Abstract:In ages of rapid changes and growing competitiveness, innovation is considered as the primary driver for firms to keep sustainable competitiveness, achieve technological catch-up and continue growing beyond catching-up. From the standpoint of firms, organizational learning is a crucial path toward innovation. Organizational learning is required not only to take full advantage of the existing knowledge stock, but also to explore new knowledge and technological opportunities. The former is exploitative learning based on existing knowledge, and the latter is explorative learning oriented to new knowledge and techniques. However, exploitative learning and explorative learning tap into totally different organizational routines and management behavior. Due to the finite resources and capabilities, firms face the dilemma between exploitative and explorative learning. How to organize explorative and exploitative learning in a reasonable manner is the key solution for firms to build efficient and effective R&D systems. Compared with firms in developed country, Chinese firms face constraints, such as scarce resources, imperfect market infrastructure,poor innovation capability and insufficient advanced knowledge. Thus, the trade-off between explorative learning and exploitative learning becomes more challenging. Chinese firms need to learn how to rationally allocate limited resources in ambidextrous learning so as to maximize the innovation performance. Scholars hold different opinions on whether innovation performance could benefit from ambidextrous learning. In addition, internal contextual factor is the carrier of ambidextrous learning which deserves attention. The role of internal contextual factors in the ambidextrous learning and the innovation mechanism need further exploration and validation. Therefore, to investigate the mechanism of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance is important for both practices and theory building. In this research, we investigate some global semiconductor companies listed in America. The patent data of these firms between 1991 and 2000 are collected and analyzed with the help of multiple techniques. Based on a view of knowledge, this research discusses two mechanisms of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance, respectively combined ambidextrous learning and balanced ambidextrous learning. The empirical results show that combined ambidextrous learning positively improves firms' innovation performance,while balanced ambidextrous learning negatively reduces innovation performance. In addition,this research adopts a micro-level lens and claims that internal contextual factors are fundamental factors for the mechanism of ambidextrous learning and innovation performance. As a significant contextual factor,an intra-organizational R&D collaboration network is constructed by using patent citation. The empirical research shows that the density of intra-organizational R&D collaboration network significantly moderates the mechanism of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance. When intra-organizational collaboration network gets higher, the positive influence of combined ambidextrous learning would be weakens,and the negative influence of balanced ambidextrous learning s deteriorates. Based on the boundary of organizational cognition, this research seeks new methods to evaluate exploitative or explorative learning, which to some extent helps explain the inconsistency in existing literature. The empirical result implicates that the pursuit of the balance between exploitative learning and explorative learning is not the best solution. An adjustment on each proportion according to different strategic orientations is necessary. Furthermore, this research focuses on the importance of internal contextual factors. By calculating the density of intra-organizational network, this research provides a theoretical foundation and practical guide for the construction of R&D collaboration networks.

How and when Are Learning‐adaptable Newcomers Innovative? Examining Mechanisms and Constraints

Are Adaptive Newcomers Innovative? The Role of Positive Framing & Supervisor Uncertainty Avoidance

Career Adaptability and Turnover Intention: A Dual‐Mediation Model

Ambidextrous Leaders Helping Newcomers Get on Board: Achieving Adjustment and Proaction Through Distinct Pathways

Use of Proactive Socialization Tactics and Socialization Outcomes: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach to Understanding Newcomer Socialization Process

Empathetic leadership and employees' innovative behavior: examining the roles of career adaptability and uncertainty avoidance

Newcomer Proactive Personality and Creative Behavior

The Mechanism of Authentic Leadership and Newcomers' feedback-seeking Behavior——Base on Theory of Supervisor Identity

Will newcomer job crafting bring positive outcomes? The role of leader-member exchange and traditionality

Getting What's New from Newcomers: Empowering Leadership, Creativity, and Adjustment in the Socialization Context

The Mechanism and Boundary of the Impact of Family Adaptability on Employees' Innovative Behavior

Navigating the innovation maze: the role of supervisor developmental feedback in fostering ambidextrous learning and ambidextrous innovation

The Mechanism of Ambidextrous Learning in Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Intra-organizational Collaboration Network

Newcomers' Future Work Selves, Perceived Supervisor Support, and Proactive Socialization in Chinese Organizations

Facilitating Change: The Role of Adaptability and LMX for Change Support

The Influence of Supervisor Developmental Feedback on Employee Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model

Exploitative Leadership and Employee Innovative Behaviour in China: a Moderated Mediation Framework

Wear Glasses for Supervisors to Discover the Beauty of Subordinates: Supervisor Developmental Feedback and Organizational Ambidexterity

Linking Ambidextrous Organizational Culture to Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Empowerment and Transformational Leadership

Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation.

Role of adaptive leadership in learning organizations to boost organizational innovations with change self-efficacy