Comparison of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL on glycemic control and hypoglycemic events in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A Patient-level meta-analysis of phase 3 studies

Linong Ji,Yan Bi,Shandong Ye,Yun Huang,Xia Zhang,Shuhua Shang,Nan Cui,Huiqiu Yin,Minlu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108848
IF: 8.18
2021-01-01
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Abstract:Aims: To evaluate efficacy and safety of Gla-300 with Gla-100 in a patient-level meta analysis among large East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: A patient level meta-analysis of three EDITION studies with similar design and endpoints were conducted over 6-months treatment period. The analysis included 547 patients treated with Gla-300 and 348 patients treated with Gla-100. Results: Over 6-month treatment period, mean change in HbA1c was similar for Gla-300 [Least square (LS) mean, (SE):-1.13 (0.05) % and Gla-100:-1.14 (0.05) %], showing non inferiority of Gla-300 to Gla-100 (LS mean difference: 0.02%, 95% CI:-0.08 to 0.11). Gla300 was associated with reduced risk of hypoglycemic event (confirmed < 3.9 mmol/L or severe) vs Gla-100 at any time of day or at night (00:00-05:59 h). The event rates of hypoglycemia were consistently lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100. Severe hypoglycemia was rare in both treatment groups. Weight gain was minimal in both treatment groups. Conclusion: Gla-300 provides comparable glycemic control to Gla-100 in East Asian patients with broad clinical spectrum of T2DM, with consistently less hypoglycemia at any time of the day and night. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?