Abstract:Software developers commonly use third-party software libraries to reduce implementation efforts and mitigate errors in their source code while building high-quality and reliable software. To support software evolution, newer libraries are released periodically with added features, improvements in performance as well as critical updates such as bug fixes. Hence, older, existing (source) libraries need to be replaced with their newer, updated (target) counterparts, in a process known as library migration. Typically, library migration is a time-consuming, manual, and error-prone process that requires developers to analyze the source and target library code and its documentation. Specifically, developers examine Application Programming Interface (API) implementations and documentation to replace each source API with a target API without modifying the underlying software functionality. While recent works have used various techniques to recommend suitable target library replacements, these approaches do not generalize well, e.g., when a source library method needs to be replaced by one or more target library APIs or methods. To address this limitation, we propose the use of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to identify suitable method replacements during library migration. In particular, we formulate library migration at the method-level as a multi-objective combinatorial optimization problem and examine the performance of 7 multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: UNSGAIII, RNSGAII, AGEMOEA, SMSEMOA, NSGAII, IBEA and MOEAD. We use method signature and documentation similarity, and co-occurrence probability to accurately recommend one or more target library methods. We evaluate our approach by conducting an empirical study on 9 popular Java library migrations mined from 57,447 open-source projects on GitHub. Our results demonstrate that UNSGAIII, RNSGAII, AGEMOEA, SMSEMOA, NSGAII, IBEA and MOEAD achieve 90%, 89%, 94%, 90%, 91%, 94%, and 71% precision on average, and 83%, 23%, 58%, 63%, 58%, 60% and 17% average recall respectively. In the interest of reproducibility, we make all code and results publicly available at: http://bit.ly/MOO-api-migration.

MigrationAdvisor: Recommending Library Migrations from Large-Scale Open-Source Data

A Multi-Metric Ranking Approach for Library Migration Recommendations

Accurate Library Recommendation Using Combining Collaborative Filtering and Topic Model for Mobile Development.

A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Java Library Migrations: Prevalence, Trends, and Rationales

A Study of Library Migration in Java Software

MUT: Human-in-the-Loop Unit Test Migration

Self-Admitted Library Migrations in Java, JavaScript, and Python Packaging Ecosystems: A Comparative Study

Learning to Recommend Third-Party Library Migration Opportunities at the API Level

Migrating Client Code without Change Examples

Third-party software library migration at the method-level using multi-objective evolutionary search

A Multi-Metric Ranking with Label Correlations Approach for Library Migration Recommendations

Providing Upgrade Plans for Third-party Libraries: A Recommender System using Migration Graphs

On the Use of Information Retrieval to Automate the Detection of Third-Party Java Library Migration at the Method Level

A Scalable, Adaptive, Self-management and Fault-Tolerant Architecture for Digital Library

How Does API Migration Impact Software Quality and Comprehension? An Empirical Study

M3: Semantic API Migrations

Characterizing Python Library Migrations

Software Architectural Migration

Refactoring support for class library migration

A3: Assisting Android API Migrations Using Code Examples

Learning migration models for supporting incremental language migrations of software applications