Glioma grading, molecular feature classification, and microstructural characterization using MR diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE) imaging

Sirui Li,Yuan Zheng,Wenbo Sun,Samo Lasič,Filip Szczepankiewicz,Qing Wei,Shihong Han,Shuheng Zhang,Xiaoli Zhong,Liang Wang,Huan Li,Yuxiang Cai,Dan Xu,Zhiqiang Li,Qiang He,Danielle van Westen,Karin Bryskhe,Daniel Topgaard,Haibo Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07959-x
IF: 7.034
2021-01-01
European Radiology
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the potential of diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE) for grading, molecular feature classification, and microstructural characterization of gliomas. Materials and methods Participants with suspected gliomas underwent DIVIDE imaging, yielding parameter maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MK A ), isotropic mean kurtosis (MK I ), total mean kurtosis (MK T ), MK A /MK T , and microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA). Tumor type and grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 mutant status, and the Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI) were determined after surgery. Statistical analysis included 33 high-grade gliomas (HGG) and 17 low-grade gliomas (LGG). Tumor diffusion metrics were compared between HGG and LGG, among grades, and between wild and mutated IDH types using appropriate tests according to normality assessment results. Receiver operating characteristic and Spearman correlation analysis were also used for statistical evaluations. Results FA, MD, MK A , MK I , MK T , μFA, and MK A /MK T differed between HGG and LGG (FA: p = 0.047; MD: p = 0.037, others p < 0.001), and among glioma grade II, III, and IV (FA: p = 0.048; MD: p = 0.038, others p < 0.001). All diffusion metrics differed between wild-type and mutated IDH tumors (MK I : p = 0.003; others: p < 0.001). The metrics that best discriminated between HGG and LGGs and between wild-type and mutated IDH tumors were MK T and FA respectively (area under the curve 0.866 and 0.881). All diffusion metrics except FA showed significant correlation with Ki-67 LI, and MK I had the highest correlation coefficient ( r s = 0.618). Conclusion DIVIDE is a promising technique for glioma characterization and diagnosis. Key Points • DIVIDE metrics MK I is related to cell density heterogeneity while MK A and μFA are related to cell eccentricity. • DIVIDE metrics can effectively differentiate LGG from HGG and IDH mutation from wild-type tumor, and showed significant correlation with the Ki-67 labeling index. • MK I was larger than MK A which indicates predominant cell density heterogeneity in gliomas. • MK A and MK I increased with grade or degree of malignancy, however with a relatively larger increase in the cell eccentricity metric MK A in relation to the cell density heterogeneity metric MK I .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?