Clinical Effect of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy Approach Aortic Valve Replacement
WU Baoxing,ZHANG Hongqiang,FENG Yujia,LAI Jinhua,XIA Limin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2022.35.015
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the feasibility,safety,and short-term effect of right anterior mini-thoracotomy approach aortic valve replacement（RAT-AVR）.Methods From August 2018 to July 2022,the clinical data of 30 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement in the Xiamen Branch,Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into the minimally invasive group（19 cases） and the conventional group（11cases） according to the surgical approach.The patients in the minimally invasive group underwent RAT-AVR,and the patients in the conventional group underwent aortic valve replacement through the conventional full sternotomy approach.The intraoperative conditions（cardiopulmonary bypass time,aortic cross-clamping time and parallel cycle time）,postoperative conditions（perioperative related indicators,the incidences of complications,etc.） and follow-up data of the two groups of patients were compared,the feasibility and safety of RAT-AVR were evaluated,according to observing the clinical data of the two groups of pati ents.Results All patients successfully completed the surgery,without a second turnaround,and patients in the minimally invasive group did not switch to conventional full sternotomy.The cardiopulmonary bypass time and the aortic cross-clarrping time in the minimally invasive group were longer than those in the conventional group,with statistically significant differences（P ＜0.05）.The drainage volume at 24 hours after operation in the minimally invasive group was less than that in the conventional group,and the hospitalization day in the minimally invasive group was shorter than that in the conventional group,with statistically significant differences（P＜0.05）.All patients had no permanent pacemaker implantation,no secondary thoracotomy for hemostasis,no deep incision infection,and no perivalvular leakage.There were no significant differences in the incidence of new atrial fibrillation and blood transfusion rate between the minimally invasive group and the conventional group（P＞ 0.05）.All patients were discharged uneventfully from hospital in the two groups,with a median follow-up time of 12months.All patients did not die.The outpatient evaluation of New York Heart Association（NY HA） were class Ⅰ and Ⅱ.Conclusion Although RAT-AVR increases the cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time compared with the aorti cvalve replacement through the conventional full stemotomy approach,it does not increase the risk of operation. It is a safe and effective operation with less trauma,rapid recovery.