μg/ml respectively and the suspension was incubated at 55 for 3 h. Samples were extracted with phenol-chloroform (twice) and chloroform (once). Nucleic acids were precipitated with 100% ethanol, washed with 70% ethanol (twice), air-dried and dissolved in sterile distilled water. The universal bacterial PCR primers were derived from the highly conserved bacterial 16S region. The forward primer sequence is 5’-gcttaacacatgcaagtcg-3’ (Escherichia coli 16S rDNA positions 39-57), the reverse primer sequence is 5’actaccgattccgacttca-3’ (E. coli 16S rDNA positions 1322-1344). PCR was performed with 25μl reaction mixtures containing 1μl template DNA, 2.5μl 10×PCR buffer within Mg2+ (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 1μl of 10mM each dNTPs, 0.8U Taq polymerase (TaKaRa), and 0.5μl each of 25mM universal bacterial 16S rDNA primers. The mixture was denatured at 94 for 2 min before amplification. The amplification profile consisted of 30 seconds (s) at 94, 30 s at 56 and 90 s at 72 cycled 30 times, with an additional 5 min at 72 following the final cycle using Thermal PX2 PCR amplifier (Thermal Ltd.). The PCR products were determined using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. Expected PCR products (size ~1300bp) were collected from the agarose gel and cloned into a PMD-18T vector (Takara Inc.). Eliminating unwanted bacterial contamination To eliminate unwanted bacterial 16S contamination, the 16S fragment amplified from the oyster gill was screened using the probes from the fragments of digestive glands. Sixty-six of 16S fragments from the gill RLO were screened by probes from the digestive glands. The probes were labeled with biotin according to the instructions provided in DIG HIGH prime DNA labeling and Detection starter kit (Roche). The result was recorded by X-ray film (Koda). Molecular phylogenetic analysis The nucleotide sequences of the RLO 16S rDNA DQ123914.1 and DQ118733.1 have been blasted within the RDP_ SeqDescByOTU_tax_outline.txt. A total of 287 sequences from separate infected oysters with identity >=90% were selected. Then those sequences were further selected by OTU number, only those with OTU number >= 3 and with the best score were selected. The phylogenetic tree was made by MEGA 3.1 [29], with the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) Method. In situ hybridization Infected tissues were dissected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4), dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100% v/v) for two times, followed by three washes in xylene, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5μm, mounted on APES-coated slides, and baked at 55 for 4 h. Then the section was deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a reverse ethanol series. The rehydrated slides used for in situ hybridization were digested in 30 μg ml-1 Proteinase K solution (pH 8.0) under 37 for about 20 min before hybridization. Slides were then neutralized in 2× saline sodium phosphate ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (2×SSPE, pH 7.4) buffer for 10 min, and treated with prehybridization solution (0.5mg ml-1 salmon sperm DNA, 5×Denhardt’s reagent, and 2×SSPE) in a moist chamber at 42 for 30 min. After the prehybridization, 100ng of the positive probes and the negative control (NC) probes were separately added onto two different slides and hybridized at 42 for about 16 h in the moist chamber. After hybridization, unbound probes were washed off with 2×SSPE, 1×SSPE, and 0.5×SSPE at 42. Finally, the slides were added into AP-conjugated (Alkaline phosphatase) anti-digoxin (DIG) antibody and detected by NBT/BCIP indication reagent. The specificity of assumed probe sequences chosen from highly variable regions of the RLO 16S rDNA sequence (GenBank accession number DQ123914) were confirmed by retrieving the sequence within the databases DDBJ-EMBL-GenBank using the BLASTn service. The probe was monolabeled with DIG and the sequence is DIG-5’-aggtagtctgtgaataatgggctactg-3’ at the position from 402-427 in DQ123914. A NC probe was also implemented to monitor the experimental conditions. The NC probe sequence was DIG-5’-gggatgtaggttaataccttgcatctt-3’ with a 12 nucleotides mismatch to the RLO sequence, but less than 12 nucleotides mismatch to other bacterial 16S rDNA sequences by NCBI BLAST database. Theory/calculation In this study, it is reported that the RLO bacterium found Central Bringing Excellence in Open Access Wu et al. (