Abstract:<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Information disclosure is a top priority for official responses to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The information published by the authorities as a response to the crisis has been a cause of great concern to the public; however, there is limited evidence of any systematic analyses of the disclosed epidemic information. This in turn has important implications for risk communication. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to describe and compare the officially released content regarding the local epidemic situations and analyze the characteristics of information disclosure through local transmission for both the individual and total population levels in major cities of China. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The 31 capital cities in mainland China were enrolled in a city-level observational study. Data were retrieved from local municipalities and health commission websites as of March 18, 2020. A checklist was employed as a rapid qualitative assessment tool to analyze the information disclosure performance of each city. Descriptive analyses and data visualizations were produced to present and compare the comparative performances of the cities. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> In total, 29 cities (93.5%) established specific COVID-19 webpages to disclose information. Among them, 12 of the city webpages were added to their corresponding municipal websites. A majority of the cities (21 of 31, 67.7%) published their first cases of infection in a timely manner on the actual day of confirmation. Regarding the information disclosures highlighted on the websites, news updates from local media or press briefings were the most prevalent (28 of 29, 96.6%), followed by epidemic surveillance (25 of 29, 86.2%) and advice for the public (25 of 29, 86.2%). Clarifications of misinformation and frequently asked questions were largely overlooked as only 2 cities provided this valuable information. The median daily update frequency of epidemic surveillance summaries was 1.2 times per day (interquartile range 1.0 to 1.3 times), and the majority of these summaries (18 of 25, 72.0%) also provided detailed information of confirmed cases. The reporting of key indicators in the epidemic surveillance summaries, as well as critical facts included in the confirmed case reports, varied substantially between cities. In general, the best performance in terms of timely reporting and the transparency of information disclosures were observed in the municipalities directly administered by the central government compared to the other cities. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Timely and effective efforts to disclose information related to the COVID-19 epidemic have been made in major cities of China. Continued improvements to local authority reporting will contribute to more effective public communication and efficient public health research responses. The development of protocols and the standardization of epidemic message templates—as well as the use of uniform operating procedures to provide regular information updates—should be prioritized to ensure a coordinated national response. </sec>

Can Local Governments’ Disclosure of Pandemic Information Decrease Residents’ Panic when Facing COVID-19 in China?

Information disclosure during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: A city-level observational study (Preprint)

Information Disclosure During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: City-Level Observational Study.

Managing Urban Citizens' Panic Levels and Preventive Behaviours During COVID-19 with Pandemic Information Released by Social Media

Government Trust in a Time of Crisis: Survey Evidence at the Beginning of the Pandemic in China

Can Information Disclosure Buffer Psychological Anxiety Due to COVID-19? Evidence from China.

Official and Unofficial Media Information and the Public Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: an Empirical Analysis

Timeliness of information disclosure during the low transmission period of COVID-19: resident-level observational study in China

Perceived Beliefs, Uncertainty, and Behavioral Responses During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Findings from a Convenience Sample.

The Impact of Epidemic Information on the Public’s Worries and Attitude Toward Epidemic Prevention Measures During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Government Information Disclosure and Citizen Coproduction During COVID‐19 in China

Public Psychosocial and Behavioral Responses in the First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Large Survey in China

Citizen Assessments of Government Actions in the COVID-19 Outbreak in China

Effects of negative emotions and information perceived value on residents' risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical survey from China

Public Behavior Change, Perceptions, Depression, and Anxiety in Relation to the COVID-19 Outbreak

Psychological Responses, Behavioral Changes and Public Perceptions During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: a Population Based Cross-Sectional Survey

Revealing the spatiotemporal characteristics of the general public's panic levels during the pandemic crisis in China

Authorized, clear and timely communication of risk to guide public perception and action: lessons of COVID-19 from China

Impact of Risk Information Characteristics on Risk Perception of COVID-19 among the Chinese Public

Emergency Response and Risk Communication Effects of Local Media during COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Study Based on a Social Media Network

Using fear appeal theories to understand the effects of location information of patients on citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic