Abstract:With the development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, a new generation of editing methods that convert specific bases has enabled precise single-base mutations. To date, conversion of cytosine to thymidine and adenine to guanine has been achieved using the cytidine deaminase APOBEC1 and adenosine deaminase (TadA), respectively. However, the base editing efficiency can be unacceptably low in some cell types or at certain target loci. One reason might be the lack of a selective pressure against the survival of non-edited cells. Few studies on ABE in prokaryotes have been reported, probably due to the relatively low editing efficiency of TadA. Improving the editing efficiency is the key for establishing base editing techniques and especially the ABE technologies. In this work, a selective pressure against non-edited cells was implemented to increase the base editing efficiency. Firstly, we fused nCas9 or dCas9 with TadA to compare the editing efficiency of nCas9-TadA and dCas9-TadA fusion complexes in the model prokaryote Escherichia coli. While nCas9-TadA was able to achieve A to G base editing (ABE) with a moderate efficiency, dCas9-TadA had a very low efficiency. To enrich for edited cells and increase the base-editing efficiency, we utilized the induction of double-strand breaks by active Cas9, which leads to the death of prokaryotic cells. By introducing an inducible active Cas9 with the same editing gRNA as the nCas9-TadA in the base editing process, the cells with non-edited target bases remained vulnerable to Cas9 and were eliminated. Thus, a double-check base editing (DBE) method was established, which significantly improved the editing efficiency of ABE in E. coli, reaching 99.0% for some sites. By placing a selective pressure against non-edited cells, the DBE strategy might also be applied to various scenarios to increase the efficiency of many different base editing targets or even for epigenetic DNA modification techniques.

Improving The Precision Of Base Editing By Bubble Hairpin Single Guide Rna

Precise base editing with CC context-specificity using engineered human APOBEC3G-nCas9 fusions

Expanding the Genome-Targeting Scope and the Site Selectivity of High-Precision Base Editors

Imperfect guide-RNA (igRNA) enables CRISPR single-base editing with ABE and CBE

Rationally Designed APOBEC3B Cytosine Base Editors with Improved Specificity

Engineering a Precise Adenine Base Editor with Minimal Bystander Editing.

Engineering precise adenine base editor with infinitesimal rates of bystander mutations and off-target editing

Highly Efficient Base Editing in Rabbit by Using Near-Pamless Engineered CRISPR/Cas9 Variants

Programmable RNA base editing via targeted modifications

Increasing the Efficiency and Targeting Range of Cytidine Base Editors Through Fusion of a Single-Stranded DNA-binding Protein Domain

Increasing the Targeting Scope and Efficiency of Base Editing with Proxy‐BE Strategy

An APOBEC3A-Cas9 Base Editor with Minimized Bystander and Off-Target Activities

Development and application of base editors in bacterial genome editing

sgBE: a structure-guided design of sgRNA architecture specifies base editing window and enables simultaneous conversion of cytosine and adenosine

Design and application of the transformer base editor in mammalian cells and mice

Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors

Improving Editing Efficiency for the Sequences with NGH PAM Using Xcas9-Derived Base Editors.

Rational Design of Enhanced Nme2Cas9 and Nme2 Cas9 Nucleases and Base Editors

Efficient C-to-G Base Editing with Improved Target Compatibility Using Engineered Deaminase-nCas9 Fusions.

Double-Check Base Editing for Efficient A to G Conversions

nCas9 Engineering for Improved Target Interaction Presents an Effective Strategy to Enhance Base Editing