Abstract:Background: In recent years, despite several surgical techniques having been applied, the early incontinence rate after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains high. In this study, we reconstructed an internal urethral sphincter (IUS) with anterior bladder neck tube (ABNT) to improve early return of continence and find a more effective technique for early urinary incontinence after RP. Methods: In this study, 96 previous patients who did not receive an ABNT between October 2018 and May 2020 were compared as historical controls (the control group). A total of 210 consecutive patients underwent robotic or laparoscopic RP with ABNT between May 2020 and February 2023 (the ABNT group). The inclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-1 and localized prostate cancer (clinical stages cT1-3, cN0, cM0). The exclusion criteria included patients with diabetes, neurologic diseases, previous pelvic operations, symptoms of urinary incontinence, prior radiation, focal therapy, or androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. ABNT was reconducted with a U-shaped flap from the anterior wall of the bladder neck, and was then anastomosed with the urethra. In the control group, the bladder outlet was directly anastomosed with the urethra. Continence, as defined if 0 pads were used per day and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score ≤6, was assessed at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after catheter removal. At 2 weeks after catheter removal, urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) and upright urethrography were performed to evaluate the function of ABNT in the ABNT group. Results: More patients in the ABNT group were continent than those in the control group at 1 week (85.2% vs. 22.9%, P<0.001), 4 weeks (91.4% vs. 27.1%, P<0.001), 8 weeks (95.2% vs. 40.6%, P<0.001), 12 weeks (100% vs. 71.9%, P<0.001), and at 24 weeks (100% vs. 87.5%, P<0.001) after catheter removal. Stricture was presented in 5.2% and 2.1% (P=0.34) in the ABNT group and control group, respectively. UPP showed that a functional IUS was reconstructed with ABNT. Upright urethrography showed that the ABNT was filled with contrast medium in the urination period and with no contrast medium during the storage period and interruption of urination. Conclusions: The ABNT technique significantly improved early return of continence in comparison with the no ABNT technique, especially the immediate continence. The ABNT technique reconstructed the functional IUS with acceptable urethral stricture. The limitations of the present study include that the comparison was conducted retrospectively with a historical cohort and lack of randomization, and the single center setting. A prospective, randomized, and multicenter evaluation is expected.

"Sandwich" Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study.

["Sandwich" Urethra Reconstruction Improves the Early Continence Following Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy].

“Total Reconstruction” of the Urethrovesical Anastomosis Contributes to Early Urinary Continence in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Urinary continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation]

Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results

Internal urethral sphincter reconstruction with anterior bladder neck tube for robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: improving early return of continence

Comparison in Efficacy of Periurethral Reconstruction Leading to Urinary Continence Improvement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

[Postoperative Urinary Continence and Learning Curve after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy].

Improved early continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the urethral hammock technique

Improvement of Continence by Laparoscopic Reconstructive Radical Prostatectomy

The Impact of Three Different Bladder Neck Reconstruction Techniques on Urinary Continence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Anterior Sphincter-sparing Suturing of the Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

A Modified Lateral Seminal Vesicle Approach Preserving the Bladder Neck in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Improves Urinary Continence Recovery

Continence-Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Modified three‐layer vesicourethral reconstruction in robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy can change cystography pattern and improve early recovery of continence

Effects of Maximal Urethral Length Preservation on Recovery of Urinary Continence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Experience of the Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy via Completely Posterior and Intrafascial Approach: A Report of 5 Cases

Clinical efficacy of a rehabilitation management protocol for urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

The Efficacy of Urinary Continence in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Bladder-Prostatic Muscle Reconstruction and Bladder Neck Eversion Anastomosis

Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Anatomic Features on Urinary Continence Recovery after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.