Abstract:While carbon pricing is widely seen as a crucial element of climate policy and has been implemented in many countries, it also has met with strong resistance. We provide a comprehensive overview of public perceptions of the fairness of carbon pricing and how these affect policy acceptability. To this end, we review evidence from empirical studies on how individuals judge personal, distributional and procedural aspects of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. In addition, we examine preferences for particular redistributive and other uses of revenues generated by carbon pricing and their role in instrument acceptability. Our results indicate a high concern over distributional effects, particularly in relation to policy impacts on poor people, in turn reducing policy acceptability. In addition, people show little trust in the capacities of governments to put the revenues of carbon pricing to good use. Somewhat surprisingly, most studies do not indicate clear public preferences for using revenues to ensure fairer policy outcomes, notably by reducing its regressive effects. Instead, many people prefer using revenues for 'environmental projects' of various kinds. We end by providing recommendations for improving public acceptability of carbon pricing. One suggestion to increase policy acceptability is combining the redistribution of revenue to vulnerable groups with the funding for environmental projects, such as on renewable energy.Key policy insights If people perceive carbon pricing instruments as fair, this increases policy acceptability and support.People's satisfaction with information provided by the government about the policy instrument increases acceptability.While people express high concern over uneven distribution of the policy burden, they often prefer using carbon pricing revenues for environmental projects instead of compensation for inequitable outcomes.Recent studies find that people's preferences shift to using revenues for making policy fairer if they better understand the functioning of carbon pricing, notably that relatively high prices of CO2-intensive goods and services reduce their consumption.Combining the redistribution of revenue to support both vulnerable groups and environmental projects, such as on renewable energy, seems to most increase policy acceptability.

Effects of perceived fairness on willingness to pay

Impacts Of Social Comparison And Fairness Facet Preference On Justice Judgments

Perception of Fairness of Commercial Housing Price Increase Caused by Inflation

Fairness views and cooperation under varying levels of economic inequality

The Effect of Task Difficulty and Self-Contribution on Fairness Consideration: An Event-Related Potential Study

Corporate social responsibility and perceived fairness of price increases

I Paid More Than You (before)?! the Effects of Self-Construal and Comparison Target on Price Unfairness Perceptions

The effect of experiences of fairness on honest behavior: a behavioral and neural study

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Neural Responses to Unfairness and Fairness Depend on Self-Contribution to the Income.

The Price of Fairness for Indivisible Goods

Fairness Beliefs Affect Perceived Economic Inequality

The Impact of Social Preferences and Information on the Willingness to Pay for Fairtrade Products

The moderating role of donation quantifiers on price fairness judgments

Behavior-Based Pricing: An Analysis of the Impact of Peer-Induced Fairness

Self-Perceptions of Fairness in Individual and Group Contexts

Warm Glow or Extra Charge? The Ambivalent Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Customers’ Perceived Price Fairness

Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature

Fairness’s effect on the pricing decisions in a supply chain

Limiting support for environmental policies: Unfairness is a more critical barrier than cost and ineffectiveness

The nature and consequences of price unfairness in services: a comparison to tangible goods